BLANDCorporatio wrote: Charlie's still a way too convenient plot device when it comes to providing an opposition for Parson.




effataigus wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote: Charlie's still a way too convenient plot device when it comes to providing an opposition for Parson.
I don't see why this is a bad thing.
He makes a lot of sense as an main villain (or at least the avatar for a main villain that is just an idea (war)) even though he, unlike many other characters, isn't necessarily aligned against GK. Parson needs a Parson sized-challenge and we haven't met anyone else who seems to be able to give him a run for his money. Charlie is aligned against peace, and this puts him in opposition to the most thoughtful and sane characters (Tramennis, Grand Abbie, Sizemore (even Wanda if you want to call total conquest peace and whatever she is sane). Peace would be devastating for Charlescomm... with one city and no mercenary work he would dwindle down to very little.
On another topic... I just reread the post and wanted to say again that I loved the artwork... and the conversations. Parson's pizza stain is getting a little out of hand though

ftl wrote:The 'bad thing' isn't that Charlie is in opposition to Parson. That makes perfect sense, and he could be a great opponent.
The 'bad thing' is in HOW it seems to happen. Whenever Parson needs some more opposition, Charlie seems to grow an extra power that nobody knew he had. That's what this is seeming like - oh, things might end up looking positive for GK, the solution is more powers for Charlie! I really hope that that doesn't happen and the implication that Charlie is spying on GK is a misdirection, intentional or not.

I remember saying, in the first post here, that having this ability makes sense in some ways. That doesn't change the basic fact, that Charlie is waaaay too powerful and at once very capricious in wielding that power, essentially only using it when it's convenient to the plot.
BLANDCorporatio wrote:Raza wrote:The strategic implications of having previous thinkagrams tapped have been noted, and so far not that big.
Not sure what this means. The ability to eavesdrop on your opponents has always been a prized asset.
ftl wrote:The 'bad thing' is in HOW it seems to happen. Whenever Parson needs some more opposition, Charlie seems to grow an extra power that nobody knew he had. That's what this is seeming like - oh, things might end up looking positive for GK, the solution is more powers for Charlie! I really hope that that doesn't happen and the implication that Charlie is spying on GK is a misdirection, intentional or not.
BLANDCorporatio wrote:splintermute wrote:Dwagons aren't natural allies - they're feral creatures. There's no reason to assume that because he can influence one he can automatically influence the other.
Charlie can hack Eyebooks, and MonteCristo believes that therefore hacking Thinkagrams is not that shocking; oh wait, you believe the same. Similarly, Charlie can influence natural allies; feral creatures that don't even have an allegiance to begin with- not that big a stretch.
BLANDCorporatio wrote:It's been said that Charlie waited for Royals to be desperate. That happened once already, yet Charlie did not interfere. There's a lot of rationalization for that thrown around (some link spell would not have been effective, no diplomatic contact, biding time ...). These ring hollow to me. Charlie wants business, and would gladly have made it so that business flowed back as usual, as soon as possible.
This may not even have required GK to be put down (but a boom head-of-state-shot is also not to be excluded), but whatever it would have required, it seems to me to have been within Charlie's grasp.
After all, Charlescomm, some people claim, considered offering Kingworld free of charge. Even if it wouldn't have saved Unaroyal, it would have made it possible to improve reputation among royals.
Plus, a side with such good intelligence and fast versatile units could have loads of tricks to do. As one example, an archon relay on Unaroyal royalty. So many options when you're nigh omnipotent. And with connections in the MK, and a sympathetic caster in one of the kingdoms, it's weird that nothing AT ALL was tried.
MonteCristo wrote:At Unaroyal however, Wanda had an army that was made up of THOUSANDS... and your assumption that they did not have a lot of archers, is purely that, an assumption... baseless in fact
I base it on the apparent lack of Archers when attacking Jetstone. You'd think a few would have been useful, whatever the real plan for that siege would have been.
Charlie can hack Eyebooks, and MonteCristo believes that therefore hacking Thinkagrams is not that shocking; oh wait, you believe the same. Similarly, Charlie can influence natural allies; feral creatures that don't even have an allegiance to begin with- not that big a stretch.
I remember saying, in the first post here, that having this ability makes sense in some ways. That doesn't change the basic fact, that Charlie is waaaay too powerful and at once very capricious in wielding that power, essentially only using it when it's convenient to the plot.
Because God forbid Trem could have created a good counter plan all by himself. Especially since, supposedly, Jetstone is already at such an advantage that even Parson considers his plan unlikely to succeed. Seriously, do we need Charlie to provide yet more muscle flexing? Can't we believe that some warlord in Erfworld would manage an efficient response to a desperate GK?

ftl wrote:The 'bad thing' is in HOW it seems to happen. Whenever Parson needs some more opposition, Charlie seems to grow an extra power that nobody knew he had. That's what this is seeming like - oh, things might end up looking positive for GK, the solution is more powers for Charlie! I really hope that that doesn't happen and the implication that Charlie is spying on GK is a misdirection, intentional or not.


BLANDCorporatio wrote:It's been said that Charlie waited for Royals to be desperate. That happened once already, yet Charlie did not interfere. There's a lot of rationalization for that thrown around (some link spell would not have been effective, no diplomatic contact, biding time ...). These ring hollow to me. Charlie wants business, and would gladly have made it so that business flowed back as usual, as soon as possible.

SteveMB wrote:cdrcjsn wrote:Umm...did Parson really just give an order to Wanda to stay alive, whatever the cost?
What if that cost is defecting to Charlie?
The real question is how much that order will really influence her. She seems to be convinced that whatever happens will work out because her Fate will triumph in the end, which implies that she's not going to see herself as in any real danger as long as she sticks to Fate's plan (insofar as she understands it), or, conversely, that she already considers surviving long enough for her Fate to play out as her absolute top priority.Whispri wrote:With regards to Parson's order: Jillian has no heir, Wanda could destroy Faq with a stroke of her Pliers. And thanks to that order, she may have to.
Would she? If Wanda is not techically Loyal to Stanley, Parson can't really give her binding orders... except insofar as she decides that sticking with Stanley and Parson is useful in advancing her fate. She does seem to believe that, but isn't not clear just how far that belief will extend when push comes to shove.

mhangman wrote:And he can give whatever command he wants.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests