
zz_tophat wrote:Hatu wrote:Interesting development. Poor dwagon.
I notice we're missing the "Turns since tBfGK" counter. Is that no longer needed, or was it an unintentional omission?
-H
Better question: why are they still called "summer" updates? (This posted while I literally watch the leaves change color).
Hari Seldon wrote: the guest art for Summer Update 032 shows a catapult pointed the direction Parson is going - away from the city.

LordDarksea wrote:There's a part of me that's wondering if the Archon's filming isn't part of a residual order left behind from Charlie. Could it be possible that decrypting wouldn't override that compulsion, unless Wanda, Stanley, Ansom or Parson actively tells them not to transmit these things?
I can't really see it happening, because of how decrypting totally re-wrote Ansom's perspective. It seems that the Archon's would be similarly re-written, but if its implanted into their minds that transmitting such information is a) what they do and b) not a betrayal of their side then i guess it could be possible.
Taking into account that they are the specialist units of the Arkendish (is that canon? or am I just assuming/inferring it?), it may be that feeding back everything of importance to the Arkendish is integral to their nature regardless of who their loyalty is to, and if somebody just happens to be attuned to the Arkendish then they get that info.
Wild speculation, probably well off base, but it just seems to me a possibility.

balder wrote:Update 23: Elddonnamar originally had a Gobwin chef standing in the doorway, but I have not said that there are still any Gobwins in the city. Book 1 says none survived the volcano.


balder wrote:I noticed this detail when I got the art. It is wrong; Parson and Banana fell on the inner side of the wall and did not leave the city. There was not time to have Eugene correct it. I knew someone was going to fixate on it, too.
random_guy wrote:Since warlords command through natural thinkamancy, it seems like it is possible for non-humanoids to be warlords. I wonder if there are any other considerations that would have prevented Stanley from promoting dwagons to warlords.
random_guy wrote:Since warlords command through natural thinkamancy, it seems like it is possible for non-humanoids to be warlords. I wonder if there are any other considerations that would have prevented Stanley from promoting dwagons to warlords.

Drifter wrote:random_guy wrote:Since warlords command through natural thinkamancy, it seems like it is possible for non-humanoids to be warlords. I wonder if there are any other considerations that would have prevented Stanley from promoting dwagons to warlords.
Per my post for the previous update, ( viewtopic.php?f=2&t=509#p9204 ) I really doubt there can be beast/mount warlords.
'gotta remember, Erfworld is a narrative story, and as such, the principal and supporting characters (who tend to be warlords or casters) will need to be identifiable to the readers. IE: we must be able to identify/empathize with the characters. They will have to be able to speak and maintain a worldview of a walking, talking person.
Now, the story may call for gobwin or marbit warlords, but they've both shown enough personality throughout Book 1 that they also fit this criteria. (Remember the gobwin scout's alarm at finding Webinar's stack on pg. 109? That's something we, as readers, can certainly understand and internalize.)
Personally, I have nothing against dwa, er, dragons or other beasts being sentient and/or intelligent as men/elves/other humanoids. I just don't believe they would fit within the framework of the narrative of Erfworld.


Drifter wrote:'gotta remember, Erfworld is a narrative story, and as such, the principal and supporting characters (who tend to be warlords or casters) will need to be identifiable to the readers. IE: we must be able to identify/empathize with the characters. They will have to be able to speak and maintain a worldview of a walking, talking person.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests