I was wondering which other argument was the "Game-winning argument". Nicely done Watermonkey.
LTDave, are you going to run another one of these any time soon, or would you mind me running one?
WaterMonkey314 wrote:Until Dave said there were 2 game-winning arguments, I was afraid even he hadn't noticed.
BLANDCorporatio wrote: One question to LtDave: you said you wanted to use that map you made for a more "numeric" campaign, and I was wondering if perhaps we could join efforts, in the sense that I'd run a game based on that TBfOddworld(x2) ruleset, on that map.
Shusagi wrote:LTDave, are you going to run another one of these any time soon, or would you mind me running one?

WaterMonkey314 wrote:@BLAND: Thank you for helping, but did you know that that was a game-winner? I'd be shocked if even House Ordos got tricked.
LTDave wrote:Tbf<> games are tactical, whereas I'm looking for somthing more Grand-Strategy of Empires aqnd Armies and Diplomacy and Spies.
You are welcome to use the map, though. May it bring you much joy. If you wish, I can send you the Photoshop version, which is a bit prettier.


Users browsing this forum: RandomWombat and 1 guest