Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Speculation, discoveries, complaints, accusations, praise, and all other Erfworld discussion.

Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby mortissimus » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:21 pm

I have been thinking about this sending gems thing. In the lastest comic Slately received a gem from Charlie that payed for promoting Trem (and possibly more). Earlier he tried to get a gem from Don King but Transylvito's moneymancer refused, a probably vital plot point in the development of Transylvito.

On the other hand we know that contracts can have punishment clauses that forces Schmuckers to be moved automagicly from one side to the other. So there is a mechanism for direct fund transfer, then why use gems? For example Don King could have made a contract with Slately stating that Don would not whistle by punishment of 50k Schmuckers. A quick tune later, the funds are transfered.

I see two possibilities here:

1) there is a potential exploit, which is not used because Erfworlders follow the rules. Parson might use it sometime down the line.

2) I have misunderstood the rules.

Thoughts?
mortissimus
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:04 am

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby drachefly » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:25 pm

2a) the mechanism is not instant payment, but a restriction of the side's abilities until payment is made.
User avatar
drachefly
Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 1647
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:36 pm

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby 0beron » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:29 pm

It's likely one of those things that doesn't make sense in our terms but is perfectly clear in Erfworld logic. You can make treaties about non-aggression and alliance and the like, but you can't just draw up a silly agreement with the intent to freely transfer funds.
Alternatively, the penalties for breaking a contract may not actually go to the opposing party, they may literally be a penalty that just vanishes from your treasury into nothingness.

Now, if the first point I raise is true, then it is likely Parson's lateral thinking will lead him to realize he can make a legitimate treaty and then somehow force it to be broken, triggering the transfer. If so, it would likely hinge around official mechanics such as aggression, or alliance status. Your example of whistling wouldn't be appropriate because that's not really a game/side mechanic.

That's just my ideas on it.
"I'm afraid I don't understand. And also afraid that I do."
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.
User avatar
0beron
YOTD + Pins Supporter!
YOTD + Pins Supporter!
 
Posts: 3192
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:52 pm
Location: Morlock Wells

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Lamech » Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:35 pm

0beron wrote:It's likely one of those things that doesn't make sense in our terms but is perfectly clear in Erfworld logic. You can make treaties about non-aggression and alliance and the like, but you can't just draw up a silly agreement with the intent to freely transfer funds.
Alternatively, the penalties for breaking a contract may not actually go to the opposing party, they may literally be a penalty that just vanishes from your treasury into nothingness.

Now, if the first point I raise is true, then it is likely Parson's lateral thinking will lead him to realize he can make a legitimate treaty and then somehow force it to be broken, triggering the transfer. If so, it would likely hinge around official mechanics such as aggression, or alliance status. Your example of whistling wouldn't be appropriate because that's not really a game/side mechanic.

That's just my ideas on it.
I do note that Wanda's father drew up a contract that made an automagical payment to the side which didn't attack him. Actually I think the funnier idea would be to draw up a treaty with a loophole and a big penalty clause.

Say go back to the (failed) parley with Tram.

Parson: You agree not to attack any units in your airspace and we agree not to attack any units in Jetstone for the duration of the negotiations, and for long enough for Ossomer to fly back to the other GK units.
Tram: Deal, now lets talk. We'll let most of your units go, if
Parson: Oh noes! It appears we have been betrayed! Wanda and everyone else has turned to our allies the hobgobwins! And their bombing your units the horror the horror!
Tram: Well we'll just shoot them down. Hey, what why are we a million shmuckers in debt?
Parson: You attacked units in your airspace. You broke the contract. If you surrender we'll give you enough money to pay for upkeep.
Lamech
 
Posts: 1450
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:23 am

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Nnelg » Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:27 am

I think there's more to a contract than just saying those words. Besides, who would agree to such an easily exploitable contract?

For example: Jetstone was demanding surrender, so if Parson refused to parley without a contract they would have just proceeded to obliterate the (then) trapped GK forces.
"The Wizard is Charlie!"
User avatar
Nnelg
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Location: Internets the World of Webs

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby drachefly » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:03 am

I like the 'no one gets the money' solution.
User avatar
drachefly
Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 1647
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:36 pm

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby 0beron » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:26 am

drachefly wrote:I like the 'no one gets the money' solution.

I do too, but then Lord Firebaugh's treaty wouldn't have worked. He arranged that if either Frenemy or Quizling attacked, the OTHER one would receive a payment.
"I'm afraid I don't understand. And also afraid that I do."
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.
User avatar
0beron
YOTD + Pins Supporter!
YOTD + Pins Supporter!
 
Posts: 3192
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:52 pm
Location: Morlock Wells

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Lamech » Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:18 pm

Nnelg wrote:I think there's more to a contract than just saying those words. Besides, who would agree to such an easily exploitable contract?

Someone who didn't think things through. You just miss a loophole or don't think of something.
Lamech
 
Posts: 1450
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:23 am

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby drachefly » Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:03 pm

0beron wrote:
drachefly wrote:I like the 'no one gets the money' solution.

I do too, but then Lord Firebaugh's treaty wouldn't have worked. He arranged that if either Frenemy or Quizling attacked, the OTHER one would receive a payment.


From the aggressor's coffers? Hrm. Yeah.
User avatar
drachefly
Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 1647
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:36 pm

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby 0beron » Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:05 pm

drachefly wrote:
0beron wrote:
drachefly wrote:I like the 'no one gets the money' solution.
I do too, but then Lord Firebaugh's treaty wouldn't have worked. He arranged that if either Frenemy or Quizling attacked, the OTHER one would receive a payment.
From the aggressor's coffers? Hrm. Yeah.

No, from Goodminton's own coffers, but same result. There was a transfer.
"I'm afraid I don't understand. And also afraid that I do."
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.
User avatar
0beron
YOTD + Pins Supporter!
YOTD + Pins Supporter!
 
Posts: 3192
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:52 pm
Location: Morlock Wells

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby drachefly » Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:55 am

0beron wrote:
drachefly wrote:
0beron wrote:[Lord Firebaugh] arranged that if either Frenemy or Quizling attacked, the OTHER one would receive a payment.
From the aggressor's coffers? Hrm. Yeah.

No, from Goodminton's own coffers, but same result. There was a transfer.


Ah, but in that case then it was a voluntary action - and they might have set up an escrow account or something with MK moneymancers. This wasn't spur-of-the-moment, but arranged in advance.
User avatar
drachefly
Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 1647
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:36 pm

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Whispri » Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:37 pm

The thing about the Battle of Goodminton, is the Quisling and Frenemy Warlords were actually in the City, able to fly down and speak with Overlord Firebaugh in person. The gem thing, we've only seen that done at range or when dealing with Barbarians.
Whispri
YOTD + Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
YOTD + Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 9:02 pm

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Nnelg » Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:45 am

Lamech wrote:Someone who didn't think things through. You just miss a loophole or don't think of something.

I mean to say that the mere fact that these contracts are absolutely binding will mean that only the most idiotic of individuals won't stop to think it through first. Of course people like Charlie will still sometimes be able to sneak things through, but as a rule only the very stupid or the very desperate will accept a contract in a rush.

Specifically, it would be a very idiotic move to accept a magically binding contract in a situation where one's word should suffice. For instance, during parley.
"The Wizard is Charlie!"
User avatar
Nnelg
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Location: Internets the World of Webs

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Lamech » Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:19 pm

Nnelg wrote:
Lamech wrote:Someone who didn't think things through. You just miss a loophole or don't think of something.

I mean to say that the mere fact that these contracts are absolutely binding will mean that only the most idiotic of individuals won't stop to think it through first. Of course people like Charlie will still sometimes be able to sneak things through, but as a rule only the very stupid or the very desperate will accept a contract in a rush.

Specifically, it would be a very idiotic move to accept a magically binding contract in a situation where one's word should suffice. For instance, during parley.

After multiple betrayals by the RCCII during parleys?
Lamech
 
Posts: 1450
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:23 am

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby mortissimus » Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:44 pm

0beron wrote:It's likely one of those things that doesn't make sense in our terms but is perfectly clear in Erfworld logic. You can make treaties about non-aggression and alliance and the like, but you can't just draw up a silly agreement with the intent to freely transfer funds.


Sounds reasonable to me. Parson may or may not use it, considering that GK has no lack of gems, they just need to set some aside instead of converting them to the treasury. Of course, Parson may not be with GK for the whole story.

Nnelg wrote:
Lamech wrote:Someone who didn't think things through. You just miss a loophole or don't think of something.

I mean to say that the mere fact that these contracts are absolutely binding will mean that only the most idiotic of individuals won't stop to think it through first. Of course people like Charlie will still sometimes be able to sneak things through, but as a rule only the very stupid or the very desperate will accept a contract in a rush.


And - judging by the scene with Ansom at Gobwin Knob - reading contracts is a free action.
mortissimus
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:04 am

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Nnelg » Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:00 pm

mortissimus wrote:And - judging by the scene with Ansom at Gobwin Knob - reading contracts is a free action.

Not necessarily: a quick skim-through can be enough to identify a contract as blatantly unfair. This specific example falls under the "very desperate" category.


Lamech wrote:
Nnelg wrote:Specifically, it would be a very idiotic move to accept a magically binding contract in a situation where one's word should suffice. For instance, during parley.
After multiple betrayals by the RCCII during parleys?

I'll assume you mean against the RCC by GK.

Anyways, it's especially after multiple betrayals. There's no way that you'll give them anything they could possibly exploit after that. So, it'd be a one-sided contract, or nothing.
"The Wizard is Charlie!"
User avatar
Nnelg
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Location: Internets the World of Webs

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Whispri » Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:45 am

Nnelg wrote:I'll assume you mean against the RCC by GK.

You're joking, right? The RCC II break parley all the time. Pretty much every time they have the chance in fact.
Whispri
YOTD + Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
YOTD + Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 9:02 pm

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Nnelg » Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:09 am

Whispri wrote:You're joking, right? The RCC II break parley all the time. Pretty much every time they have the chance in fact.

Really? Name once.
"The Wizard is Charlie!"
User avatar
Nnelg
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:40 pm
Location: Internets the World of Webs

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Whispri » Sun Oct 14, 2012 12:04 pm

Nnelg wrote:
Whispri wrote:You're joking, right? The RCC II break parley all the time. Pretty much every time they have the chance in fact.

Really? Name once.

Warlord Cruz was murdered during parley on the orders of her mother, Bea, the murderer of Unaroyal. The Don King and Slately rather approved of that particular incident.
Whispri
YOTD + Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
YOTD + Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 9:02 pm

Re: Transfer of funds in Erfworld

Postby Lamech » Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:28 pm

Nnelg wrote:I'll assume you mean against the RCC by GK.
Nope, Unaroyal against GK, and Jillian against Jitterai. If you want to get technical Jillian again when she attacked GK during a parley. You can see Duncan mention "parley again" next comic confirming that it was in fact a parley. Oh and Jillian immediately betrayed Wanda with Kingworld, while claiming that she was still planning on negotiations.

So that's three betrayals of parley. Four if we get technical. And seeing as how they have only gotten four chances to betray during a parley... why would they expect anyone to trust them?
Lamech
 
Posts: 1450
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:23 am

Next

Return to Everything Else Erfworld

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests

cron