Book 2 – Page 89

Page by page discussion of the comic.

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby bladestorm » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:16 pm

Ansan Gotti wrote:Maybe you're right about what would be objectively best for the side, but personally the scene feels more "real" to me the way he reacted, and it makes me appreciate the character more. Way more than if he had just reacted like a Vulcan or a robot.

Or a decrypted. Both Ansom and Ossomer went very tactical shortly after they were decrypted, puzzled as to why their mistress would not follow the logical path of conquest.
bladestorm
 
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 10:11 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby Beeskee » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:17 pm

Woah. Okay, no more teddy bears and rainbows, huh Charlie?

Damn, he is creepy. :D
User avatar
Beeskee
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:25 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby M.A.D » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:21 pm

So, Charlie is making a pawn and a fool (King for a Day) out of Double Stately. Am I right to think that regardless of whether it would succeed, it would end badly for Jetstone?
M.A.D
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby Beeskee » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:24 pm

I get the distinct impression that Charlie is using Jetstone, yes. Other than their use in accomplishing his own goals, he doesn't seem to care about them one way or another.
User avatar
Beeskee
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:25 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby Jorgath » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:25 pm

M.A.D wrote:So, Charlie is making a pawn and a fool (King for a Day) out of Double Stately. Am I right to think that regardless of whether it would succeed, it would end badly for Jetstone?


It's a cardinal rule of Erfworld since Parson was summoned: It always ends badly for Jetstone.
"It matters not how strait the gait,
how charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul."
--William Ernest Henley, Invictus

Avatar by SteveMB
User avatar
Jorgath
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:58 am

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby zbeeblebrox » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:25 pm

Kreistor wrote:Further, Charlie may have drawn all of those visuals from Parson's mind during that discussion. The Joker image is classic Joker (Killing Joke version, I think, NOT Heath Ledger's imperfect variant. Parson left Erfworld prior to Heath's version being released.


It's absolutely Heath Ledger's version. There's never been a comic version of the Joker depicting him with scars by his mouth. That was unique to The Dark Knight. But it should be noted that the line he's quoting is from Tim Burton's '89 Batman film, not TDK. That's also the puzzle link between The Joker and "Beetlejuice" (who's name is spelled "Betelgeuse" in the film). Betelgeuse is the name of a star, which links him to Khan. Khan is a tyrant who was trapped in suspended animation, which links him to General Zod who was a tyrant trapped in suspended animation. General Zod connects to Agent Smith...for a few possible reasons but it's not entirely clear (Neo is like superman? Superman 2 and the Matrix were both filmed by two directors?). Agent Smith connects to Dr. Gero because they're both robots/cybernetic/whatever. Dr. Gero connects with Dr. Doom because "Dr". Doom connects with Palpatine because they're both disfigured rulers who wear hoods.
"The rumors which surround me are myriad, you know. Myth and legend, wild speculation, paranoid suspicions..."
- Charlie, in reference to the forum members
zbeeblebrox
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby bladestorm » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:42 pm

Beeskee wrote:I get the distinct impression that Charlie is using Jetstone, yes. Other than their use in accomplishing his own goals, he doesn't seem to care about them one way or another.

That's Charlie's MO. Maintain 'neutrality', play other sides against each other, and make a profit from both sides of the conflict.

Feed Jetstone some lies about Parson being a threat to Royalty, and that could call in the entire RCC II to defeat Parson, with Charlie making a mice tidy sum for the services he could provide. Charlie doesn't actually attack Parson, but Parson gets attacked. Instead of using Archons to kill off gobwins, send a huge chunk of money to the neabry Marbits, who have to spend that money to either pop provision, pop new units, or promote units... then let them dispose of the gobwins. Charlie keeps his hands clean while letting others do his dirty work. He's just setting up to have a lot of pawns to do his work for him -- Marbits, Faq, Jetstone, Hagar, TV, RCC II (and anyone else holding into Royalty), a handful of casters in the MK, etc.
bladestorm
 
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 10:11 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby bladestorm » Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:52 pm

zbeeblebrox wrote:
Kreistor wrote:Further, Charlie may have drawn all of those visuals from Parson's mind during that discussion. The Joker image is classic Joker (Killing Joke version, I think, NOT Heath Ledger's imperfect variant. Parson left Erfworld prior to Heath's version being released.


It's absolutely Heath Ledger's version. There's never been a comic version of the Joker depicting him with scars by his mouth. That was unique to The Dark Knight. But it should be noted that the line he's quoting is from Tim Burton's '89 Batman film, not TDK. That's also the puzzle link between The Joker and "Beetlejuice" (who's name is spelled "Betelgeuse" in the film). Betelgeuse is the name of a star, which links him to Khan. Khan is a tyrant who was trapped in suspended animation, which links him to General Zod who was a tyrant trapped in suspended animation. General Zod connects to Agent Smith...for a few possible reasons but it's not entirely clear (Neo is like superman? Superman 2 and the Matrix were both filmed by two directors?). Agent Smith connects to Dr. Gero because they're both robots/cybernetic/whatever. Dr. Gero connects with Dr. Doom because "Dr". Doom connects with Palpatine because they're both disfigured rulers who wear hoods.

Burton also directed Beetlejuice, just a year before Batman with Keaton (who played Beetlejuice), where the main opponent was the Joker.
bladestorm
 
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 10:11 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby VoidLord » Wed Sep 19, 2012 3:04 pm

My 2 cents.

1. Carnymancy. It can rig the rules. We know it can be used to stop an wounded unit from dieing at the end of turn. Could it be used to stop Double-Slately from Vanishing?

2. I think charlie is not just going after parson because hes a threat to his mercanery organization. My theory is that charlie is running some sort of massive masterplan for all of erfworld (which the thinkamancers might know of some (or at least suspect something)) While im not sure what that exactly is, charlie can not afford to have someone threaten the status quo (aka kingdoms fighting wars everywhere). Parson is not just a threat to that by helping gobwin knob win wars, Chrlie might think he is a threat to the status quo of erfworld itself (not even just the constant wars, possibly due to his outsiderness he might be a threat to the very rule/wargame structure of the world(the casters (thinkmancers predictamencers and janis) apparently think something along these lines ("break the world itself")) and whatever charlies masterplan is he cant have the world altered if it is to come to pass.
VoidLord
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby oslecamo2_temp » Wed Sep 19, 2012 3:30 pm

Ansan Gotti wrote:
oslecamo2_temp wrote:He's still the chief warlord. He above everybody else is suposed to keep calm, focused and start asking "what do we have left, and how do we live to fight another day?"


Part of good writing is to convey a very real "human" element to a character, and IMO people do the story a disservice (as well as decrease their own enjoyment, probably) to try to make a character either react the way they think they ought to react, or to view the character from a too-detached, objective place.

Maybe you're right about what would be objectively best for the side, but personally the scene feels more "real" to me the way he reacted, and it makes me appreciate the character more. Way more than if he had just reacted like a Vulcan or a robot.


Allow me to point you to this page, 3rd panel, where we see a real warlord in action.

Crap falling from the sky, one arm melted, yet that warlord stands firm and decided.

Trems meanwhile is all "Pfft, what do I care about their lives, I'll just ask for an inedmization later. Distant money over well-trained troops any day baby!"

So disciplined non-decrypted warlords do exist, and thus Trems still has no valid excuse for going all whiny, proving he's simply a fool that only reached his place because he happens to be a prince and all his brothers got killed. So I don't complain he reacting like the fool he is, I simply complain that he's a fool that's been dragging his side to ruin ever since he became a CW.
Formerly oslecamo2, unable to acess old acount.
oslecamo2_temp
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:08 am

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby effataigus » Wed Sep 19, 2012 3:51 pm

oslecamo2_temp wrote:I always felt it was somewhat perverse the fact you can promote pawns into queens. :D

So you can make your own harem? And were they all women to begin with? :lol:


I dunno. I'd rather be made a queen than a castle. Can't help but think of the Great Wall of China...

Sweet update!
Last edited by effataigus on Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:31 am, edited 239044 times in total.
User avatar
effataigus
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:49 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby Joe22c. » Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:13 pm

0beron wrote:
Ambug666 wrote:Didn't The Joker show up as one of the background -mancers in the Magic Kingdom, or am I misremembering?

It's possible. Rob isn't above using a reference twice in different ways (Case and point, Jack is a constant reference to the Joker)...


Jack is not a reference to the Joker. Well he could be, but I'm 95% sure he was intended to be a reference to, 'the Fool' in Shakespeare's, "King Lear"

See book 1.
Joe22c.
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 4:01 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby Varidan » Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:16 pm

I logged in just to say that, while the joker is much darker and sinister, that last panel would have been perfect if it featured Smeagol saying "We kill the fat one." At least, more on the humerous side. But i guess it wouldnt have fit the mood of this page very well.
Varidan
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 3:28 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby bladestorm » Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:30 pm

Joe22c. wrote:
0beron wrote:
Ambug666 wrote:Didn't The Joker show up as one of the background -mancers in the Magic Kingdom, or am I misremembering?

It's possible. Rob isn't above using a reference twice in different ways (Case and point, Jack is a constant reference to the Joker)...


