Gez wrote:I highly doubt it. And any unit that's popped up fully-formed and with its equipment cannot be considered an Earthworlder anyway.


asparagus wrote:Gez wrote:I highly doubt it. And any unit that's popped up fully-formed and with its equipment cannot be considered an Earthworlder anyway.
May be it would be a "fully formed baby" with a "growth special". Stanley would be really disappointed. If it had a "cute" special it might be a sort of hippiemancer secret weapon.
asparagus wrote:Gez wrote:I highly doubt it. And any unit that's popped up fully-formed and with its equipment cannot be considered an Earthworlder anyway.
May be it would be a "fully formed baby" with a "growth special". Stanley would be really disappointed. If it had a "cute" special it might be a sort of hippiemancer secret weapon.
Gez wrote:... Erfworld doesn't work this way. Parson isn't a natural ally...
multilis wrote:Gez wrote:... Erfworld doesn't work this way. Parson isn't a natural ally...
How do we know that?
Sixty wrote:Like someone mentioned earlier, if the special mission that Stanley was on when the gobwins and hobgobwins turned was to attack FAQ then at that point he was Chief Warlord (http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F079.jpg) and possibly the Heir Designate. If Wanda did engineer it then she might have gone into it thinking that she was gonna cause Stanley to disband. That depends on her not knowing Stanley was the heir which we don't know.
Sokrotes wrote:They no longer make men, yet Stanley is from the Plaid tribe of men. My question is, why did Stanley stop making men?
multilis wrote: (Every turn his upkeep is paid just like a natural ally,




fractal wrote:For the debate on timing (i.e. when the Gobwins turned on Saline IV and made Stanley ruler), this comic seems relevant:
http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F079.jpg
The green dwagon rider in panel seven looks a lot like Wanda.
The subsequent comic, http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F079a.jpg is also interesting. It says that natural allies have their own treasuries: an inconsistency? Parson gets his information from Sizemore, who could be wrong, although Vurp says that Warlords, at least, "should know" that "Tribes have no purse and keep no Schmuckers."

noxharrington wrote:
But, moreover, this is a DEEPLY crappy situation for Tribes. If they find a gem, they must spend all of the shmuckers it yields immediately. So, if they find a gem that's worth enough to keep them fed for twenty turns, they would need to pop enough food for their current population and however many other units they could afford - and then have nothing with which to feed those units on the next turn. They would need to find a gem every turn - and, preferrably, not one that was too valuable, or they'd end up with an unsustainable population.
fractal wrote:For the debate on timing (i.e. when the Gobwins turned on Saline IV and made Stanley ruler), this comic seems relevant:
http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F079.jpg
The green dwagon rider in panel seven looks a lot like Wanda.
The subsequent comic, http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F079a.jpg is also interesting. It says that natural allies have their own treasuries: an inconsistency? Parson gets his information from Sizemore, who could be wrong, although Vurp says that Warlords, at least, "should know" that "Tribes have no purse and keep no Schmuckers."
GobwinPie wrote:Interesting update.
1) What is Vurp feeling bad about at first? Lying to Parson or what his side did?

crazyguy_co wrote:We already know you can have more rations than just 1 turns worth, Jillian mentioned during the summer updates having enough for x turns, but deciding to hunt for food while she could to preserve her rations.
Following that logic, natural allies could choose to use the money to produce extra food. The rations have to be popped next turn, doesn't say it has to be consumed... Also, they can pop equipment.
Users browsing this forum: Denar, Google [Bot] and 6 guests