BLANDCorporatio wrote:atalex wrote:I'd just like to point out how brilliant this turn of phrase is:"So who cares if he's [Tramennis] a— If his Signamancy is less...than manly." Slately cleared his throat. "I certainly don't. Any more. He ought to lead."
It allows Slately to admit that his bias against Tram was the result of homophobia but without using the word "homosexuality" -- which is a word that logically should not exist in Erfworld since it is a world without procreative sex where sexual activity is purely for personal pleasure. Brilliant.
And here I go to be contrarian. Because your interpretation is spot-on, were Slately an Earth character. But like you said, there's no reason why homophobia should exist at all in Erfworld. There's not even a clearly delineated notion of "regular" gender roles, for crying out loud!
So I'll interpret Slately as referring merely to Trem's less-than-imposing physique.
omgitsgene wrote:Gaius Iulius Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Gallico is still studied by contemporary military strategists.
Actually, I think he looks a lot more like Octavius, who styled himself Augustus Caesar if I'm not mistaken.
Oberon wrote:C'mon now, this is just a bit farcical. You are emphasizing the "familiar" portion of that quote and concluding that since Stupidworld has homophobia that Erf must. But if Parson was vehemently against homophobia and felt that homophobes were dangerous radicals, the "safe" portion of that quote would be violated.
Cyrus wrote:So Slately's failure to find a euphemism he was willing to speak aloud is clearly meant to indicate that he fears Tram is a man who loves men. The next logical consequence of this is that Tram's man-crush on Lord Hamster isn't just a man-crush. Is Tram really at risk of falling in love with the architect of his brothers' downfall, soon-to-be his father's downfall, approaching his side's downfall.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests