

Zeroberon wrote:So we know with 100% certainty that THIS IS HOW TRI-LINKS WORK, PERIOD END OF STORY.

Morgaln wrote:Some idle observation. It looks like we have seen so far more female than male casters; so far we have:
Female: Wanda, Maggie, Misty, Bunny, Janis, Marie, Vanna
Male: Sizemore, Jack, Ace, Cubbins, Benjamin, Dittomancer
Of those, the females tend to play a larger role in the story...

Oberon wrote:Interesting. So Wanda knew about the SPWL spell because Janice had had it made and intended it for her. I wonder what would have happened if Stanley had refused the high price?
Wanda "You won't pay the 350k shmuckers? Well, they are offering it for 300k. Still no? Next week it's Black Friday, and they have 3 for sale for a mere 150k, but I'll have to stand in line all night to get one of them."
MarbitChow wrote:Loved the update!Morgaln wrote:Some idle observation. It looks like we have seen so far more female than male casters; so far we have:
Female: Wanda, Maggie, Misty, Bunny, Janis, Marie, Vanna
Male: Sizemore, Jack, Ace, Cubbins, Benjamin, Dittomancer
Of those, the females tend to play a larger role in the story...
Although it has not been completely confirmed, I believe you can add Charlie to the list of males, which would tip the 'play a role' scale very heavily back in favor of the men.


fjolnir wrote:Marie is raising the hackles on my referencometer, anyone know`where she's from? that being said, good update, albeit one that was strongly foreshadowed.
what about carl sagan, orko, and spock from parson's previous MK field trip?


Sieggy wrote:So . . . does this confirm that Parson is, indeed, a hippiemancer? Or merely a tool for Hippymancy . . ? If he's actually a Hippymancer, then he has every right to proceed through the MK. And I have to wonder if there's any precedence in Erf history of a multi-class warlord / caster?
Raza wrote:Did they select Parson in advance, specifically? The update talks about something the casters don't know or are willing to keep hidden, but it's not clear to me how exactly the 'real aim' deviates from the spell's stated purpose in execution.

Users browsing this forum: davesnothere, Whispri and 14 guests