Saladman wrote:Many teas and cakes will know what it is to be roasted in the stomachs of the court this day I can tell you!
Props to you, man. Love it when people respond to an obscure reference with an even more obscure one from the same source.
Really though. I think I hate this side extra, if this is really how they spend their time. I've always found philosophy to be mildly pointless and pretentious at times, but none so much as debate about the nature of reality and how much of it is perception or illusion. These tedious debates can last hours and, like here, are held by people with a weak grasp of the reality they are talking about. I doubt any of these people have seen more than a couple battles, and probably never taken a hit since the turn they were popped.
Jillian, help that woman out. Stab her with your tea spoon, so she can figure out whether injuries are foolamancy or not.