

skarl wrote:is that fat one with the mustache obelix?
the_tick_rules wrote:He might. I'm guessing he doesn't have any now though, this seems like an impulsive "it's not a game anymore" decision.
joosy wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote:joosy wrote:I predict a big attitude shift if Jillian ever learns that it was Wanda who betrayed Faq to Stanley. Not that Stanley will now be her love interest
And why not?
I just threw up in my mouth a lot there.
No one in particular wrote:FACT: From the flash mob, we know that flashing is a form of shockamancy.
FACT: From van de graff and other various lightning bolts, we know the 'Hammer can use shockamancy.
CONCLUSION: At some point in the future, we will see a totally naked Stanely charging in to battle.
There's your fan "service"!
joosy wrote:I also like the subtle revisit to the story's underlying theme of the role love and personal choice/freedom play in thwarting Fate's advances.
Also.. the automatic rejection of any previous noble titles of the decrypted (first seen in Ansom) has me wonder if there is more to the whole "Re-Popped Again" religion they keep preaching. At first I thought it was just Ansom's way of rationalizing his new found existence and that it became a popular meme among those that followed in his re-creation but now? Hmmm..


No one in particular wrote:FACT: From the flash mob, we know that flashing is a form of shockamancy.
FACT: From van de graff and other various lightning bolts, we know the 'Hammer can use shockamancy.
CONCLUSION: At some point in the future, we will see a totally naked Stanely charging in to battle.
There's your fan "service"!

udat wrote:I think that's the best Wanda has looked in Book 2!
Zeku wrote:Wanda herself is also a religious nutbag, which can only be interpreted as a personal hypocrisy, given the violence of her actions. She has no vision, and thus is doomed to be a tragic figure.


Pet nitpick on the "tragic figure". Which sense of tragic is this?
Because I can totally see Wanda as a classical tragic (anti)hero, meaning an exceptional and flawed being wrestling against forces much greater than themselves. Hubris is one way to bring the tragic hero down. So is hypocrisy. A lack of vision is usually not the failure of the tragic hero- oh, they have vision alright, but the gods don't take kindly to it.

Grimnir wrote:Is Sizemore going to cross through the portal as well? He is a very powerful caster and could be useful in this situation.
"He didn't order you through, did he? You're not going through this portal...!
"No," sighed Sizemore. He did not look up at all.


Zeku wrote:Then add the pliers. The power of the pliers is insane. We've been spared the conversion of any sympathetic characters,
Zeku wrote:but being enslaved by them is an instant re-write of loyalties and passions. You could argue that the core character is preserved, but the imagery is again religious: I'm reminded of Lucifer saying something like 'Id rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.' A person's biases can be so strong, that they will intentionally endure pain rather than accept change, even if that change will result in an improvement to their life. (You could argue that it is death itself that produces the change, but the pliers complete the process.)
Wanda wields the power to recreate anyone in her own image, and all we've seen so far is that she is 'pursuing the will of the Titans?' She's daft. She has no anchor, and is thereby, a nobody. Someone like Charlie (or Parson) will wield that power through her, and she will gain nothing by being the true owner of it. This is a tragic figure. Like Stanley, she is just a servant of forces she will never perceive.


BLANDCorporatio wrote:joosy wrote:Also.. the automatic rejection of any previous noble titles of the decrypted (first seen in Ansom) has me wonder if there is more to the whole "Re-Popped Again" religion they keep preaching. At first I thought it was just Ansom's way of rationalizing his new found existence and that it became a popular meme among those that followed in his re-creation but now? Hmmm..
It kinda still works on that level. Meaning, Nobles were committed by Duty to one cause whi*WHAM* now they're committed to another cause opposed to Nobility, and bound by Duty (and maybe more) to it. What other explanations are palatable, than the hope that the old cause is doomed? And, you know, not the ability of the Universe to play fast and loose with their very souls?
mortissimus wrote:Do for certain if they retain their decrypted retains their nobility/royalty flag in game terms? (As they are unlikely to rule, this would mainly affect their leveling, if I recall correctly.)
If they do not, it would be typical Erfworld if they feel it is no longer important.


I am having some trouble following the argument here, in that I don't see what the religious imagery (Lucifer preferring to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven) has to do with the ability to instantly reconfigure Loyalties.
Users browsing this forum: Xarx and 2 guests