
One Skunk Todd wrote:
He probably can't use a two-handed weapon and still get his ranged attack. It is a weird looking sword, at least in combination with somebody apparently in full-plate. Looks like a cutlass to me but I doubt he's about to go all piratey on us.Probably the most powerful one-handed-type weapon he can get his hands on.
One Skunk Todd wrote:
I was thinking the same thing. I wonder if the bubble is not necessarily an attack that does damage but rather a snare or tangle of some sort. Most games I've played that have a hidden/veiled/invisible component rule that the cover is broken if you make an attack.
Edited for typos


Hobgobwin wrote:Not really. They have plenty of much higher-level warlords.
Una-royal's ex-chief warlord, for example.

technojunkie wrote:Keep in mind it isn't a veil; but a displacement. All of the actions being taken by the characters are likely being taken by the visible misdirected illusions. That's probably why the other warlord was so quick to realize they we're going after the princes.





hidufel wrote:...looks like a setback coming wandas way.
Perhaps she should pay more attention to Parsons advice?
Menas wrote:Hobgobwin wrote:Not really. They have plenty of much higher-level warlords.
Una-royal's ex-chief warlord, for example.
Where has Parson's level been defined?
And Stanley doesn't know any warlords other than Ansom or Parson. I believe Stanley will go with a known element before an unknown element. Even if he doesn't like him.
Unless he gets croaked by Jillian, in which case his decision won't matter.

theseus2x wrote:Smoker wrote:Also, we dont see ANY displaced units after Jack gets the arrow in the back. I suspect the whole effect is over, not just for those who got hit.
(Wanda got her bubble pop off before the volley.)
No, but the veil covering Ansom was dispelled. To me, that's a strong implication that Jack can't maintain his foolomancy when he gets hurt. Ergo, everyone is now visible and the displaced units vanish. Obviously, this is not conclusive, but I feel its strongly implied.
It is impressive, though, that the Archons and Blue Dwagons can zap the stack and Wanda can even use the bubblegum bubble without breaking the veil. Good on Jack.Smoker wrote:If Ansom gets croaked they'll have no choice but to make Parson Chief Warlord again.
It won't happen, though Jetstone MIGHT take him prisoner. (Or Jack....)

Welf von Ehrwald wrote:Menas wrote:Hobgobwin wrote:Not really. They have plenty of much higher-level warlords.
Una-royal's ex-chief warlord, for example.
Where has Parson's level been defined?
And Stanley doesn't know any warlords other than Ansom or Parson. I believe Stanley will go with a known element before an unknown element. Even if he doesn't like him.
Unless he gets croaked by Jillian, in which case his decision won't matter.
it would be a bad idea to make Parson Chief warlord. He can't leave GK and get to the troops out there. That means he can't give them bonuses. Also he can't lead them into the fight, and thus has to wait for reports to adjust his strategy. It's better to develop a strategy and explain it to a clever warlord at the front who can execute and adjust it on his own. For this he doesn't have to be chief warlord.
Smoker wrote:And @Menas - Parson was called Level 2 in the list of GK forces he received back with his stupid meal aaaages ago in book 1. We cant tell if he's leveled since then, but I suspect not.

Dr Quest DFA wrote:3: What, no friendly fire on Oss and Trem from the mass volley? Boo!
Firkraag wrote:There's one mistake I've been seeing and confuses me a lot; On the second to last panel, Ansom is on the left side of the panel. On the last, he's on the right. Something like this happened in previous comics and it's a little disorienting, especially when you're trying to depict a battle scene... Isn't it best to keep the viewpoint stable?


Smoker wrote:What I was doing, was drawing a parallel between Ansom, who sees his life in a very religious context, and is more or less obsessed (who else would wage war on their own family?), with "some" people in the real world who are also obsessed with their religions. Religions themselves are great. Heck, I'M religious, but there are "people" out there who are crazy about them. If anyone got slammed, it was crazy people, not religions.
Smoker wrote:So, what I was trying to say, was that I have found in my personal experience with "some" people who could be considered as crazy as Ansom is about HIS new religion, is that they generally dont reconsider their religion when something terrible happens. That makes me think that Ansom, like this particular minority of real-world people Im talking about, will not be mad at his Mistress Wanda if things go pear-shaped. I suspect he'll find some other rationale, perhaps considering himself a martyr, or blaming it on Parson, particularly since Wanda made it look like his idea.
Spanners wrote:I assume from the lack of similar comments here that I am the only one having problems making out panel 9, which makes me feel a little stupid - but can someone explain to me what that is behind Jack's dwagon? I gather from comments on here that it is an Archon, but I just can't see it... what is the weird pink thing where the head should be? Looks like a turkey waiting to be cooked... and slightly like an octorok from Legend of Zelda. Help!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests