Oberon wrote: Mark this post and quote it to mock me in the future once there is another volcano uncroaking. I'll be wrong, and the story will suck a little bit more for the destruction of the unique ending of Book 1. Either way I lose.
Oberon wrote:First off, there is nothing to suggest that the casters have time to do anything other then enter a portal after they uncroak a volcano. That they can take any other action than that is just speculation. Secondly, it wasn't the GK turn when they did their cast. So even if your speculation is correct, it's only usefully correct when it is your turn.
Oberon wrote: Third, multi-hex trap. So even in the fringe case where you're right about actions and it is your turn, you've got to hope that your movement speed puts you outside a multi-hex radius before you all die.
Oberon wrote:Forth, you're investing more and more into this... 3 casters, 3 high move mounts, and a warlord. Every additional resource increases your cost and lowers your chances of getting a good return on the investment.
Oberon wrote:And yet more resources. 3 casters, 3 fast mounts, a warlord, and infantry which will be left behind to die. Or are you now going to mount all of them on fast mounts?
Oberon wrote:I've already addressed both the supposition that mounted movement eliminates all risk, and the ever increasing resources you're throwing at this. Sooner or later you just can't afford it.
And wich other sides could pull that off? Who else has both a massive fleet of dwagons and a master foolmancer to disguise them in order to lure the enemy defenses out of the capital?Oberon wrote:Stanley didn't leave because a tri-mancer casting party was coming to kill him. If you're not in the exact same position as Stanley when the need comes for the tri-mancer, you can't just assume that you're going to fly away before you get caught. There's no guarantee of advance notice, Jetstone thought they were going to bottle up the GK forces in an infantry and siege battle hexes away from Jetstone. And then the major part of their army was flown past and they were about to be ended.
Oberon wrote:You can roll all you want, I've still pointed out a Overlord led battle that you decided to qualify away for some unknown reason.
Oberon wrote: While it wasn't an even exchange, things you're leaving out are that Stanley got Jack's sanity back and the GK side did kill at least one TV warlord. And headed back to GK, where he needed to go. So as I said, he didn't lose.
Oberon wrote:That is no basis for making a decision. The guy with the nukes might have plenty of reasons for being hesitant to use them. Many have been floated about in this thread alone. Only the fool would decide that a lack of "spamming" a spell meant that it couldn't or wouldn't be used at any time the owner felt it was really necessary. When your neighboring country has exploded a nuke, you don't attack it (um, as a national entity, and with conventional weapons or warfare, just to rule out the pedants) thinking that they are all out of nukes now. This simple fact has worked on our world for 65 years.
Oberon wrote:Yes...now that you wrote all fails by Wanda thanks to her love, we can say: Wanda did more damage to GK than Charlie didOberon wrote:But not more than....Stanley!
Selexor wrote:Is it worth pointing out that I apologised several pages ago for derailing this thread and have since been doing my best to stay on-topic?
BLANDCorporatio wrote:DoctorJest wrote:"Wolves are like dogs, but dogs are like dogs, so therefore: kittens".
DoctorJest, if I weren't referentially married to my sig I'd use that instead.

Foolamancer wrote:No, it's more like dwagons, Caster, Warlords, a promise of no future conflict with Jetstone (which is still a powerful side, even though it doesn't match Gobwin Knob), and hints of a future alliance in exchange for Jetstone. I'd say that's a pretty good trade. I mean, I'd take it.

Althernai wrote:Foolamancer wrote:No, it's more like dwagons, Caster, Warlords, a promise of no future conflict with Jetstone (which is still a powerful side, even though it doesn't match Gobwin Knob), and hints of a future alliance in exchange for Jetstone. I'd say that's a pretty good trade. I mean, I'd take it.
It's a very reasonable offer assuming that the only alternative is the slaughter of all Gobwin Knob units in Jetstone's airspace and as far as Trammenis knows, this assumption is true. However, Parson knows better which is why he is not negotiating.

trotsky wrote:Considering "The 'Actually Quite Spicy' Bland Corporation" was included even though, if I remember correctly, he gave up the argument as futile during the first round (when it was still considered on topic, a novel concept) I think you're stuck.
Besides, I got the impression he was just selecting the people who make the longest, most detailed, and most passionate arguments in general, not just on a... particular subject.
falldowngoboom wrote:Also... A hobgobwin in a tux?? http://www.erfworld.com/book-2-archive/ ... -01-06.jpg he's in this pic too. http://www.erfworld.com/book-2-archive/ ... -01-29.png WHY IS HE IN A TUX!? He even has a bowtie!! There is another hobgobwin in a tux on a pink dwagon in this one. http://www.erfworld.com/book-2-archive/ ... -02-24.jpg
Selexor wrote:The problem, unfortunately, is that Gobwin Knob wouldn't accept. The Pliers are, to every Uncroaked unit, a holy artifact. Wanda, as their attuned wielder, is literally the messiah of all the Decrypted. Tramennis' offer would be generous, but generosity doesn't count to religious fanatics who see things only in black-and-white, particularly if - and I mean no offence when I say this, but it's true - unlike many other militant religious fanatics, the Decrypted don't have to accept what they believe on blind faith. They know for a fact that they're right. They have quite literally been given a second life by the power of a Tool of the Titans. And since Stanley honestly believes that he's been chosen by the Titans to unite the Arkentools, agreeing to give up the Pliers and their attuned wielder goes against everything he believes. He'd never do it.
Even assuming that Stanley grudgingly accepted for the time being, or that Parson agreed without Stanley's permission, it doesn't solve things. Parson or Stanley could order Wanda to accept the surrender terms. But since it would involve her losing the Pliers, and almost certainly getting croaked, she wouldn't want to do it. And her Loyalty is... unpredictable, at best. Not to mention that we have no idea if Parson or Stanley possess the ability to actually command the Decrypted, or if their ultimate loyalty is to Wanda. Because if it is, and she doesn't want to give up the Pliers, then who knows what might happen?
It's a sticky problem, is what I'm saying.

Casters can also spend juice, doing most things casters do: make scrolls, items, golems, uncroak, turn Shmuckers to gems (or vice-versa but that doesn't cost juice), upgrade units, etc.
Spells are trickier. Most can't be cast unless there are enemy units in the same hex/city, but some like Lookamancy and Thinkagrams can be cast anytime.
Planning, communications, some forms of scouting, take-offs and landings of flyers (within the hex or a city you control) are all possible off-turn. You can lay some traps. You can re-stack all you want.
When you fall, one of three things happens: you are injured (possibly only slightly), you are incapacitated (you croak in one turn if not given Healomancy), or you just croak. Height does seem to have some bearing on this, but it's essentially random. You can croak from like a three foot fall.

1-Who rescued GK after King Saline got killed? If not for Stanley, GK wouldn't be standing there at all.
2-Who decided to make the initial tri-mancy link wich allowed Hamster unlimited intelegency and the talkbooks?
3-Who requested all the specific conditions that made Hamster be summoned and not, let's say, somebody who couldn't speak english, or be able to breath Erfworld air?
4-Who attuned to the arkenhammer wich provides control of the mighty dwagons?
5-Who decided to pull back from the capital so Hamster could go all out against the overwhelming enemy? Someone like Ansom would've stayed, and then Hamster would be locked in a no-win situation where if he blew up the city he killed the ruler and lost anyway.
rkyeun wrote:Roses are red.
Violets are blue.

Foolamancer wrote:And I don't think anyone is disagreeing. It isn't a great offer if you possess all the relevant information. Trammenis doesn't. He thinks that it's a fantastic offer.
Trammenis thinks that he's giving Gobwin Knob a buttload of free units (some of which are extremely powerful) in addition to a ceasefire with overtones of future alliance. Gobwin Knob knows that it's going to keep those units anyway, and that it can't accept the offer in the first place on account of the Decrypted units.
Objectively, yes, it'd be a very bad idea for GK to accept Trammenis' offer. But Trammenis doesn't know that.

zilfallon wrote:1-Who rescued GK after King Saline got killed? If not for Stanley, GK wouldn't be standing there at all.
2-Who decided to make the initial tri-mancy link wich allowed Hamster unlimited intelegency and the talkbooks?
3-Who requested all the specific conditions that made Hamster be summoned and not, let's say, somebody who couldn't speak english, or be able to breath Erfworld air?
4-Who attuned to the arkenhammer wich provides control of the mighty dwagons?
5-Who decided to pull back from the capital so Hamster could go all out against the overwhelming enemy? Someone like Ansom would've stayed, and then Hamster would be locked in a no-win situation where if he blew up the city he killed the ruler and lost anyway.
5) Stanley retreated from the capital so Hamster could go out? Now you're wrong about his intention here. That may be the result, but his intention was to leave all his side to death and go found a new faction somewhere else. He totally left them to death. If Stanley stayed in GK, Hamster wouldn't have to explode to volcano. Remember, Stanley is damn OP when it comes to action.
BLANDCorporatio wrote:DoctorJest wrote:"Wolves are like dogs, but dogs are like dogs, so therefore: kittens".
DoctorJest, if I weren't referentially married to my sig I'd use that instead.

trotsky wrote:zilfallon wrote:1-Who rescued GK after King Saline got killed? If not for Stanley, GK wouldn't be standing there at all.
2-Who decided to make the initial tri-mancy link wich allowed Hamster unlimited intelegency and the talkbooks?
3-Who requested all the specific conditions that made Hamster be summoned and not, let's say, somebody who couldn't speak english, or be able to breath Erfworld air?
4-Who attuned to the arkenhammer wich provides control of the mighty dwagons?
5-Who decided to pull back from the capital so Hamster could go all out against the overwhelming enemy? Someone like Ansom would've stayed, and then Hamster would be locked in a no-win situation where if he blew up the city he killed the ruler and lost anyway.
5) Stanley retreated from the capital so Hamster could go out? Now you're wrong about his intention here. That may be the result, but his intention was to leave all his side to death and go found a new faction somewhere else. He totally left them to death. If Stanley stayed in GK, Hamster wouldn't have to explode to volcano. Remember, Stanley is damn OP when it comes to action.
Well, I don't think intention matters. I believe the discussion is about whether Wanda hurt her side more than Stanley did. Wanda never intended for Jillian to break her compulsion spell, but it happened and cost the side a fair amount. Stanley didn't intend to provide Parson the freedom to do what needed to be done to win, but that is what resulted, saving the side.
In a city airspace they could just drop arrows or whatever, and yellow dwagons can crap from the airspace off turn. Could be useful. I wanna talk to Sizemore about bombs. Maybe he can do portable Dirtamancy traps we could drop from dwagons.
rkyeun wrote:Roses are red.
Violets are blue.

effataigus wrote:Btw Dr. Pepper, what do the numbers in your Avatar and sig refer to?

zilfallon wrote:I think the yellow dwagons didn't just crap:In a city airspace they could just drop arrows or whatever, and yellow dwagons can crap from the airspace off turn. Could be useful. I wanna talk to Sizemore about bombs. Maybe he can do portable Dirtamancy traps we could drop from dwagons.
Maybe Parson made Sizemore "implant" explosive Dirtamancy crap traps into yellow dwagons before the air force took off from GK? (This KLOG was written when Jack was at GK together with Hamster)
If their regular crap was strong enough to melt roofs and croak infantry, then how did Bogroll survive being crapped to? At the first pages, a yellow dwagon crapped on Bogroll, and Bogroll was able to "protect" himself with just an umbrella. So, unless that umbrella is tougher than a roof, yellow dwagons at Spacerock didn't just crap, they crapped Dirtamancy traps inside them!

Foolamancer wrote:Lamech wrote:Saying he is offering dwagons a caster, and warlords "in exhange for peace", is really misleading. While Jetstone can kill those things, GK can kill Jetstone.
But Gobwin Knob would have to do so without many of its dwagons, in addition to being minus an Arkentool, a master-class Croakamancer and an equally skilled Foolamancer. While it would still be possible, it would be much more expensive than it would be otherwise. A mutual nonaggression treaty would allow Gobwin Knob to focus on fighting the rest of the Coalition while being safe from attack from Jetstone.
Of course, it would put Jetstone on the outs with the rest of the Coalition. Not fighting against Gobwin Knob - and, arguably, actually assisting them - won't make the rest of the Coalition happy. But Trammenis has already made it clear that he considers Royalism v. 'Toolism to be obsolete. He could very well be planning to actually join Gobwin Knob, and simply be using this as the first step. Nonaggression, followed by trade agreements (assuming that Erfworld has such a thing), followed by an actual alliance. From Trammenis' point of view, he is actually giving Parson a genuinely good offer. Keep some of the most powerful units that you would otherwise lose, and you don't have to deal with us during the rest of your war. Oh, and we'll end up actually helping you in future, as well.
"No future conflict with Jetstone", isn't something in GK favor unless they really want to go eat up the other weak sides like FAQ or Translovito right now. And if they wanted that they would have turned back at the bridge with a non-aggression treaty. They want Jetstone.No, it's more like dwagons, Caster, Warlords, a promise of no future conflict with Jetstone (which is still a powerful side, even though it doesn't match Gobwin Knob), and hints of a future alliance in exchange for Jetstone. I'd say that's a pretty good trade. I mean, I'd take it.So its more like dwagons, caster and warlords for all of Jetstone. Thats not even close to an even trade for GK, especially when we consider that GK loses the Jetstone cities they still stand to take.
Ansan Gotti wrote:zilfallon wrote:I think the yellow dwagons didn't just crap:In a city airspace they could just drop arrows or whatever, and yellow dwagons can crap from the airspace off turn. Could be useful. I wanna talk to Sizemore about bombs. Maybe he can do portable Dirtamancy traps we could drop from dwagons.
Maybe Parson made Sizemore "implant" explosive Dirtamancy crap traps into yellow dwagons before the air force took off from GK? (This KLOG was written when Jack was at GK together with Hamster)
If their regular crap was strong enough to melt roofs and croak infantry, then how did Bogroll survive being crapped to? At the first pages, a yellow dwagon crapped on Bogroll, and Bogroll was able to "protect" himself with just an umbrella. So, unless that umbrella is tougher than a roof, yellow dwagons at Spacerock didn't just crap, they crapped Dirtamancy traps inside them!
Ooh, I kind of like this. It would also explain why Duke Antium didn't address yellow dwagons as siege in his thought process from this text update!
BLANDCorporatio wrote:DoctorJest wrote:"Wolves are like dogs, but dogs are like dogs, so therefore: kittens".
DoctorJest, if I weren't referentially married to my sig I'd use that instead.

