



Dr Pepper wrote:And once again, Rob tweaks the collective nose of the forum. So sacrifice/fall/decrypt is not Parson's great plan, it's merely the best that a lesser intellect like Jack's could come up with.
Well then, let the speculation begin afresh.


Nows7 wrote:This update was all about questions and answers, bookended by a pair of riddles. We found why Jack didn't turn, A reason why Wanda didn't thats not the one she gave. We heard Jack rephrase the question from "How do we survive" in the light of Parson's answer. Jack even gave acknowlegement to Wanda's question regarding uncroaked casters. Most every line of dialog is a question.

Dr Pepper wrote:And once again, Rob tweaks the collective nose of the forum. So sacrifice/fall/decrypt is not Parson's great plan, it's merely the best that a lesser intellect like Jack's could come up with.
Well then, let the speculation begin afresh.
DevilDan wrote:
Rob has plotmancy on his side and complete knowledge of the rules, but I always doubted our collective brainstorming could come too close to guessing to Parson's plan.


Knight13 wrote: The question is whether that's because he sees the futility of Erfworld's current state or because he's not entirely sane.

fjolnir wrote:Well concidering that Naughtymancy has 2 schools that literally break rules (croakamancy brings back the dead, which bypasses croaking rules and turning rules as well. Retconjuration LITERALLY reshifts reality to suit the user, though only the titans practice it) while luckamancers literally can shift bad breaks to good and good breaks to bad...




Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], ManaCaster and 2 guests