

Sokrotes wrote:YES!!! Mr. Snipe is still in the game, and my faith is restored in the story! It seems only Wanda is thinking like some of the forum people. Decrypt everything to fix every problem. Hmm can casters cast after being decrypted? lets try it. No sometimes things are better left a mystery. Anyway im going on a slight tangent and i dunno what point im trying to make, basicaly all im saying is YAY JACK IS STILL ALIVE!


BLANDCorporatio wrote:I'm for ranting about how decryption in itself is not evil; in this case, this means saying that whatever good reasons there are to prevent Wanda from decrypting Jack, moral concerns are not among them.


fractal wrote:...
The reason no one else has mentioned it is because you're mistaken. Incapacitated units croak when the turn is ended. Jack must either be healed or decrypted; simply waiting is the same as a decision to decrypt, except that he isn't available to help this turn.

MarbitChow wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote:I'm for ranting about how decryption in itself is not evil; in this case, this means saying that whatever good reasons there are to prevent Wanda from decrypting Jack, moral concerns are not among them.
I agree with you in spirit. Decryption, as a whole, is only morally dubious.
Restoring someone to life is very good. Mind controlling them so that they'd die for you is evil.
Add them both together, and the act itself is very gray.
If Jack were already dead, decryption is the only option, and thus, on the whole, a good thing.
However, killing someone so that they could be decrypted absolutely is evil.
Jjkaybomb wrote:And also, on an earlier topic, I dont think the pragmatism of this automatically makes the act evil. Setting aside the morals of an issue for pragmitism is a cold choice, a gray choice, but definitly not an evil choice.

MarbitChow wrote:Jjkaybomb wrote:And also, on an earlier topic, I dont think the pragmatism of this automatically makes the act evil. Setting aside the morals of an issue for pragmitism is a cold choice, a gray choice, but definitly not an evil choice.
Killing someone because you don't want to 'waste' a healing scroll is evil, especially when he'll be fine next turn if they just keep him out of combat.
If Jack was absolutely required to be able to have any chance at victory, and it HAD to be done this turn, otherwise everybody dies, then yes, I could see the pragmatism of it.
That's not the case here.
Welf von Ehrwald wrote:Could it be, that elves can't be decrypted. If we don't see a Altruist or Lofty elves now, there aren't any.


MarbitChow wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote:I'm for ranting about how decryption in itself is not evil; in this case, this means saying that whatever good reasons there are to prevent Wanda from decrypting Jack, moral concerns are not among them.
I agree with you in spirit. Decryption, as a whole, is only morally dubious.
Restoring someone to life is very good. Mind controlling them so that they'd die for you is evil.
Add them both together, and the act itself is very gray.
If Jack were already dead, decryption is the only option, and thus, on the whole, a good thing.
However, killing someone so that they could be decrypted absolutely is evil.

theseus2x wrote:Intentionally killing them so you can decrypt them just to save a few schmuckers on healing scrolls is not in the "gray" area.


Liam wrote:Wanda poses more to gain by staying with GK
Liam wrote:It’s plausible because:
Wanda didn’t frag Jillian when she had the chance; b/c she loves Jillian
Liam wrote:Wanda is not 100% loyal to GK but to Fate
Liam wrote:Jillian has a Turnamancer – as far as magic works you can’t turn a hamster into a pitbull. Some part of the subject has to want to change.

BLANDCorporatio wrote:robak, lol
theseus2x wrote:Intentionally killing them so you can decrypt them just to save a few schmuckers on healing scrolls is not in the "gray" area.
"Intentionally killing them so that you can decrypt them" is, paradoxically, not killing them. Not murder.
And it's not necessarily just to save a few schmuckers; availability of healing scrolls, coupled with the fact that Wanda is the one unit that's awkward to decrypt, is what makes this morally gray.
Of course, it could be that Jack would get better next turn no matter what, or that GK still has 100 healing scrolls even if they can't buy any others right now, which would paint a different picture ... So argue that Jack doesn't need urgent healing, or that GK still has healomancy to spare. Not that Wanda's evil just because she wants to do surgery on Jack.

theseus2x wrote:Liam wrote:Wanda is not 100% loyal to GK but to Fate
Wanda is 0% loyal to GK. She is 100% temporarily allied with GK because its given her a good support structure. She will drop them (meaning gack Stanley) as soon as they are no longer convenient.
theseus2x wrote:Dunno about that. Killing someone so you can decrypt them? Parson put it better than I....
theseus2x wrote:And okay, the supply of healing scrolls is finite. How many units are honestly critical to GK's success? They aren't saving the scrolls for the Decrypted Marbits, people.


eqdok2007 wrote:fractal wrote:...
The reason no one else has mentioned it is because you're mistaken. Incapacitated units croak when the turn is ended. Jack must either be healed or decrypted; simply waiting is the same as a decision to decrypt, except that he isn't available to help this turn.
No I don't think so.
Vinnie was incapacitated here with an arrow in the chest and all booped up in this update.
http://www.erfworld.com/page/17/
He got COMPLETELY better the next day... well until he got news that Transylvito was popping a new heir.

SteveMB wrote:Welf von Ehrwald wrote:Could it be, that elves can't be decrypted. If we don't see a Altruist or Lofty elves now, there aren't any.
Or it could be that their position got a particularly heavy hit from the eruption, leaving them too badly roasted (like Bogroll).

Users browsing this forum: Lipkin, LiquidBlue, Nygma, slashingweapon, Squall83, Thnikkamancer and 27 guests