zilfallon wrote:I think the yellow dwagons didn't just crap:In a city airspace they could just drop arrows or whatever, and yellow dwagons can crap from the airspace off turn. Could be useful. I wanna talk to Sizemore about bombs. Maybe he can do portable Dirtamancy traps we could drop from dwagons.
Maybe Parson made Sizemore "implant" explosive Dirtamancy crap traps into yellow dwagons before the air force took off from GK? (This KLOG was written when Jack was at GK together with Hamster)
If their regular crap was strong enough to melt roofs and croak infantry, then how did Bogroll survive being crapped to? At the first pages, a yellow dwagon crapped on Bogroll, and Bogroll was able to "protect" himself with just an umbrella. So, unless that umbrella is tougher than a roof, yellow dwagons at Spacerock didn't just crap, they crapped Dirtamancy traps inside them!
The ground came up, and Banana squashed into it, face first. The impact was hard enough that Parson was thrown out of the saddle and rolled on the bricks twice. As he lay in a heap, the nearby pikers immediately scrambled to his aid.
The dwagon roared angrily, and took off into the sky, leaving a steaming pile of acidic battlecrap on the pavement.

Lamech wrote:Foolamancer wrote:Lamech wrote:Saying he is offering dwagons a caster, and warlords "in exhange for peace", is really misleading. While Jetstone can kill those things, GK can kill Jetstone.
But Gobwin Knob would have to do so without many of its dwagons, in addition to being minus an Arkentool, a master-class Croakamancer and an equally skilled Foolamancer. While it would still be possible, it would be much more expensive than it would be otherwise. A mutual nonaggression treaty would allow Gobwin Knob to focus on fighting the rest of the Coalition while being safe from attack from Jetstone.
The rest of the coalition? What coalition? Haggar who was planning to betray them before they got stabbed in the back? Translovito who is being taken appart by its enemies? Jillian who just abandoned them? As far as I can see there is no coalition to aid Jetstone.
Of course, it would put Jetstone on the outs with the rest of the Coalition. Not fighting against Gobwin Knob - and, arguably, actually assisting them - won't make the rest of the Coalition happy. But Trammenis has already made it clear that he considers Royalism v. 'Toolism to be obsolete. He could very well be planning to actually join Gobwin Knob, and simply be using this as the first step. Nonaggression, followed by trade agreements (assuming that Erfworld has such a thing), followed by an actual alliance. From Trammenis' point of view, he is actually giving Parson a genuinely good offer. Keep some of the most powerful units that you would otherwise lose, and you don't have to deal with us during the rest of your war. Oh, and we'll end up actually helping you in future, as well.
Killing someone's superweapon doesn't seem like a great way to say "We want to help". More like "We don't like you, but we like dying less."
Any offer of possible alliance would be seen at best as "Hey lets go feast on the carcass of the rest of the RCC together!"
"No future conflict with Jetstone", isn't something in GK favor unless they really want to go eat up the other weak sides like FAQ or Translovito right now. And if they wanted that they would have turned back at the bridge with a non-aggression treaty. They want Jetstone.No, it's more like dwagons, Caster, Warlords, a promise of no future conflict with Jetstone (which is still a powerful side, even though it doesn't match Gobwin Knob), and hints of a future alliance in exchange for Jetstone. I'd say that's a pretty good trade. I mean, I'd take it.So its more like dwagons, caster and warlords for all of Jetstone. Thats not even close to an even trade for GK, especially when we consider that GK loses the Jetstone cities they still stand to take.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest