Whoa. So much to respond to. Look, if you're not quoted here, but you were talking to me, just assume I'm trying to fit a response to you too in here somehow. (And not necessarily merely under a quote from you, if in fact you are quoted).
Alexei P wrote:I think BLAND's main point was that Charlie had the means to crush GK, had he so wished (to support the "Charlie is way too strong" argument), regardless of whether or not it was convenient for him to do so. I tend to agree. Although to be fair, even with the (as of yet hypothetical) ability to eavesdrop on any Thinkagram at will, that Dish ain't got nothing on Wanda's "steamroll you with your own mooks for free" thing (which is my pet peeve). Most sides don't even have thinkamancers, presumably. So far in the story, we've seen only 2 that have one on hand.
Thank you, but I'm actually bolder in my claims.
It's been said that Charlie waited for Royals to be desperate. That happened once already, yet Charlie did not interfere. There's a lot of rationalization for that thrown around (some link spell would not have been effective, no diplomatic contact, biding time ...). These ring hollow to me. Charlie wants business, and would gladly have made it so that business flowed back as usual, as soon as possible.
This may not even have required GK to be put down (but a boom head-of-state-shot is also not to be excluded), but whatever it would have required, it seems to me to have been within Charlie's grasp.
After all, Charlescomm, some people claim, considered offering Kingworld free of charge. Even if it wouldn't have saved Unaroyal, it would have made it possible to improve reputation among royals.
Plus, a side with such good intelligence and fast versatile units could have loads of tricks to do. As one example, an archon relay on Unaroyal royalty. So many options when you're nigh omnipotent. And with connections in the MK, and a sympathetic caster in one of the kingdoms, it's weird that nothing AT ALL was tried.
MonteCristo wrote:At Unaroyal however, Wanda had an army that was made up of THOUSANDS... and your assumption that they did not have a lot of archers, is purely that, an assumption... baseless in fact
I base it on the apparent lack of Archers when attacking Jetstone. You'd think a few would have been useful, whatever the real plan for that siege would have been.
splintermute wrote:Dwagons aren't natural allies - they're feral creatures. There's no reason to assume that because he can influence one he can automatically influence the other.
Charlie can hack Eyebooks, and
MonteCristo believes that therefore hacking Thinkagrams is not that shocking; oh wait, you believe the same. Similarly, Charlie can influence natural allies; feral creatures that don't even have an allegiance to begin with- not that big a stretch.
splintermute wrote:All your other complaints right now have nothing to do with the specific possible "revelation" in this page - they're just a tired rehash of the arguments you raised after the Kingworld spell. They were fun to discuss then, but they're boring and repetitive now.
I'm sorry you feel that way, but even sorryer that the reason why I made these complaints then didn't change. Charlie's still a way too convenient plot device when it comes to providing an opposition for Parson.
Raza wrote:The strategic implications of having previous thinkagrams tapped have been noted, and so far not that big.
Not sure what this means. The ability to eavesdrop on your opponents has always been a prized asset.
MonteCristo wrote:Considering how charlie was able to hack the eyebooks, and is speculated to even go so far as being able to read Parsons notes, i don't see how thinkagram hacking is such a shocker.. {snip}
I remember saying, in the first post here, that having this ability makes sense in some ways. That doesn't change the basic fact, that Charlie is waaaay too powerful and at once very capricious in wielding that power, essentially only using it when it's convenient to the plot.
Do I need to qualify this by saying "assuming Charlie hacked Parson"? 'Cause that's the hypothetical scenario that I'm saying I would not like.
MonteCristo wrote:besides, this can help keep up the suspense... little trope in writing; when the readers know what a character is planning, the plan is bound to fail, but when the plan is kept a secret from the readers, then it is bound to succeed... right now we have just the right amount of ambiguity to not be sure how things will play out in the upcoming fight... we don't know Parsons plan, but at the same time we have the possibility that Charlie knows the plan and will be able to advise Trem
Because God forbid Trem could have created a good counter plan all by himself. Especially since, supposedly, Jetstone is already at such an advantage that even Parson considers his plan unlikely to succeed. Seriously, do we need Charlie to provide yet more muscle flexing? Can't we believe that some warlord in Erfworld would manage an efficient response to a desperate GK?
The whole point of this is lost if you keep it a secret.