Jack is not a reference to the Joker. Well he could be, but I'm 95% sure he was intended to be a reference to, 'the Fool' in Shakespeare's, "King Lear"

See book 1.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6igk ... o3_400.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_be6UWCLP7bU/S ... signed.jpg

The 'nuncle' part definitely comes from Lear. Characters aren't tied to a single reference.
Last edited by bladestorm on Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
bladestorm
 
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 10:11 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby fehler » Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:33 pm

Noticed that the detail on the "Thinking Cap" has faded. Coincidence, or missed art detail?
fehler
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:19 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby Magothys » Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:38 pm

Rob, I would consider rewording panel 10:

"...I didn't find it compelling..."

Is a direct contradiction to Slately's earlier statement on page 43:

"He has made a compelling case."

oslecamo2_temp wrote:Trems meanwhile is all "Pfft, what do I care about their lives, I'll just ask for an inedmization later. Distant money over well-trained troops any day baby!"


I don't see how you would reach that conclusion from Trem's actions. He ordered an evacuation of the atrium when the bombing began. He is convinced that Jetstone will not survive against GK without some form of diplomacy; he needed the GK units in the airspace to survive as a bargaining chip.
Magothys
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:49 am

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby CF_HoneyBadger » Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:49 pm

bladestorm wrote:That's Charlie's MO. Maintain 'neutrality', play other sides against each other, and make a profit from both sides of the conflict.


I agree with bladestorm here, its been stated that Charlie's main goal ins money, money, money. We *just* learned that Parson's goal was to overcome Charlie, albeit everyone and their mother knew about it before Parson did.

I assume that Charlie found out through one of his normal underhanded channels about Parson's "mission" earlier on and has been pulling strings to try and preserve himself / get rid of Parson (in any particular order).
CF_HoneyBadger
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:10 am

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby Ilari » Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:59 pm

I thought Charlie's form in panel 8 was supposed to be Revolver Ocelot, but I guess his clothing is a better match for this Dr. Gero guy.
Ilari
YOTD Supporter!
YOTD Supporter!
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:55 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby bladestorm » Wed Sep 19, 2012 5:12 pm

Magothys wrote:Rob, I would consider rewording panel 10:

"...I didn't find it compelling..."

Is a direct contradiction to Slately's earlier statement on page 43:

"He has made a compelling case."

I took that as Parson had made a compelling case of being a transcendent tactical genius.... and that was before Slately waded into battle and mopped up the Archons, then found out he was a duplicate, then started the process of grieving the loss of himself. He's solidly in the bargaining stage of grieving. Through the course of events since then Slately/Clonely is a direct contradiction of how he was back then. Embittered, spiteful ruler who had his opponent by the balls, to now realizing that he will not see more than one sunset again. Everything about him has changed at this point. I also would not be surprised to learn that Charlie had at least something to do with the current submissiveness of the king.
bladestorm
 
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 10:11 pm

Re: Book 2 – Page 89

Postby sheepfly » Wed Sep 19, 2012 5:58 pm

bladestorm wrote:
Magothys wrote:Rob, I would consider rewording panel 10:

"...I didn't find it compelling..."

Is a direct contradiction to Slately's earlier statement on page 43:

"He has made a compelling case."

I took that as Parson had made a compelling case of being a transcendent tactical genius.... and that was before Slately waded into battle and mopped up the Archons, then found out he was a duplicate, then started the process of grieving the loss of himself. He's solidly in the bargaining stage of grieving. Through the course of events since then Slately/Clonely is a direct contradiction of how he was back then. Embittered, spiteful ruler who had his opponent by the balls, to now realizing that he will not see more than one sunset again. Everything about him has changed at this point.


Agreed. So much has changed since that first discussion of the dossier, particularly Slately's perspective. He could be lying, mistaken, misremembering, or he could have simply changed his mind. The original Slately was certainly no great judge of character or tactical genius himself. We can't presume that the word choice (and the contradiction) was not what the author intended.

bladestorm wrote:I also would not be surprised to learn that Charlie had at least something to do with the current submissiveness of the king.


Yes! The pliability of people receiving thinkagrams from Charlie has come up before, has it not? In book 1, Maggie said she would try to protect Parson's mind.
http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F088.jpg

And Duncan Scone was forced to speculate earlier in Book 2 that Charlie had attempted to plant a suggestion in Jillian's mind via thinkagram.
http://www.erfworld.com/book-2-archive/ ... -09-30.png

The visual transformations of Tramennis and Slately during thinkagrams with Charlie might not be merely nifty art; they might indicate real and pervasive manipulations of their minds to suit Charlie's will.
What would YOU say if you'd won with strength and duty and honor every time when suddenly a veiled flying zero-upkeep 100% recycled army of former friends showed up to croak you with massive numbers and bonuses and skulls with little pink flowers?

Yeah..
User avatar
sheepfly
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:42 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Reactions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Keighvin1 and 2 guests