
Wakky wrote:It seems to me that the Uncwoaked troops are handling being leaderless better than normal troops. They have a natural fanaticism, a fearless nature. Does this mean that Tramenis will have a harder time rolling over them than he thinks? It could be kind of a nasty surprise.

TheCat wrote:One wonders if the enemy leader that Wrigley speared was named Mint.
Tensor wrote:Wrigley rules!
Rob, you just found your diamond character, the one nobody expected to mean much, but everyone loves.


Lady Nerevar wrote:d'aaw, makes me all warm and fuzzy, in a morbid sort of way.


BLANDCorporatio wrote:Yeah, and it's amazing how regular this pattern is (Sammy, Wrigley, You Know Who ...)*. Is this just a usual "rooting for the underdog" bias or does it speak more about this specific audience? Liking characters that are mere pawns caught adrift amidst irresistible and often incomprehensible historical flows ... do they remind us of anyone?
Then they are quite reliably killed off. Makes for good story economy.
Unless your name is Jillian of course, in wich case you can do pretty much everything you want and you won't die no matter how foolish it is.
rkyeun wrote:Roses are red.
Violets are blue.

TheCat wrote:One wonders if the enemy leader that Wrigley speared was named Mint.

Spot wrote:Wrigley came back, and he was no less free in his second life as an Uncroaked, than he was in his first life as a regular unit.
(name here) wrote:Well, that's an interesting insight into unlead stacks. Also, looks like ford took an enemy warlord with him after all.
krko wrote:Trammenis is very much a warlord and has no cape. Duncan too.
badninja wrote:So we see a lowly stabber kill a level 1 warlord. We knew this battle was going to be over fast and it was interesting to see that the forces that where left at the bridge knew that after loosing all their leadership. Nice to see the battle wrap up here but how well everyone react to the return of Parson, the man who brought down Ansom? I feel that everyone but Charlie is going to take this decision worth a grain of salt until it is to late.
oslecamo2 wrote:And those people dying aren't just faceless mooks. They each have their own dreams and mind and ambition. But that doesn't stop the cruel erfworld from taking them.
It's not about introducing interesting characters and them discarding them. It's about showing that people are dying in the middle of all this conflict, not just mindless game miniatures.

Tensor wrote:Wrigley rules!
Rob, you just found your diamond character, the one nobody expected to mean much, but everyone loves.
Dancing Cthulhu wrote:krko wrote:Trammenis is very much a warlord and has no cape. Duncan too.
I don't think they count as normal warlords - chief warlords/princes/princesses tend to have very individualistic looks, while the rest of the Jetstone warlords we have seen have a very similar uniforme. Which isn't to say I disagree - though as I say above I'm not fully sure what the result was. I'm assuming after this battle we'll see Trem getting a report on the losses.
HandofShadows wrote:The vib I am getting from this text update is the Wanda is not the one putting the fanatical loyalty in their Decypted minds. I reall think the Arkenpliers is doing it on it's own.



Fantabulastic wrote:Pretty sure we've seen Wrigley before in the summer updates. Too bad he didn't do better for himself. C'est la vie.
Dancing Cthulhu wrote:(name here) wrote:Well, that's an interesting insight into unlead stacks. Also, looks like ford took an enemy warlord with him after all.
I don't know, that seems like something Wrigley would mention/think on - more important and inspiring then the fact he stabbed and failed to kill the LFN that squashed him, since it would be the one success to come out of Ford's action (charge stopped before getting anywhere near the target, getting his leg cut off and then getting dusted).

Users browsing this forum: Finwe, Google [Bot], Intocabille_CZ, mortissimus and 6 guests