
The Old Hack wrote:And that Faq Predictamancer... is beginning to irritate me. The Faq predictamancer foretold the fall of the Kingdom, well and good. The Faq predictamancer also told Wanda that she would one day possess an Arkentool... directly causing Wanda to enter the bargain that would cause the fall of the Kingdom. Self-fulfilling prophecies, anyone? Did the Predictamancer tell Banhammer of the coming fall because she/he knew it would make Banhammer order an heir popped, for that matter? Whoever that Predictamancer is, I smell manipulation like a forest fire...

Ofc, it seems like a pretty hard feature to code into a game. Imagine in a MMORPG that a NPC said "you are fated to obtain the sword of uberness". How would the programmers actually code it.


konmanrocks wrote:all this speculation about jack. isnt it simply possible that when they took the city, that one of the casters did one of the thinkamancy spells to change his loyalty to make him come along. it could be he was simply captured, and brought back to GW and maggie switched his loyalty.
Infidel wrote:
Ofc, it seems like a pretty hard feature to code into a game. Imagine in a MMORPG that a NPC said "you are fated to obtain the sword of uberness". How would the programmers actually code it.
I can see someone playing a game. They make a mistake and die, so as they fall down to the ground, the sword of uberness falls right next to his hand. The player reaches to grab the sword, and dies as he touches it.



SteveMB wrote:Whispri wrote:According to Jillian mercenary work was only carried out when there was no other way of boosting the treasury, which really does make the window for happenstance sound rather small.
We have no idea how often Faq needed extra funds. Also, each mission would be prolonged by the need to travel to and from a "far-off" side. Additionally, we can be sure that Jillian bent each and every judgment-call situation in the direction of being away from home longer and more often.
Given all that, Faq's only real military force might have been away for a fairly high percentage of turns.
kreszantas wrote:Wanda missing a few details should not really matter this makes for cracks in both stories and allows for futher exposition later, if it is all solved now than there will be a less dramatic confrontation later.
The Old Hack wrote:SteveMB wrote:Whispri wrote:According to Jillian mercenary work was only carried out when there was no other way of boosting the treasury, which really does make the window for happenstance sound rather small.
We have no idea how often Faq needed extra funds. Also, each mission would be prolonged by the need to travel to and from a "far-off" side. Additionally, we can be sure that Jillian bent each and every judgment-call situation in the direction of being away from home longer and more often.
Given all that, Faq's only real military force might have been away for a fairly high percentage of turns.
This also assumes that it was happenstance. I rather doubt that it was; rather, it was Fate.


Infidel wrote:Ofc, it seems like a pretty hard feature to code into a game. Imagine in a MMORPG that a NPC said "you are fated to obtain the sword of uberness". How would the programmers actually code it.
I can see someone playing a game. They make a mistake and die, so as they fall down to the ground, the sword of uberness falls right next to his hand. The player reaches to grab the sword, and dies as he touches it.

raphfrk wrote:Ofc, that isn't entirely possible in RL.


Because she didn't really care. Her belief that her capital would win satisfied the technical requirements of loyalty, but that doesn't mean that she actually had to want her side to win, or care what happened either way.Whispri wrote:Yeah so, why would Wanda arrange this at a time when Jillian was away with her Gwiffons and the defences of the Capital weaker than normal?


Infidel wrote:So with the spiderman masks in the background, is predictamancy related to spider sense maybe?




Thydron wrote:It could also be that Wanda simply didn't know that Stanley would be bringing a ton of dwagons with him & assumed that because she had been Fated to get a Arkentool that Stanley was Fated to die in the attack?




Thydron wrote:Yeah, something like that. Either way, she clearly states that she "imagined that he would lose, and his artifact would fall [to her]" - whether that's because she underestimated Stanley, overestimated Faq's troops, whatever- it shows pretty clearly that she didn't expect him to win & probably didn't consider contacting him to be betraying Faq.



Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests