Controversial Topic

Your new games, homebrews, mods and ideas. Forum games go here.

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Cmdr I. Heartly Noah » Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:51 pm

Thinly veiled attempt to impersonate a mod closing the thread.
I am a: Chaotic Neutral Human Bard/Sorcerer (2nd/1st Level)
Str- 12, Dex- 15, Con- 12, Int- 14, Wis- 11, Cha- 13
Cmdr I. Heartly Noah
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:24 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby jtaylor » Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:29 am

Notification that the actual mod being impersonated has been notified, followed by glee at getting an opportunity to see the fabled artifact known as the banhammer descend to smite my enemies.
jtaylor
Erfabet + Pins Supporter!
Erfabet + Pins Supporter!
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:27 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby depricated » Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:31 am

taunting post at person likely to be banned
Image
User avatar
depricated
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 2:48 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Cmdr I. Heartly Noah » Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:02 am

Complaint via alt account that poster was only trying to do what real mods should have done long ago; devolves into long diatribe about useless, power-hungry, biased, absentee, overzealous, unfair, inactive modding.
I am a: Chaotic Neutral Human Bard/Sorcerer (2nd/1st Level)
Str- 12, Dex- 15, Con- 12, Int- 14, Wis- 11, Cha- 13
Cmdr I. Heartly Noah
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:24 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby jioan » Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:49 am

A link to an entire website based on the controversial topic and the poster suggests to continue this discussion over there.
User avatar
jioan
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MuthSera » Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:47 am

jioan wrote:A link to an entire website based on the controversial topic and the poster suggests to continue this discussion over there.

immediate flame. Discussion of poor modding and/or the website owner being unfair.
Image
oh god how did this get here
I am not good with computer
User avatar
MuthSera
 
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:02 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby depricated » Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:59 pm

MuthSera wrote:
jioan wrote:A link to an entire website based on the controversial topic and the poster suggests to continue this discussion over there.

immediate flame. Discussion of poor modding and/or the website owner being unfair.

quoted for meme
Image
User avatar
depricated
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 2:48 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Prometheus » Wed Jul 29, 2009 2:42 am

Exasperated request that other posters stop trying to relocate topic, tinged with hints of self-righteousness.
The first step to being right all of the time is to admit that you're wrong most of the time.
User avatar
Prometheus
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Unclever title » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am

Original Poster wrote:Quote of some of the original poster's original post to bring to light the section desired to comment on.

Surprisingly intelligent and well thought out post with a link to new evidence that sheds light on the topic of the original post suggesting a conclusive conclusion to a controversial topic not even remotely related to the topic of the original post.
Unclever title
Erfabet Supporter!
Erfabet Supporter!
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:42 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby depricated » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:26 pm

Flaming about thread croakamancy and logical fallacies.
Image
User avatar
depricated
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 2:48 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Prometheus » Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:07 pm

depricated wrote:Flaming about thread croakamancy and logical fallacies.

Post that solely exists to illustrate poster's ranks in "Raise Thread".
The first step to being right all of the time is to admit that you're wrong most of the time.
User avatar
Prometheus
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby KiltedNinja » Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:26 am

Blatant attempt at thread resurrection :D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
...I'm still holding out for the Arkenoid...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
KiltedNinja
YOTD Supporter!
YOTD Supporter!
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:16 am
Location: Scotland, UK (The other other Magic Kingdom)

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Doktor Jones » Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:52 pm

mockery, derision, and ranting about thread necromancy
User avatar
Doktor Jones
Erfabet Supporter!
Erfabet Supporter!
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:38 pm

Holier-than-thou attitude by an occasional poster. Reference to something in an obscure panel taken out of context.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby carisbourg » Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:25 am

Question about whether topic on page 2 has been discussed yet. Eager, but. Disjointed follow up on previous point.


__________________

humorous (but frequently seen) .sig
Last edited by carisbourg on Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
carisbourg
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:07 pm

Condescending post explaining that the original posters have already covered this in detail.
Intelligence of later posters called into question for failing to understand the obvious superiority of the original arguments, even though original arguments don't have any bearing on the current issues being discussed.
Equilateratoria is now underway. New players are welcome to join at any time! (Rules)
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2509
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Raigne » Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:48 pm

Complete quote of first post, followed by single line asserting that this commenter has no opinion either way on the topic. Abuse of the "lol" acronym.
I Am A: Neutral Good Human Ranger/Wizard (2nd/1st Level)
Str-10 Dex-12 Con-11 Int-16 Wis-15 Cha-13

>It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
User avatar
Raigne
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:53 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby carisbourg » Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:44 pm

MarbitChow wrote:Condescending post explaining that the original posters have already covered this in detail.
Intelligence of later posters called into question for failing to understand the obvious superiority of the original arguments, even though original arguments don't have any bearing on the current issues being discussed.


Justification of previous post using suspiciously more eloquent grammar. Acknowledgement of possibility that poster was lax in not reading topic thouroughly, but indignant denaial of said laxity being an indication of lack of intelligence. :oops: (multiple mispellings)

Inquiry regarding bearing of original argument. ;)
______________
humorous (but frequently seen) .sig
carisbourg
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby lamguin » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:14 am

Extremely late arrival to the topic, posted without reading past the first page.

Condescending correction of spelling and/or grammar of a previous post without adding any discussion of the actual topic.
Avatar: Bogroll as Parson by Jami Noguchi and Rob Baldur. Avatarized by SteveMB.
User avatar
lamguin
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 1:32 am
Location: Joplin, Missouri

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby lamguin » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:14 am

Accidental double post.

Edit: Edited in apology for double posting.
Avatar: Bogroll as Parson by Jami Noguchi and Rob Baldur. Avatarized by SteveMB.
User avatar
lamguin
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 1:32 am
Location: Joplin, Missouri

PreviousNext

Return to Your Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest