LordDarksea wrote:so what happens when you uncroak spent black-powder...?
Glome wrote:What makes people think that Parson knows how to make gunpowder offhand, or even if he did know how to make gunpowder, how would he know how to get the ingredients from nature? And even if they did have gunpowder already, could he really make an effective gun? I mean, they did have guns throughout the middle ages, they just weren't used because they weren't as effective as crossbows. We don't even know if Parson could find a smith to help him out, and it is seems pretty implausible that Parson is carrying around the information to make effective modern weaponry in his head, however smart he may be.
Seriously, if any of you were suddenly transported to the middle ages with no preparation or reference material, what could you really invent? Folding chairs maybe, modern weapons probably not.

Glome wrote:What makes people think that Parson knows how to make gunpowder offhand, or even if he did know how to make gunpowder, how would he know how to get the ingredients from nature?

Sethram wrote:Glome wrote:What makes people think that Parson knows how to make gunpowder offhand, or even if he did know how to make gunpowder, how would he know how to get the ingredients from nature?
Eh, urea, burnt plants, biological waste(feces, decaying creatures) all add up to get potassium nitrates, or salt petre. And we do have a guy who specializes in dealing with huge pits of waste.
Granted the process takes over a year, they'd have the resources for it.
Glome wrote:
Right, but I'm not arguing that the ingredients are impossible to get in Erfworld, rather I'm arguing that it is highly unlikely that Parson knows what the ingredients of gunpowder are off the top of his head, that he knows what percentage of each ingredient he needs to mix or how to mix it, and how to obtain these ingredients, even though this all can be done.

Kreistor wrote:Saltpeter. Cool. Where do you get it? Just knowing the ingredient doesn't mean you can make it. And if you knew it came from feces, would you be able to figure out how to recognize it if you tried to experiment in order to get it? Or even if you knew the theory, without having practiced it, could you do it correctly from the knowledge in your brain, without the original text? And no, don't post to prove you do know it: you can find it online if you know where to look, so you're not proving anything. The point is that a little knowledge is not enough.

Anton Gaist wrote:I mean, Stanley betrayed Saline I.V., who was his Overlord. So what's stopping Parson from betraying Stanley?
Zeku wrote:Unrelated, but how much XP did Parson gain from the last battle? He was in another zone when the enemy units actually died, so he's probably still at level 2, or whatever it was.

MarbitChow wrote:Since he appears to have no stats, the argument can be made that he also has no levels (although the world does react to him as if he did have them - troops get a leadership bonus from him, for example).


Glome wrote:No, while I'm sure there is some foreshadowing going on here, I'm pretty sure this interlude isn't foreshadowing the use gunpowder.

Aris Katsaris wrote:Anton Gaist wrote:I mean, Stanley betrayed Saline I.V., who was his Overlord. So what's stopping Parson from betraying Stanley?
It's just an assumption you're making that Stanley betrayed Salive IV. It seems an obvious conclusion based on the suspiciousness of those events, but we still don't have confirmation that Stanley actually betrayed his Overlord.

Darkside007 wrote:Unless the writers deliberately contradict all the evidence presented, Stanley set up the revolt. I'm getting tired of the small number of people screaming "OMG SPECULATION!" every time somebody builds on something that wasn't explicitly said, but heavily implied or evidenced.


Arkenputtyknife wrote:We know Parson has stats. Parson knows he has stats. They aren't visible, but he worked out his leadership stat empirically. So please, let's end this “he has no stats” boop.


gameboy1234 wrote:That, and Parson's Stupid Meal told us all that Parson is level 2.
http://www.giantitp.com/comics/erf0084.html

gameboy1234 wrote:Darkside007 wrote:Unless the writers deliberately contradict all the evidence presented, Stanley set up the revolt. I'm getting tired of the small number of people screaming "OMG SPECULATION!" every time somebody builds on something that wasn't explicitly said, but heavily implied or evidenced.
But it is speculation. More importantly, I think it's a lot more likely that Wanda was the one who instigated Saline IV's death. Given her skill with Thinkmancy spells (remember Jillian and the guard outside?) And with her lack of loyalty spell, it almost has to be her. I doubt Stanley could even conceive of a plot against his overlord, much less carry it out. He really is an imbecile.
Thinkmancy suggestion on some Hobgoblins, croak them when Stanley gets back for regicide, all clean and neat and no one the wiser.


Kreistor wrote:Saltpeter. Cool. Where do you get it? Just knowing the ingredient doesn't mean you can make it. And if you knew it came from feces, would you be able to figure out how to recognize it if you tried to experiment in order to get it? Or even if you knew the theory, without having practiced it, could you do it correctly from the knowledge in your brain, without the original text? And no, don't post to prove you do know it: you can find it online if you know where to look, so you're not proving anything. The point is that a little knowledge is not enough.
shneekeythelost wrote:However, the problem everyone is forgetting is that Erfworld doesn't operate on Physics, it operates on Game Mechanics, which are variously interpreted by various characters which Parson has interacted with. Straining out urea and other biological waste products may not create a nitrate-rich sludge to turn into saltpeter in Erfworld because such things simply do not exist.

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], LordAcme and 9 guests