Controversial Topic

Your new games, homebrews, mods and ideas. Forum games go here.

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby DevilDan » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:36 am

Asinine QFT post intended to represent an actual point but adding nothing.
They could not possibly win. Every man knew this with certainty, and lo it was glorious.
User avatar
DevilDan
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:44 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby carisbourg » Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:08 am

DevilDan wrote:Asinine QFT ... point ... adding nothing.


Disagreement with quote taken out of context

:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: Question about TLA with too many smilies followed by a winky to imply that no insult is intended ;)
carisbourg
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Lady Nerevar » Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:57 am

general flame about how this thread is making the community look bad and scaring away potential members. faux moderator attitude throughout.
User avatar
Lady Nerevar
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:51 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby KiltedNinja » Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:59 am

Random reply to above poster, not adding anything usefull to the conversation, and just commenting on their nick and how it's a nice modification of Morrowind lore.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
...I'm still holding out for the Arkenoid...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
KiltedNinja
YOTD Supporter!
YOTD Supporter!
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:16 am
Location: Scotland, UK (The other other Magic Kingdom)

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby artoni » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:59 pm

Declaration that one has failed to succeed at the event.
User avatar
artoni
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:39 pm

Advertisement for male enhancement from a bot as links in a generic comment.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby carisbourg » Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:15 pm

Whiny complaint to moderater for not doing something about bots

Agree about wadering off topic, attempt to get back on topic by

1.Listing
2.Every
3.Idea
4.That
5.Has
6.Been
7.Put
8.Forth
9.Including
10.The
11.Really
12.Stupid
13.Ones

Express admiration for idea 3, but acknowledge that idea 12 has possibilities.
carisbourg
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby JenBurdoo » Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:35 am

Suggest that bloated, tangent-filled topic be closed and that a new one be started.
JenBurdoo
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 7:50 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby BarraSadei » Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:03 pm

Counters whether topic should be closed, and proceeds to take every point I find logical and dissect them, all while providing a counter to offer a chance for an opposing view. Random tangent rant. Tangent explaining medical condition that I claim to have on why I went on a tangent rant to begin with. Back to topic at hand. I offer my own opinion; any progress I make is immediately shot down by myself, fearing first post will be too controversial. Offers what I think to be a unique view, but is really a hodge-podge of what everyone said. Rambling. Apology for rambling. Gratuitious use of semi-colons; fancy vocabulary. Rant about tangent that I eventually (likely poorly) link to the topic. End with absolutely no ground made in either direction.

Random tangent to end, apologizing on how this is my first post.

-Signature-
BarraSadei
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby depricated » Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:22 pm

Generic welcome post in response to last post, disregarding content entirely.
Image
User avatar
depricated
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 2:48 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Wollem » Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:15 am

BarraSadei wrote:Gratuitious use of semi-colons; fancy vocabulary. Rant about tangent that I eventually (likely poorly) link to the topic.


Fanboyish praise of semicolons fed more by their comparatively rare usage and perceived elitism than by genuine functionalities, throughout which is employed moral high ground from this being the poster's second rather than first post.
Wollem
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:23 am

Blind arrogant rage at the audacity of some people to argue logically. Completely misinformed, but passionate argument proving to be in line with Benford's law of controversy.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Raigne » Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:18 pm

Wollem wrote:
BarraSadei wrote:Gratuitious use of semi-colons; fancy vocabulary. Rant about tangent that I eventually (likely poorly) link to the topic.


Fanboyish praise of semicolons fed more by their comparatively rare usage and perceived elitism than by genuine functionalities, throughout which is employed moral high ground from this being the poster's second rather than first post.


Rant about semicolon usage outside of delineation. Criticism of first quoted poster for failing to use semicolon appropriately. Criticism of second poster for praising aforementioned misuse. Instructions on proper use of semicolon followed by disclaimer that reiterates first sentence of reply.

Half-assed attempt to make post not be completely off topic.
I Am A: Neutral Good Human Ranger/Wizard (2nd/1st Level)
Str-10 Dex-12 Con-11 Int-16 Wis-15 Cha-13

>It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
User avatar
Raigne
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:53 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Lady Nerevar » Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:19 pm

link to site explaining how to use the semicolon, strong implication that the previous users were all wrong.
User avatar
Lady Nerevar
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:51 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:29 pm

Lady Nerevar wrote:link to site explaining how to use the semicolon, strong implication that the previous users were all wrong.


Gratitous; and incorrect; use of; the semi-colon; in an; attempt to; anger; the; grammar; nazis.
;
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Lady Nerevar » Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:49 pm

MarbitChow wrote:
Lady Nerevar wrote:link to site explaining how to use the semicolon, strong implication that the previous users were all wrong.


Gratitous; and incorrect; use of; the semi-colon; in an; attempt to; anger; the; grammar; nazis.
;

angry post saying that the previous poster's attempts at trolling are futile (despite their obviously having worked).
User avatar
Lady Nerevar
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:51 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:26 am

A concise, on-topic post trying to wrangle the thread back from all of the tangents.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby depricated » Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:10 am

snarkyPost
{
Snark snark = new Snark(demonstration(semicolon));
}
Image
User avatar
depricated
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 2:48 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Rizban » Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:30 pm

Meaningless post which reveals the author found the thread to be too long and not worth reading. Immediately following comments are noncommittal as to whether or not the author agrees or disagrees with the first few posts yet still felt his opinion was worth posting while adding nothing of significance to the thread.
User avatar
Rizban
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:27 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:44 pm

Flame post
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Apologies for flame post.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Your Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0100010, deflip007 and 2 guests