

JenBurdoo wrote:Wow.
Dwagon Expwess is truly a fine idea, but if it is possible, how does it make any sense that no one has hit upon it by now? It sounds like movement is tied to units that can ride, and not to their mounts. Normally I would think the mount just extends the move of the rider, but if they can switch mounts, this is gamebreaking! You can transfer your most powerful units to the other side of the realm at a turn's notice. Is it at all possible that dwagons (or perhaps other flying mounts) can carry more than one unit?
JenBurdoo wrote:Wanda's apparent reliance on Parson is understandably unnerving. Why is she doing it?






JenBurdoo wrote:Wow.
Dwagon Expwess is truly a fine idea, but if it is possible, how does it make any sense that no one has hit upon it by now? It sounds like movement is tied to units that can ride, and not to their mounts. Normally I would think the mount just extends the move of the rider, but if they can switch mounts, this is gamebreaking! You can transfer your most powerful units to the other side of the realm at a turn's notice. Is it at all possible that dwagons (or perhaps other flying mounts) can carry more than one unit?
Wanda's apparent reliance on Parson is understandably unnerving. Why is she doing it?


JenBurdoo wrote:Wanda's apparent reliance on Parson is understandably unnerving. Why is she doing it?
Lord Kasavin wrote:Ansom answered that quite well, flying mounts are a luxury. Certainly, the idea of switching mounts to gain more movement has been around for some time as Traemennis just did an update ago.


HailGreen28 wrote:3. Jetstone is simply the only side strong enough alone to challenge Stanley: Again, that may justify Ansom's strategy.
Ansom seems to think of a conventional atttack, like in his assault of Gobwin Knob.


gameboy1234 wrote:I think this is another overly-complicated scheme by Ansom and it's going to get counter-attacked after a feigned surrender or feigned retreat by Jetstone.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests