Sieggy wrote:Uuummm . . . I kinda have to ask what good an archer with no arrows is going to be
It was specified that a few arrows were held in reserve. I'd hate to have to hunt it up, though.
Sieggy wrote:Uuummm . . . I kinda have to ask what good an archer with no arrows is going to be

Sieggy wrote:Uuummm . . . I kinda have to ask what good an archer with no arrows is going to be. In none of the art have we seen any full quivers carried by any of the troops on the tower, in fact I went back and looked, and page 53 was the last one where they were even seen carrying bows. Given that Parson gave orders to wait until the volleys stopped before doing the Decrypts, I am assuming the archers ran out of ammo whereupon Wanda did her thing. But since then, the archers have just been standing there doing nothing, not even with bows in their hands. So . . . did Cubbins nobly sacrifice his life for nothing . . ?
Edit - the archers on Unis on P. 73 look like they might have bows slung, but none of the archers on the current page are shown as being armed in any manner. Unless their bows are magical and can be resized for stowage, I have to wonder where they came from?



GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.


And the sky was ablaze with light.



Kandarin wrote:And the sky was ablaze with light.
I interpreted this to mean that the reason he stayed behind was to fire off all of Spacerock's air defenses while there was still a tower to fire them from. No matter how many Leadership and item bonuses they have, the King and Prince are still going up against a huge fleet of Archons and Cubbins saw it as his Duty to do whatever he could to even that score.


Especially if the titans do indeed have tinkle holes. But, hold off on that moment of silence for a while...Xenon wrote:a moment of silence for a noble mancer, who has more testes than the titans.
Meh. Heroic sacrifice aside, Cubbins saved the first archer at no cost and some risk. He then saved a second archer at extremely high cost and high risk. Such a high cost and risk that one wonders how his duty would allow such a foolish action. Archers probably pop a dozen or more per turn, while casters pop rarely in place of warlord pops, which are either single unit per turn pops or worse, they may be several turn pops for a single unit. And Cubbins had a high degree of synergy with Ace, without the need for a bi-mancer link. There is no justification for his sacrifice in favor of a mere two archery units, and much less for a single archery unit.Cruiser1 wrote:Cubbins' noble sacrifice to provide two extra Jetstone archers (with Ossomer's high leadership bonus) should be enough to allow the King to escape, while taking out enough Archons in the process to promote Tramennis if need be. Meanwhile, Parson and Wanda (if they actually enter/return to Jetstone) may finally get a chance to determine if a decrypted caster can still cast!
Zeroberon wrote:So we know with 100% certainty that THIS IS HOW TRI-LINKS WORK, PERIOD END OF STORY.

Oberon wrote: Such a high cost and risk that one wonders how his duty would allow such a foolish action. Archers probably pop a dozen or more per turn, while casters pop rarely in place of warlord pops, which are either single unit per turn pops or worse, they may be several turn pops for a single unit. And Cubbins had a high degree of synergy with Ace, without the need for a bi-mancer link. There is no justification for his sacrifice in favor of a mere two archery units, and much less for a single archery unit.

Kreistor wrote:And he might survive the fall, anyway.
drachefly wrote:I'd be a lot more sanguine about survival odds if they didn't have a roof above their heads to fall on them right after they're done landing.


BLANDCorporatio wrote:I'm not sure I understand the calculation, if any (I don't buy that two Archers were a better choice with Ossomer returned, for example), but that doesn't mean there was no reason for the decision made.

teratorn wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote:I'm not sure I understand the calculation, if any (I don't buy that two Archers were a better choice with Ossomer returned, for example), but that doesn't mean there was no reason for the decision made.
With Ossomer returned and his huge bonus those archers are worth a lot.


BLANDCorporatio wrote:I don't think Ossomer's turning is the decider here. If Ossomer would not have turned, for example, THEN, would it have been better for Cubbins to go? Probably not. Roughly speaking, a bonus acts like a factor multiplying a combat value. If Cubbins' is 0, it would be 0 with or without Oss' bonus.
