ParsonIsOP wrote:And he can get to GK by dragon-relay.
Off-turn.
Garrison unit.
I don't think Parson is going anywhere at the moment. Maybe soon, though.
ParsonIsOP wrote:And he can get to GK by dragon-relay.

Ansan Gotti wrote:ParsonIsOP wrote:And he can get to GK by dragon-relay.
Off-turn.
Garrison unit.
I don't think Parson is going anywhere at the moment. Maybe soon, though.

Welf von Ehrwald wrote:Whoa, butchering your own troops, get them into the larder as provisions, then send them to the air column and then decrypt them. That'd be evil. Really. Evil.
Raza wrote:Lol @ rampant speculation. This page will never be as funny again as it is right now to those who've been keeping up with the reactions forum.
And Charlie flat-out lies for the first time in conversation. Apparently he's not quite lawful, just polite.
ParsonIsOP wrote:
The strip is probably trying to imply that Parson will personally take the field. He's telling Maggie that he feels uncomfortable with playing the rear-echelon commander and is putting down his own piece to represent his presence in the battle. Hence, he's going to the armory to get suited-up for battle.
And he can get to GK by dragon-relay.

Dr Pepper wrote:2. He cannot leave the Garrison
zilfallon wrote:[And uhm...What's the deal with lots of posts arguing about a small typo which doesn't make a difference in what we understand at all? Waivered or wavered, i'm pretty sure everyone here understood what Charlie meant there...

effataigus wrote:No sooner had I posted than I thought of a counter to what I had just said:
The only reason I could see that Parson would need to go to the armory to put this plan in motion that Maggie wouldn't have anticipated is if Parson decided that he would croak the units being transported as "food" (i.e. dead spidews or something edible). This would be something I can imagine him thinking he has the responsibility to do now that he is recognizing the moral implications of butchering (and serving) his own troops. Also, he would have a chance of leveling from it, and, if he leveled, it would give his troops on the front line a +1 (assuming CW bonus is 1/3rd round down instead of 1/3rd round up (or to nearest)).
This could be part of a plan to use dead meat as a "brick" weapon, as decryption fodder, or both.
The foreshadowing of him treating himself like a unit would apply equally well to a line of thought about him making himself level as it would to him putting himself in harm's way.
ftl wrote:chanman wrote:.
Stanley wouldn't have it. Remember, we're told that Stanley has an irrational hatred of Charlie. That may very well be a lot more relevant than the Charlie-Parson dynamic - you're right, I wouldn't expect Charlie to take it personally. I'm still maintaining that he hasn't.

chanman wrote:What interests me is whether Charlie knows that the uncroaking of the volcano has greatly enriched GK's treasury. He seems to be the type that would keep track of Parson's turn expenditures. It's probably not the kind of information he would let slip.

chanman wrote:What interests me is whether Charlie knows that the uncroaking of the volcano has greatly enriched GK's treasury. He seems to be the type that would keep track of Parson's turn expenditures. It's probably not the kind of information he would let slip.
atteSmythe wrote:Interesting. Anyone doing so would have to massively overestimate spending, too, since no one outside of GK knows (or should know) that the Decrypted don't cost upkeep. That will change at the beginning of FAQ's next turn, since they'll be responsible for paying the (0-shmucker) upkeep for their captive.
atteSmythe wrote:chanman wrote:What interests me is whether Charlie knows that the uncroaking of the volcano has greatly enriched GK's treasury. He seems to be the type that would keep track of Parson's turn expenditures. It's probably not the kind of information he would let slip.
Interesting. Anyone doing so would have to massively overestimate spending, too, since no one outside of GK knows (or should know) that the Decrypted don't cost upkeep. That will change at the beginning of FAQ's next turn, since they'll be responsible for paying the (0-shmucker) upkeep for their captive.
throwingrocks wrote:atteSmythe wrote:chanman wrote:What interests me is whether Charlie knows that the uncroaking of the volcano has greatly enriched GK's treasury. He seems to be the type that would keep track of Parson's turn expenditures. It's probably not the kind of information he would let slip.
Interesting. Anyone doing so would have to massively overestimate spending, too, since no one outside of GK knows (or should know) that the Decrypted don't cost upkeep. That will change at the beginning of FAQ's next turn, since they'll be responsible for paying the (0-shmucker) upkeep for their captive.
We know Parson can't see stats, and that this is supposed to be an inherent ability of Erfworld (hence the 3-D glasses for Parson), but has it been said yet definitively whether or not units can see the stats of enemy or non-allied units?
build6 wrote:chanman wrote:What interests me is whether Charlie knows that the uncroaking of the volcano has greatly enriched GK's treasury. He seems to be the type that would keep track of Parson's turn expenditures. It's probably not the kind of information he would let slip.atteSmythe wrote:Interesting. Anyone doing so would have to massively overestimate spending, too, since no one outside of GK knows (or should know) that the Decrypted don't cost upkeep. That will change at the beginning of FAQ's next turn, since they'll be responsible for paying the (0-shmucker) upkeep for their captive.
The economics of GK is definitely something GK's enemies - at least those with any strategic thinkers - would have to think about. And that the decrypted have no upkeep is a really game-imbalancing factor since that means there's no upper limit to the forces you can field.
I'd think that Charlie and the RCC2 would at least suspect there's no upkeep requirement for the decrypted anyway - I mean, the "rules" clearly don't apply to GK/Wanda anymore considering decryption is such an "impossible" thing anyway
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests