

1Luv wrote:I think the small attempt wasn't supposed to be seen as comedic failure, I think it was him trying to avoid meaningless death...




He leaned back in his saddle. "We'll win," he said, with perfect serenity. "I doubt it will even be close."
The Chief Warlord leaned forward in his perch-saddle. For the first time, a little smile crept into his otherwise blank face.
"To win," he said simply.
"You can't win!" shouted Ossomer. His arm swung out, and he pointed behind him without breaking eye contact. "Look at the forces before you!"
The smile broadened, and the Chief Warlord shrugged. "You're really high-strung, you know that?"
He leaned back in his saddle. "We'll win," he said, with perfect serenity. "I doubt it will even be close."
Vordrax wrote:I'm confused. Was this line:He leaned back in his saddle. "We'll win," he said, with perfect serenity. "I doubt it will even be close."
spoken by Ossomer or by the Faq warlord? The serene part doesn't seem to fit with Ossomer (who had just been yelling two lines previously), but the line-break seems to suggest it's not the Faq warlord.
Anybody? Bueller?
My analysis goes something like this:Raza wrote:What's with all this talk of everyone disbanding, though? What is Trammenis, if not a royal heir? AFAWK, you cannot be royal without being either a heir or an overlord. How would he not turn barbarian like Jillian did when her capital fell and king was croaked?
Raza wrote:What's with all this talk of everyone disbanding, though? What is Trammenis, if not a royal heir? AFAWK, you cannot be royal without being either a heir or an overlord. How would he not turn barbarian like Jillian did when her capital fell and king was croaked?



Menlo Marseilles wrote:My analysis goes something like this:Raza wrote:What's with all this talk of everyone disbanding, though? What is Trammenis, if not a royal heir? AFAWK, you cannot be royal without being either a heir or an overlord. How would he not turn barbarian like Jillian did when her capital fell and king was croaked?
Tramennis is a Royal Chief Warlord. Ansom was a Royal Chief Warlord (and probably the heir) at some time in the past. He died, so Slately named Ossomer his Chief Warlord and heir. Ossomer died, and Slately named Tramennis his Chief Warlord, but has not named him heir yet. I'm guessing it needs to be your turn to name an heir - that's the only rule I can think of that fits what we know about Jetstone while still allowing the timing to work out the way everyone on Erf seems to think it will.
MonteCristo wrote:Who says you need to be an heir or a ruler to be a royal?
Royalty is nothing more than a stat in erfworld granted down on those who were popped as an heir to a King or queen... however, the rules apparently do not allow for multiple heir's, so only on you're turn can you reassign who the heir is... Tremmenis was likely popped an heir, but after his brothers were also popped the title of heir was handed over to them by Slately
badninja wrote:That's my man Osss, just attack that warlord and stop Wanda's stupid plan. However I got a serious bad feeling about that conversation I feel that the Lobot clone, what is is name again, just dropped a big hint and the parlay is part of Charlies plan.
Users browsing this forum: Werebiscuit and 4 guests