Controversial Topic

Your new games, homebrews, mods and ideas. Forum games go here.

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby carisbourg » Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:24 am

Gratuitious insults about double posting in response to condescending comments about spelling. Suggestion that prevoius poster should learn read sticky on site guidelines.

_______________________________________
Humourus (but frequently seen) .sig
carisbourg
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby ObadiahtheSlim » Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:32 am

Angry rant at first post that clearly ignores everything posted in the last 5 pages. Insinuates original poster has an affinity for barnyard animals.
ObadiahtheSlim
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:58 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby DevilDan » Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:30 pm

Wall of text riddled with inaccuracies and typos, read by no one, and ignored by any future posters.
They could not possibly win. Every man knew this with certainty, and lo it was glorious.
User avatar
DevilDan
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:44 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:33 pm

Monty Python quote for no apparent reason.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby PhoenixTalion » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:08 pm

Ichthus wrote:Monty Python quote for no apparent reason.


Acidic comment regarding this quote's lack of relevance. Link to pertinent XKCD strip.
|Icons|Art|Fanfic|

"The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility. And vice versa."
~Robert Heinlein
User avatar
PhoenixTalion
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:37 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby President_Allosaurus » Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:55 pm

Clearly underthought post to appear as if through contributing while really just showing off new avatar or tag.
User avatar
President_Allosaurus
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:40 pm

President_Allosaurus wrote:Clearly underthought post to appear as if through contributing while really just showing off new avatar or tag.


Tangent about new avatar or tag and request for information pertaining to where you got it.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Yosarian » Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:28 pm

Kreistor wrote:Long, rambling, and almost-but-not-quite interesting post about an oddly confusing possible game rule. Clearly provocative in a general manner, such that it will prompt response from someone non-specific, while seeming to be directly attacking particular individuals.



Response to the original post. Statement that I do not have enough time to read entire thread, snide disparagement of other posters who do, vague accusation that they must not have lives. Assertion that my response is nonetheless original and insightful, despite the fact that every point I brought up has already been brought up by someone else.
Yosarian
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Yosarian » Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:29 pm

Unnecessary double post, containing responses that reveal that I have, in fact, read entire thread.
Yosarian
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:10 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Crovius » Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:51 pm

Detailed post that nit picks at grammatical errors posted throughout thread, indicating poster did infact read through at least most if not all of the thread, while ignoring anything that has to do with the origional topic or any tangents that were subsequently invented.

Also notes on the intelligence of the huamn race as a whole being subpar at best and that the lak of intelligence expressed in this thread is unsurprising. Further goes to compare many most trolls to the pre-adulecents that plague his image forum of questionable taste, even though poster only goes to a handful of the mentioned site's subgroups do to a lack of real social life and no true self confidence.

Ends with an insult to all other posters' paternal figures.
Crovius
 
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:51 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby carisbourg » Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:03 pm

Crovius wrote:point 1

Snotty comment.
Crovius wrote:point 2

Oblivious comment.
Crovius wrote:point 3

Irrelevant comment.

Suggestion that maybe a new thread is in order. Said thread topic would not cover these three points.
carisbourg
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:14 pm

carisbourg wrote:
Crovius wrote:point 1

Snotty comment.
Crovius wrote:point 2

Oblivious comment.
Crovius wrote:point 3

Irrelevant comment.

Suggestion that maybe a new thread is in order. Said thread topic would not cover these three points.


Quoting the entire very very long previous post to simply assert my agreement with the points made.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Doktor Jones » Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:22 am

Image of Down syndrome person participating in athletic events, with snarky, crude, and rather offensive caption regarding internet arguments; despite previous participation in these arguments.
User avatar
Doktor Jones
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:29 am

Accidental post, replying to a topic in an entirely different thread.
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby JenBurdoo » Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:03 pm

Invocation of Godwin's Law.
JenBurdoo
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 7:50 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:51 am

Performs the winning move of Mornington Crescent.
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby carisbourg » Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:47 pm

Asks everyone if they play "The Game" :twisted:
carisbourg
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby flatlander37 » Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:08 pm

Excited first post by a newbie who has hoped to show their instant understanding and coolness by posting.
Ending remark obviously showing the author's attempt to read the whole topic and prove themselves clever about the topic but being apologetic if they've offended anyone - basically opening them up for an attack from following posters

And then taking advice of previous cool, sorry kewl posts, and asking a very related question about something that should have been read in the FAQ
flatlander37
I am a Tool!
I am a Tool!
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:00 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Ichthus » Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:47 pm

--- this post has been removed by the moderator ---
Ichthus
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby KiltedNinja » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:15 am

Apparently nonsensical retort to the above poster, which isn't understood due to said poster's post being removed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
...I'm still holding out for the Arkenoid...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
KiltedNinja
YOTD Supporter!
YOTD Supporter!
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:16 am
Location: Scotland, UK (The other other Magic Kingdom)

PreviousNext

Return to Your Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0100010 and 1 guest