splintermute wrote:I think it's entirely possible that Spacerock will pull some surprise out of a hat - they seem to have a magic user specifically designed for that purpose.
Haha. Awesome.
splintermute wrote:I think it's entirely possible that Spacerock will pull some surprise out of a hat - they seem to have a magic user specifically designed for that purpose.


atteSmythe wrote:RukhHammerwing wrote:edit: And who is the sad, lonely little warlord in the last panel with no dwagon to ride? That has to be a blow to his loyalty score...
Wrigley. They took his spear and didn't even give him a dragon. Meanies!
RukhHammerwing wrote:atteSmythe wrote:RukhHammerwing wrote:edit: And who is the sad, lonely little warlord in the last panel with no dwagon to ride? That has to be a blow to his loyalty score...
Wrigley. They took his spear and didn't even give him a dragon. Meanies!
...and if you look, he still does not have his spear. What is GK doing?

Infidel wrote:Unfortunately, any coerced information is not nearly as valid as physical verification. Even if the decwypted person freely divulges everything he knows, it doesn't allow for any intel that is not known. Only physically scouting the space will suffice. So no matter if she apprehends Ossomer himself, she is still leaving herself vulnerable to surprise.
Raza wrote:Decrypting a unit is making a forceful grab at information about what Jetstone's got going on. Scouting hexes is doing the same. Both have advantages, both have flaws; it's the difference between listening at a door or peeking through the keyhole. The point is that you're doing what you can (and in that light, it might be wise to scout as well as decrypt), not that it is structurally foolish to act without having attained a specific arbitrary level of intelligence..


Infidel wrote:Raza wrote:Decrypting a unit is making a forceful grab at information about what Jetstone's got going on. Scouting hexes is doing the same. Both have advantages, both have flaws; it's the difference between listening at a door or peeking through the keyhole. The point is that you're doing what you can (and in that light, it might be wise to scout as well as decrypt), not that it is structurally foolish to act without having attained a specific arbitrary level of intelligence..
On the contrary, the effects of Decryption on units is now fully realized by all known forces. And one of the most basic ways to combat the intelligence exposure is to encapsulate information--and even deliberately misinform one's own troops. Since we have every indication that the coalition forces are led by intelligent individuals, there is no reason to assume they have not accounted for this in all of their planning.
While scouts can still be fooled, archons can pierce veils, so yes, using a specific method of intelligence gathering is hardly arbitrary. You don't just want some arbitrary intelligence, you want the BEST intelligence that you can get, even at the expense of lost units. The more critical the mission, the more critical ALL expedient means for gathering intelligence are explored.
The point is, if something is veiled or otherwise hidden, there is still at least a chance of discovering it, and there are different actions that can be done to improve those chances. But if someone doesn't know something, then no matter what the means used for the interrogation, there is no chance of getting that information from them. Interrogation is a high risk method that should be compensated with another method that minimizes the risk.
Menas wrote:If she gets Ossomer he's certainly going to be aware of all of Jetstone's battle plans and resources. And all decrypted units will do everything they can to give Wanda exactly what she asks for.
I'm not saying this is what's going to happen, but something about the way Wanda appeared to be looking towards Ossomer when she made her last statement made me think she's got an idea on how to pull this off.


Justyn wrote: Why would they take low level infantry to attack the capital? Wrigley is probably still in Warchalking doing exactly what Queen Bea had him doing, except now he's doing it for Stanley the Tool and his Mistress Wanda.
HailGreen28 wrote:
3. Maybe Ansom should scout the same way he did at the sub-battle of the Dwagon Donut. Send an expendable unit into a hex first, to see what's there.

yay wrote:someone already said this, but Spacerock is probably full of allies (including casters). its similar to ansom sending only Jetstone and marbits into the tunnels instead of risking allies...


Infidel wrote:I disagree with that assessment rather strongly. You quoted where I mentioned encapsulation and misinformation, so I don't see how you can make such a statement as an argument against my point, without even addressing it.
Text said that the Jetstone faction leader always allowed his warlords to do what they wanted. But that was in the past before decryption and it's current effects. Now that the rules have changed, only a total idiot would continue to operate as if the rules were the same.
I added this point after you quoted me, but I'll repeat it again. Only bad strategy depends on the enemy's stupidity. My impression, on the other hand, is that every royal seen so far has been quite intelligent, and flexible, even if that royal prefers the bigger hammer approach. So I'd expect to see a creative response to the decryption issue very soon from the coalition.

ftl wrote:Having your chief warlord not know his own plan is a far greater stupidity than taking the risk that "yes, if they capture the chief warlord, they can find out all his plans."
The screenwriters of 'The Professional' wrote:Norman Stansfield: Bring me everyone.
Benny: What do you mean "everyone"?
Norman Stansfield: EVERYONE.


Good points. Archons would probably work. Maybe you could use a warlord riding a Dwagon for that. Dunno which would be more expensive or efficient. Maybe Maggie could handle relaying info real-time from the Archon or warlord...... to an Archon or Ansom/Wanda directly.ftl wrote:HailGreen28 wrote:
3. Maybe Ansom should scout the same way he did at the sub-battle of the Dwagon Donut. Send an expendable unit into a hex first, to see what's there.
It's not that easy - remember, bats have a special that lets them scout automatically. Most units would need to return to relay the information - which would be tricky because unled units auto-engage, so you have to send units with leadership if you want it to be possible to scout out the location of a large enemy force. It would have to be archons - an unled Dwagon would automatically engage the enemy, probably die if it finds anything interesting (interesting is pretty much defined as whatever can easily kill a dwagon, in this case...) and then the body would fall in the enemy hex, where they could destroy it so it couldn't be decrypted. An archon could either return or, hopefully, send out a thinkagram before dying.
Infidel wrote:I disagree with that assessment rather strongly. You quoted where I mentioned encapsulation and misinformation, so I don't see how you can make such a statement as an argument against my point, without even addressing it.
HailGreen28 wrote:Good points. Archons would probably work. Maybe you could use a warlord riding a Dwagon for that. Dunno which would be more expensive or efficient. Maybe Maggie could handle relaying info real-time from the Archon or warlord...... to an Archon or Ansom/Wanda directly.ftl wrote:HailGreen28 wrote:
3. Maybe Ansom should scout the same way he did at the sub-battle of the Dwagon Donut. Send an expendable unit into a hex first, to see what's there.
It's not that easy - remember, bats have a special that lets them scout automatically. Most units would need to return to relay the information - which would be tricky because unled units auto-engage, so you have to send units with leadership if you want it to be possible to scout out the location of a large enemy force. It would have to be archons - an unled Dwagon would automatically engage the enemy, probably die if it finds anything interesting (interesting is pretty much defined as whatever can easily kill a dwagon, in this case...) and then the body would fall in the enemy hex, where they could destroy it so it couldn't be decrypted. An archon could either return or, hopefully, send out a thinkagram before dying.
Yeah it would be good tactics for the Coalition to burn/destroy the Dwagon corpse before Wanda got there.
I figure whatever unit you send in is a goner, but I think the benefits of successfully taking Jetsone's capital this turn is worth spending a few Archons or Dwagons on scouting. They might not fire all their defense at my scout, might not even have to in order to obliterate the scout. But at least I have a chance to find a weak spot, break a veil, or at least have some idea what I'm up against. Long as I don't use up my move to either hit the garrison, or withdraw to a safe postion if say I see 600 Charlie's Archons there and it's no veil.
BTW- Please Wanda don't hit the bridge! The Princes wouldn't leave themselves unprotected. DON'T DO IT WANDA!!!!!!!!!
John Campbell wrote:dstorrs wrote:Also, what's up with the Bride of Frankenstein hair, garter-belt, and no-pants-whatsoever? Oh Wanda, I weep for you.
She's dressed as Magenta from the end of the Rocky Horror Picture Show.
Which is okay with me, except that it gives me this terrible vision of Sizemore as Riff-Raff in the same scene. Actually, I guess that isn't any worse than actual Riff-Raff.
dannom wrote:Why would Ansom's brothers assume that the flyers would not be used in the up coming battle?
Not seeing any flyers with the siege troops prior to the unveiling should signal that they are elsewhere and the city still needs to be defended against them.
For example they could be several hex behind and still could be used against the city.
Welf von Ehrwald wrote:Don't forget about the HobitTM, Hyatt, Sofa King, FoxMud and Transylvito casters.
Darkside007 wrote:Menas, that requires Jetstone can respond to the new information recieved; they can't. Either they prepped for a dragon ambush or they didn't, they can't make those preparations now.
splintermute wrote:I think it's entirely possible that Spacerock will pull some surprise out of a hat - they seem to have a magic user specifically designed for that purpose.
Lord Kasavin wrote:I forsee him pulling a Dwagon out of his hat.
1. Parson should be running calcs! The Bracer can predict the future! (Maybe that would make for a dull story)
ftl wrote:Having your chief warlord not know his own plan is a far greater stupidity than taking the risk that "yes, if they capture the chief warlord, they can find out all his plans."

ftl wrote:
Having your chief warlord not know his own plan is a far greater stupidity than taking the risk that "yes, if they capture the chief warlord, they can find out all his plans."
Decryption hasn't actually changed that much with respect to intelligence gathering - before, if you could capture a unit, you could interrogate it for all its info. Decryption might work faster and better, and perhaps it's easier to croak and then capture the body rather than capture the person alive... but I don't think those differences are big enough to suddenly do drastic things like deny your own chief warlord information about the battle plan he's supposed to be leading.
The cost of having your own warlords not know their own battleplan is much higher than the risk of having one of them fall and reveal said battleplan.

Users browsing this forum: Althernai and 7 guests