

Rob Balder wrote:We have one rule in these forums: don't be a dick.

Steve-D wrote:That's one hell of a cliff hanger. Please tell me we don't have to wait until the spring for book 3.

GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.




M.A.D wrote:Also, let's see, a parody character, some pun on Popcap, and... end of issue? o.O


Kaed wrote:I think the most likely explaination of Cubbins holding back is that this particular spell could only be performed in a tower. Why this is is less clear though. Perhaps the tower bonus to casters was responsible, or perhaps he did indeed use the tower defenses, empowering them with Hat Magic for a final assault.
But here's something else I don't think anyone has considered - if he is not in the airspace with everyone else, the Archons cannot target him. Whereas he most certainly can. Since his ploy is obviously one of diversion - though it is doing some damage, no one is really dusting - as long as he is on the tower and still has juice the Archons will be occupied, giving the flying group time to escape the hex. Had he gone with the flyers I expect they would have immediately nuked him when he started doing this.
drachefly wrote:Steve-D wrote:That's one hell of a cliff hanger. Please tell me we don't have to wait until the spring for book 3.
This isn't, so far as I know, the end of book 2. It's the end of issue 2 of book 2.



Waaaaaait... are you serious? I thought it was sarcasm at first but, by the end of the post, I realized it wasn't. I then cried all of the tears.Kreistor wrote:Okay, so what did we learn?
There was no indication that anyone besides Ossomer turned. In fact, the comic to this point STILL says otherwise. Ossomer was discontent, Ossomer was mopey, and Ossomer was alone. Were it anyone besides our favorite slab of beef, we'd have been told about them, too.Kreistor wrote:1. Archons haven't Turned, so maybe only Ossomer has. May still include former Jetstone Units in Dungeon.
... Contrary to popular belief, a good writer doesn't need to lie to his (or her) audience to achieve a good story. Once or twice (DDR, here's lookin' at you!) a good misdirection is perfectly valid/ useful for creating tension... But seriously? I might not be "up" on the latest discussions as well as I should've been/ should be, but is that honestly a debate that was/ is taking place? What does Rob add to the story by lying to us without any foreshadowing whatsoever?Kreistor wrote:2. Ossomer really Turned, and it's not Foolamancy. Archons see through Foolamancy. This greatly suggests Wanda and Jack really are in the MK. (Morons.)
I took Bun-bun/ the rest of the glowing things to be part of a spell. The Hat Magician used magic...and a hat. No live creatures (as far as we know).Kreistor wrote:4. Hat Magicians can produce live creatures (rabbits in the case, but may just be a visual issue and could produce anything).
4a. By "produce", it may be "store and remove" instead of "create from nothing".
Rob Balder wrote:We have one rule in these forums: don't be a dick.

Atomic wrote:Archons don't automatically see through Foolamancy.Kreistor wrote:Archons see through Foolamancy.
Users browsing this forum: elecampane, ManaCaster and 11 guests