Welf von Ehrwald wrote:I can't imagine what comes next. What could Stanley talk with his former archnemesis? Parson apparently did his job. The only thing I can imagine is, that Stanley wants to make Ansom his new chief warlord and use Parson as advisor. Maybe Stanley would like to adapt the transylvito stile.
Anton Gaist wrote:I think it could go somewhere along the lines of "Here we have this huge fat bloke who can apparently overcome any scenario the Titans throw at him. Now, what do we use him for?"
"Uhm, how about keep him in the city and get him to make all decisions and have me in the battlefield carrying out his orders... in your name, of course."
"Really?"
"Yah-huh."
"Ok then."

Goshen wrote:I don't see Stanley feeling seriously threatened by Hamster, because he can disband Hamster at any time. Can he disband Wanda too? That would be an awesomely stupid move which I doubt he will do.
teratorn wrote:It won't work like that. Ansom's devotion for Parson is huge, he wants to be his lackey.

Bobby Archer wrote:teratorn wrote:It won't work like that. Ansom's devotion for Parson is huge, he wants to be his lackey.
But lackey doesn't necessarily have to mean servant/aide de camp. There's no reason Ansom couldn't be Parson's lackey, acting on his behalf, croaking other sides. This seems to be more in line with what Ansom has in mind.
Mikalyaran wrote:Yeah dude, holy crap...if people are right and Wanda can rebel against Stanley...well he better hope they are wrong about her inclination to do so. I still maintain that she won't. At least she won't during the summer updates. Something as big as that would be handled in a book not summer updates.
luxgladius wrote:I keep seeing this said, and I haven't seen any people who think it's unlikely, so I thought I'd weigh in. Wanda has no reason to want Stanley dead. She's shown that she's quite capable of manipulating and controlling him, and his goals coincide with hers for the most part. He is attuned to the Arkenhammer, which clearly is something rare enough that she can't rely on being able to find a replacement. It makes more sense for her to leave him to be the figurehead, the one who is hated, and for her to work behind the scenes, at least until such time as he sees the leash around his neck and starts becoming a nuisance.


HandofShadows wrote:And we see that Stanely is more than a little worried a Parson. But however worried he is, he isn't worried enough.


Mikalyaran wrote:HandofShadows wrote: And we see that Stanely is more than a little worried a Parson. But however worried he is, he isn't worried enough.
i didn't see anything about the way Stanley reacted about Parson as indicating worry.
KBF wrote:So uh, guys...
"My Mistress favors..."
Yeah dude, holy crap...if people are right and Wanda can rebel against Stanley...well he better hope they are wrong about her inclination to do so. I still maintain that she won't. At least she won't during the summer updates. Something as big as that would be handled in a book not summer updates.


gameboy1234 wrote:I think Wanda will revolt, but not over the summer. She needs to build more and she needs those dragons. Eventually Stanley will be superfluous, but right now Stanley's essential. I don't even think Wanda will revolt at the beginning of book two, although she could revolt at the end.
valce wrote:She hasn't really expressed herself either way with regards to the 'holy' aspect of the Tools


SteveMB wrote:"I have no desire to be emperor. I prefer to work behind the scenes. The reward is nearly as great, and the risk far, far less."
--Londo Mollari


JenBurdoo wrote:I'm confused. From context it looks like Parson isn't present on the parade ground. Shouldn't he be? And if he isn't, why not?

Skorj wrote:"TWFKAP" would make a great sound effect too!

Users browsing this forum: Lipkin, SNfinity, Xarx and 11 guests