Arky wrote:The thing is that she's not even being tortured for information. Wanda could have already obtained the location of FAQ from the uncroaked. There's nothing of substance Jillian can tell Wanda that Wanda couldn't have obtained in two minutes flat in another way. This is all about Wanda's sheer crazy.

Whispri wrote:0beron wrote:Whispri wrote:The Side may already be gone at that, the stories told of Faq (and yes, the memories relating to them) in Books One and Two could have been fabricated after all.
I find that HIGHLY unlikely, if not altogether impossible. While it'd be possible to implant false memories of the actual Fall, fabricating Wanda's (apparently) long time with FAQ would not be feasible. And even if it were, where would her prediction about wielding a 'Tool come from? How could she have contacted Stanley? And there is also the fact that Haffaton clearly falls before FAQ, and by a pretty respectable time period as well.
You uh, do realise that the number of surviving people from old Faq can be counted on one hand, right? There's almost nothing to fake. As for your questions, the Magick Kingdom and by Thinkagram. As for your theory regarding the timing of Haffaton's end, Jillian is currently Level 7. By the time of TBfGK, she'll be Level 9. And as can be seen here, Artemis hopped from 7 to 8 in less than five hundred Turns despite spending most of that time sitting around doing Boop all. Jillian kills things all the time, so she [i]really[/] should Level far faster than Artemis did. You see where I'm going with this?
elecampane wrote:Somehow I don't see this being implanted memory: the whole beutiful emotional shade of this update would be worthless then.
The same update proves that while Wanda was on FAQ's side, things were quiet at least for a while.

Whispri wrote:elecampane wrote:Somehow I don't see this being implanted memory: the whole beutiful emotional shade of this update would be worthless then.
The same update proves that while Wanda was on FAQ's side, things were quiet at least for a while.
a)Jack's mind is by his own admittance, in tatters, b) That conversation could easily have occured elsewhere if it matters.
Even if the conversation did occur and did so where and when the madman thinks it does, all it proves is that Jillian was outside the Capital while Wanda was inside it, for a period of time of indeterminate length.
Whispri wrote:You uh, do realise that the number of surviving people from old Faq can be counted on one hand, right? There's almost nothing to fake.
Jack is a FOOLAMANCER. His whole JOB/study focuses around observing the world as it is, and how he and others perceive it, so he can make better illusions. If anyone would fail to be fooled by false memories, it'd be a Master-Class Foolamancer.Arky wrote:there hasn't been a single hint elsewhere of Jack having false memories.
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.


0beron wrote:Whispri wrote:You uh, do realise that the number of surviving people from old Faq can be counted on one hand, right? There's almost nothing to fake.
"Nothing?" Let's run through a list of things that'd have to be faked:All of these would be hard to fake, especially for someone who IS NOT A PROPER THINKAMANCER. The first 2 involve Love, which is confirmed as a "power" that no magical school has been able to claim mastery of, and the 4th one involves giving false information to more people than just surviving FAQ units. And there is also the absence of Haffaton as I mentioned, which I don't feel can be explained away as easily as you tried to. Haffaton must be in territory where GK is right now, because we know it has gobbled up all of FAQ's neighbors except Transylvito. GK and Transylvito are in opposite directions from FAQ's perspective, so it's impossible that Haffaton doesn't occupy GK territory as we know it.
- A Jillian/Wanda love affair.
- Jack's longtime crush on Wanda.
- Wanda's familiarity with Jack and Marie (by this I mean she is friends with them, and is close with Jack)
- Stanley's attack on FAQ
Kreistor wrote:This is getting drawn out far too long. This didn't develop any character that we were not already aware of. Time to move on with the story. Please?
bladestorm wrote:...units having senses other than sight that can be manipulated. If these are Croakamancer spells, this gives us a lot more insight into what a Croakamancer can do...
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.


bladestorm wrote:Sounds like somebody needs a nap.
We are getting to see just how far gone Wanda is, and this scene may be setting up a parallel between Wanda's torture at being a Haffaton unit and Jillian's torture in the box.
We are also getting some insight into some of the mechanics, such as units having senses other than sight that can be manipulated.
If these are Croakamancer spells
Kreistor wrote:This is getting drawn out far too long. This didn't develop any character that we were not already aware of. Time to move on with the story. Please?


Kreistor wrote:lots of arguing and blatant assumptions


Kaed wrote:Croakamancy involves the manipulation of living tissue, repairing it and bringing it back to a rough semblance of life. It's not hard to speculate that it could also be used to DAMAGE it, by, say, destroying ones eyes and ears ability to function?
effataigus wrote:The "heals fully at dawn" thing removes most of my empathy for Erfworlder physical anguish. If you remove the fear of being crippled, then there is very little reason for an organism to feel pain from anything short of near-deadly experiences. In my experience, the only pain that REALLY gets to me is the one that convinces me that I'll never be whole again afterward.
bladestorm wrote:I'd argue that it mostly involves manipulation of no-longer-living tissue, but that's a minor nitpick. I do concur that Croakamancy would be much more interesting if, in addition to adding Movement to unliving flesh to make it have a semblance of life, it could also be used to necrotize living flesh, weaken the body, and deprive the senses. It weakens the living and strengthens the dead. This would give Croakamancers much more use in combat than increasing troop numbers from fallen warriors (from either side of the conflict). I am all for versatility among casters.
Forum wrote:Users browsing this forum: 0beron, Beeskee, Kaed, Oberon and 3 guests


GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.


Kaed wrote:effataigus wrote:The "heals fully at dawn" thing removes most of my empathy for Erfworlder physical anguish. If you remove the fear of being crippled, then there is very little reason for an organism to feel pain from anything short of near-deadly experiences. In my experience, the only pain that REALLY gets to me is the one that convinces me that I'll never be whole again afterward.
So... inflicting horrible agony and psychological trauma is OK, as long as it has no lasting physical effects?
Interesting philosophy. >_>bladestorm wrote:I'd argue that it mostly involves manipulation of no-longer-living tissue, but that's a minor nitpick. I do concur that Croakamancy would be much more interesting if, in addition to adding Movement to unliving flesh to make it have a semblance of life, it could also be used to necrotize living flesh, weaken the body, and deprive the senses. It weakens the living and strengthens the dead. This would give Croakamancers much more use in combat than increasing troop numbers from fallen warriors (from either side of the conflict). I am all for versatility among casters.
Well yeah. It's always kind of bothered me how broad Erfworld disciplines tend to, while Croakamancy seems to do only ONE THING. I think we're just not seeing some of its other abilities until now.Forum wrote:Users browsing this forum: 0beron, Beeskee, Kaed, Oberon and 3 guests
*boggles*
0beron wrote:I don't think he was saying its "acceptable", rather that his personal experience/mentality is that he is only scared by things which he thinks might permanently injure him physically.
...
So I think what he could be subconsciously implying is that this could in part explain Jillian's resilience. If she believes she is under little risk of being permanently damaged, she has little to fear.


Users browsing this forum: effataigus, Werebiscuit and 7 guests