boegiboe wrote:Why do folks speculate on the fourth Arkentool? Isn't it pretty obviously, based on the usual referential sense of humor of Erfworld, the Arkenstone of Tolkien? In other words, it mainly served as an in-joke that the Happy Meal said there were four known Arkentools.

But look at the good the Arkenpliers did for Jetstone - not much. Sure, Ansom killed uncroaked a bit more efficiently, but popping a second warlord to fight by his side would probably have worked almost as well.GaryThunder wrote:I would speculate on the fourth Arkentool. When you look at what colossal game-breakers the Arkendish and the Arkenpliers are (the Arkenhammer's also pretty good, but not that good), wouldn't you want to see if you could retrieve something that powerful that isn't being held by a ridiculously tough side like Jetstone, Charlescomm or modern Gobwin Knob? Probably?
I agree. It also eliminates one of the largest discrepancies that Charlie might have reflected: He could have been an Overlord who was also a caster. A mix of roles at which we had never even seen hinted elsewhere. And, if verified, should (Hopefully? Meh, it'll never die...) lay to rest the "Wanda is going to start her own Side" tinhattery.fjolnir wrote:I still think this this update cuts charlie out of being a thinkamancer preattunement, If he was he wouldn't be "an interloper" into their knowledge.
Zeroberon wrote:So we know with 100% certainty that THIS IS HOW TRI-LINKS WORK, PERIOD END OF STORY.
On the flip side, if the unattuned Whatevertool is just an Artifact combat bonus, and if attunement is both exceedingly rare (How many Jetstone Princes were handed the 'pliers in an attempt to attune?) or tied to fate (as in Wanda's Fate to eventually attune to a 'tool), maybe there are not many Sides who would bother. The real value in seeking to wrest an arkentool away from another Side would appear to lie in the denial of the attuned capabilities to the Side you've stolen the 'tool away from, and not in the hopes that your own Side will be able to exercise those same capabilities. Unless your pocket Predictamancer tells you otherwise...fractal wrote:But look at the good the Arkenpliers did for Jetstone - not much. Sure, Ansom killed uncroaked a bit more efficiently, but popping a second warlord to fight by his side would probably have worked almost as well.GaryThunder wrote:I would speculate on the fourth Arkentool. When you look at what colossal game-breakers the Arkendish and the Arkenpliers are (the Arkenhammer's also pretty good, but not that good), wouldn't you want to see if you could retrieve something that powerful that isn't being held by a ridiculously tough side like Jetstone, Charlescomm or modern Gobwin Knob? Probably?
Also, if you attack another side to take their Arkentool, you have to be afraid that someone else will do the same to you after you have it. Only a strong side is going to want to take that risk (or a very weak one, that needs to gamble on attunement).
Not necessarily. Jetstone was well known to possess the 'pliers. While it is possible that some far away Side will enter the story with ownership of the fourth "known" arkentool, I find it far more likely that the fourth 'tool is not currently owned and will be discovered. By whom? Parson, perhaps, although I am not predictamancing.GaryThunder wrote:I guess with that argument, it's likely that the fourth known Arkentool is held by a fairly strong side as well.
Zeroberon wrote:So we know with 100% certainty that THIS IS HOW TRI-LINKS WORK, PERIOD END OF STORY.
boegiboe wrote:Why do folks speculate on the fourth Arkentool? Isn't it pretty obviously, based on the usual referential sense of humor of Erfworld, the Arkenstone of Tolkien? In other words, it mainly served as an in-joke that the Happy Meal said there were four known Arkentools.

Agaric wrote:On page 1 quite a few people have been compiled and verified already (with one notable addition later).
From left to right, from top to bottom:
Unidentified Neck Guy - Unidentified Blonde Lady With No Visible Clothes - Aristotle - Carl Sagan - Derren Brown
Spock - Neil deGrasse Tyson - Psycho Mantis
Unidentified Brunette - Zelda
So, as far as I can see there are only 3 more people to find now...


Zeku wrote:This line of reasoning, that the primary (non-unit) function of each tool is to augment a particular ability of the holder, would mean that the arkenhammer is definitely being 'throttled' by the fact that Stanley is just a low-level pikeman. It would probably be truly fearsome if it attuned to a high level heavy, for example.

Stanley is just a low-level pikeman.
rkyeun wrote:Roses are red.
Violets are blue.

fractal wrote:Also, if you attack another side to take their Arkentool, you have to be afraid that someone else will do the same to you after you have it. Only a strong side is going to want to take that risk (or a very weak one, that needs to gamble on attunement). I guess with that argument, it's likely that the fourth known Arkentool is held by a fairly strong side as well.
valce wrote:fractal wrote:Also, if you attack another side to take their Arkentool, you have to be afraid that someone else will do the same to you after you have it. Only a strong side is going to want to take that risk (or a very weak one, that needs to gamble on attunement). I guess with that argument, it's likely that the fourth known Arkentool is held by a fairly strong side as well.
Just because it is known doesn't mean it is known to be owned by someone. The fourth Arkentool could have been lost some time ago, and may now be held by a small/obscure side that nobody can find, hidden by some side who just doesn't want it to fall into the wrong hands(perhaps Charlie?) or even by a barbarian (attuned or unattuned).
Fiendishrabbit wrote:It shouldn't be that hard to identify the guy on the top left. He's clearly wearing a pilot jacket over a hoodie. How common is that combo?


DoctorJest wrote:Or just lying in a cave somewhere. Perhaps a multi-level cave, with progressively harder monsters in it, the further down one goes.

Althernai wrote:GKBeetle wrote:People on this forum seem to think that Charlie is influencing pop rates of gobwins around Gobwin Knob. Is there any proof that Charlie is doing this. Was it in a text update that I missed? I remember an update saying that gobwins were no longer popping around Gobwin Knob, but I don't remember any update saying it was Charlie's doing. Am I missing something?
Yes:One thing he never volunteered in these meetings was that the bracer gave a 78% likelihood that there was something fishy going on with the lack of Gobwins and prevalence of Marbits.
And if there was, then there was a better than 92% chance that the agency behind it was Charlescomm.
It's not certain that it's Charlie, but it's significantly more likely than not (particularly since we, the readers, know that he has a tendency to manipulate natural allies whereas Parson does not know this and is probably not putting it into his calculations).

Angband wrote:Fiendishrabbit wrote:It shouldn't be that hard to identify the guy on the top left. He's clearly wearing a pilot jacket over a hoodie. How common is that combo?
Could it be MacGyver? I'm skeptical, the jaw/neck are a bit more slender in the drawing than in any photo I could find.
I would also think MacGyver would be some sort of Stuffamancer instead of a Thinkamancer.

DoctorJest wrote:Or just lying in a cave somewhere. Perhaps a multi-level cave, with progressively harder monsters in it, the further down one goes.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests