Controversial Topic

Your new games, homebrews, mods and ideas. Forum games go here.

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Itzal » Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:41 am

Almost verbatum repeat of a prior posters post showing that the current poster couldn't be bothered to read the topic history
Veni Vedi Volo En Domium Redare
I came, I saw, I wanna go home.
User avatar
Itzal
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:26 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Sethram » Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:41 am

A post full of ad hominem, strawmen, and pretty much every other logical fallacy one can make.
User avatar
Sethram
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 9:05 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Infidel » Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:08 am

Kreistor wrote:Obvious gloat that people seem to be enjoying the thread topic.


abbreviation that does nothing to add what was said before, just an indication of agreement. Maybe implying that my opinion might be of even greater worth than the poster quoted, or maybe an indication that I believe that factual correctness is determined democratically, or maybe just an indication of agreement.
Who is that beautiful red-headed devil,
Stabs you in the heart so that she can level?
It's Scarlet!
- BC
User avatar
Infidel
I am a Tool!
I am a Tool!
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:22 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:46 am

Sethram wrote:A post full of ad hominem, strawmen, and pretty much every other logical fallacy one can make.

Accusation that poster's ideas are equivalent to those of the dominant political party in German duing the 1930s and 1940s.
Equilateratoria is now underway. New players are welcome to join at any time! (Rules)
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2509
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Cmdr I. Heartly Noah » Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:37 am

Infidel wrote:
Kreistor wrote:Obvious gloat that people seem to be enjoying the thread topic.


abbreviation that does nothing to add what was said before, just an indication of agreement. Maybe implying that my opinion might be of even greater worth than the poster quoted, or maybe an indication that I believe that factual correctness is determined democratically, or maybe just an indication of agreement.


Single-word, four-letter post that indicates complete agreement with the post above, while literally adding nothing to the conversation but "this."
I am a: Chaotic Neutral Human Bard/Sorcerer (2nd/1st Level)
Str- 12, Dex- 15, Con- 12, Int- 14, Wis- 11, Cha- 13
Cmdr I. Heartly Noah
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:24 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby malekith » Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:51 pm

MarbitChow wrote:
malekith wrote:Ending remark obviously showing the author's attempt to read the whole topic and prove themselves clever about the topic but being apologetic if they've offended anyone - basically opening them up for an attack from following posters

Immediate and vehement attack on poster.

Shocked outburst with a counter attack followed by a concious effort to back-peddel through his earlier post to appease quoted poster and yet still trying to portray a unique standpoint on the issue. And fails to deliver due to attempting to hide the obvious time gap between posts.

Kreistor wrote:Obvious gloat that people seem to be enjoying the thread topic.

uneccesary second quoting to agree wholeheartedly and yet attack previous posters for derailing the thread with pointless spamming of agreement posts.
Obvious remark that this is only a quick post as part of author's fairly regular trips to the forums.

Mal
malekith
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:45 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Infidel » Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:00 pm

malekith wrote:
Kreistor wrote:Obvious gloat that people seem to be enjoying the thread topic.

uneccesary second quoting to agree wholeheartedly and yet attack previous posters for derailing the thread with pointless spamming of agreement posts.


A modding attempt that accuses the previous poster of playing mod. A warning that the previous poster will be reported if such behavior does not discontinue.

Statement that my own behavior is above reproach.

MarbitChow wrote:
Sethram wrote:A post full of ad hominem, strawmen, and pretty much every other logical fallacy one can make.

Accusation that poster's ideas are equivalent to those of the dominant political party in German duing the 1930s and 1940s.


Obligatory post identifying the meme the quoted post invokes.
Who is that beautiful red-headed devil,
Stabs you in the heart so that she can level?
It's Scarlet!
- BC
User avatar
Infidel
I am a Tool!
I am a Tool!
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:22 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Mal » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:29 am

Comparison of the original poster and all who agree with him to Hitler once more.

Possible comparison to terrorist group popular with the media at whatever current time.
Mal, Professional Patsy! You can blame it alllll on me :D
User avatar
Mal
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:38 pm
Location: The MalCave

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Itzal » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:20 am

Grudging admission to being a time travelling Hitler who used his time machine to escape to the future leaving a body double to take the blame.

((Hah bet you weren't expecting that were you :P ))

((Of course I'm not... but I'm sure you never believed me in the first place :roll: ))
Veni Vedi Volo En Domium Redare
I came, I saw, I wanna go home.
User avatar
Itzal
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:26 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby malekith » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:48 am

Itzal wrote:Grudging admission to being a time travelling Hitler who used his time machine to escape to the future leaving a body double to take the blame.

((Hah bet you weren't expecting that were you :P ))

((Of course I'm not... but I'm sure you never believed me in the first place :roll: ))

absolute attack on the previous poster for posting such an idiotic idea and insults their intelligence and sense of humour by pointing out that they have not grasped the concepts being disscussed in this thread or the manner in which they are represented.

Mal
malekith
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:45 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Skyrar » Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:57 pm

Slightly surprised post, here is honest disbelief in the fact that this topic is still alive.
True Neutral Human Barbarian/Bard (2nd/1st Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength- 12
Dexterity- 11
Constitution- 10
Intelligence- 15
Wisdom- 14
Charisma- 13
Skyrar
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Cmdr I. Heartly Noah » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:56 pm

Post claiming to be the final post in the thread.
I am a: Chaotic Neutral Human Bard/Sorcerer (2nd/1st Level)
Str- 12, Dex- 15, Con- 12, Int- 14, Wis- 11, Cha- 13
Cmdr I. Heartly Noah
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:24 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Infidel » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:43 pm

Skyrar wrote:Slightly surprised post, here is honest disbelief in the fact that this topic is still alive.


Post claiming surprise that this thread is not many pages longer.
Who is that beautiful red-headed devil,
Stabs you in the heart so that she can level?
It's Scarlet!
- BC
User avatar
Infidel
I am a Tool!
I am a Tool!
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:22 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby malekith » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:35 pm

post obviously just trying to increase the length of the thread and post count of author.
vauge collection of the thoughts put forward in the thread on the topic but lacking any conclusion and opening it up for furthur discussion from any new visitors.

Mal
malekith
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:45 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Housellama » Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:02 pm

Actual informed response to the original topic, several weeks too late.
"All warfare is based on deception" - Sun Tzu, Chapter 1, Line 18, The Art of War

"The principle of strategy is to know ten thousand things by having one thing." - Miyamoto Musashi, The Book of Earth, Go Rin No Sho
User avatar
Housellama
Tool + YOTD Supporter!
Tool + YOTD Supporter!
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Itzal » Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:18 pm

attack on last posters response using fauly logic to dispute posters claims
Veni Vedi Volo En Domium Redare
I came, I saw, I wanna go home.
User avatar
Itzal
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:26 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Doktor Jones » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:33 pm

malekith wrote:post obviously just trying to increase the length of the thread and post count of author.
vauge collection of the thoughts put forward in the thread on the topic but lacking any conclusion and opening it up for furthur discussion from any new visitors.

Mal


enthusiastic agreement. listing of many points of evidence in support of these ideas that appear well-thought-out at first, but are at best dubious under any scrutiny.
User avatar
Doktor Jones
Erfabet Supporter!
Erfabet Supporter!
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Cmdr I. Heartly Noah » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:56 pm

Repeated attempt at being the final poster to add to the thread.
I am a: Chaotic Neutral Human Bard/Sorcerer (2nd/1st Level)
Str- 12, Dex- 15, Con- 12, Int- 14, Wis- 11, Cha- 13
Cmdr I. Heartly Noah
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:24 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Infidel » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:07 pm

Housellama wrote:Actual informed response to the original topic, several weeks too late.


A note that this thread is yet to live several weeks, so it is difficult to be several weeks too late. Then a discussion of which comes first, cause or effect.
Who is that beautiful red-headed devil,
Stabs you in the heart so that she can level?
It's Scarlet!
- BC
User avatar
Infidel
I am a Tool!
I am a Tool!
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:22 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby jtaylor » Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:09 am

Cmdr I. Heartly Noah wrote:Statement of intent to leave and never return.

Request for transfer of ownership of your soon to be unused goods.
jtaylor
Erfabet + Pins Supporter!
Erfabet + Pins Supporter!
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:27 am

PreviousNext

Return to Your Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests