
Salvage wrote:Graet Update and Im glad Wrigley got to stab something.
me wrote:The difference in the treatment of individuals is simple: wargames tend to ignore them, except where the scale of battle is small enough, and even then they are treated as units, frp games tend to focus on them.


ftl wrote:No, croaking a level 1 Warlord accomplishes nothing, tactically.
Ford's plan didn't work at all. He intended to take the led stacks and engage important targets. That failed - the led stacks tried to get to trem and couldn't. After the leadership was dusted, all the remaining infantry, being unled, attacked, and yeah they managed to inflict some minor casualties - it mentioned that Jetstone lost 1 infantry unit for every 3 that GK lost, and that was in the stack NOT led by Tremennis. And sure, maybe they lost a Level 1 Warlord or so. (I don't think Jetstone's Lvl 1 Warlords are that big of a deal - Jetstone's got plenty of Warlords to spare, and they have plenty of high-level ones, not newbies. Trem specifically picked out his low-level Warlords for this assault so they could try and level, and because they're more expendable.) But I'm pretty sure that this is a flavor update, and that Jetstone losing a level 1 Warlord isn't going to have any sort of tactical significance.
(Though, if Wanda survives, maybe that level 1 Warlord will be decrypted and we'll see her again!)

gazes_also wrote: About the only admirable quality of Stanley is that he rose from being just like Wigley once, an ordinary grunt.

oslecamo2 wrote:I keep defending my theory that that is precisely the reason why Stanley isn't so bright.
He didn't pop as a fancy prince versed in the arts of war, strategy and diplomacy. He poped a stabber with a very simplistic mind.
Then bang, find hammer, get promoted to warlord to heir to overlord. But his mental stats didn't increase that much.
Meanwhile pretty much every other important character started as an important expensive units. Heirs, mancers, warlords. They probably get a fat bonus to mental stats out of the bat with powerfull minds. They're born smart because they cost extra smucks and are expected to make decisions. Stanley was born cheap cannon fodder that doesn't need to think.
So, what would you do if it was you? One day you're a single minded foot soldier, one month later you're the supreme leader of your faction. Do you think your brain can grow fast enough to grasp the change?
I think not. Stanley just got unlucky with the mental stats as he was born the lowest of lowest. On the other hand, he's a melee machine (able to punch trough Caesar, Transylvitto's ace).

Lord Kasavin wrote:Actually, I believe Stanley was promoted to Warlord BEFORE atuning to the Arkenhammer. So, he must have had some distinction as an Stabber beforehand.
oslecamo2 wrote:If it's a paid upgrade, one needs to take in acount survival of the fittest kinda applies to Erfworld. An unit who survives several battles is probably worthy of promoting. Perhaps promoting a high level piker produces a stronger unit than making a warlord from scratch?
Either way, I can perfectly see Stanley being promoted just because he's damn good at the frontline.

Dante wrote:TheCat wrote:One wonders if the enemy leader that Wrigley speared was named Mint.
Nah. The joke, as before, is that Wrigley has never used his spear. Therefore, Wrigley's spear is mint.
gazes_also wrote:oslecamo2 wrote:If it's a paid upgrade, one needs to take in acount survival of the fittest kinda applies to Erfworld. An unit who survives several battles is probably worthy of promoting. Perhaps promoting a high level piker produces a stronger unit than making a warlord from scratch?
Either way, I can perfectly see Stanley being promoted just because he's damn good at the frontline.
I would theorize some kind of battlefield promotion that may be unusual but not totally outrageous.
How about:
In a stack that becomes unled due to croaking of its warlord, if that stack survives AND defeats an opposing led stack, the ranking trooper is promoted to level 1 warlord as well as the remaining troops leveling normally.
This supposes that as well as individual XP there is squad leadership XP which would normally go to the warlord, but in his absence confers squad-leader status on the highest ranked trooper.
It wouldn't be a common occurrence as the life expectancy in an unled stack is pretty low, but if one does survive it shows somebody has potential.
Just a thought.

Gez wrote:Dante wrote:TheCat wrote:One wonders if the enemy leader that Wrigley speared was named Mint.
Nah. The joke, as before, is that Wrigley has never used his spear. Therefore, Wrigley's spear is mint.
I propose anyway that this warlord was named Mint. Britney Mint.




cdrcjsn wrote:I'm in the Wriggley killed a warlord camp. He mentions that the level 1 warlord was female, and we see him stabbing a female, so that sorta fits.
Storywise though, it makes more sense for Wriggley to accomplish something than not. We already had the viewpoint of decrypted from earlier, so that wasn't much of a reason to present this solely for that.
But what does this accomplish? Is Trem going to be more hesitant about attacking Wanda's stack if a warlord is croaked unexpectedly?
Then again, Rob might just be flexing his writing muscles and wanted to write about Wriggley and this update doesn't mean much in the longer term. /shrug.

gazes_also wrote:I would theorize some kind of battlefield promotion that may be unusual but not totally outrageous.
How about:
In a stack that becomes unled due to croaking of its warlord, if that stack survives AND defeats an opposing led stack, the ranking trooper is promoted to level 1 warlord as well as the remaining troops leveling normally.
This supposes that as well as individual XP there is squad leadership XP which would normally go to the warlord, but in his absence confers squad-leader status on the highest ranked trooper.
It wouldn't be a common occurrence as the life expectancy in an unled stack is pretty low, but if one does survive it shows somebody has potential.
Just a thought.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests