Controversial Topic

Your new games, homebrews, mods and ideas. Forum games go here.

Controversial Topic

Postby Kreistor » Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:26 pm

Long, rambling, and almost-but-not-quite interesting post about an oddly confusing possible game rule. Clearly provocative in a general manner, such that it will prompt response from someone non-specific, while seeming to be directly attacking particular individuals.
http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/TBFGK_1 Here you can find all comic pages written as text for convenient quoting.

http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/Erfworld_Mechanics The starting page for accessing all known Erfworld "rules".
User avatar
Kreistor
 
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:41 pm

Kreistor wrote:Long, rambling, and almost-but-not-quite interesting post about an oddly confusing possible game rule.


Intentionally antagonistic response, disparaging poster's intelligence and lineage, including point-by-point responses to every element of post.

Kreistor wrote: Clearly provocative in a general manner, such that it will prompt response from someone non-specific, while seeming to be directly attacking particular individuals.


Rambling tangent designed to confuse or muddle original information, and also to establish this author's imagined cleverness and insight.
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Cmdr I. Heartly Noah » Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:54 pm

Non sequiter.
I am a: Chaotic Neutral Human Bard/Sorcerer (2nd/1st Level)
Str- 12, Dex- 15, Con- 12, Int- 14, Wis- 11, Cha- 13
Cmdr I. Heartly Noah
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:24 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Doktor Jones » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:37 pm

Cmdr I. Heartly Noah wrote:Non sequiter.


Baseless flame about getting off topic.

Random tangent from main topic, leading to sub-discussion of another topic.
User avatar
Doktor Jones
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Cmdr I. Heartly Noah » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:31 pm

Over-angry response. Verbose statement of personal rights. Reference to one particular government's laws.

Statement of intent to leave and never return.
I am a: Chaotic Neutral Human Bard/Sorcerer (2nd/1st Level)
Str- 12, Dex- 15, Con- 12, Int- 14, Wis- 11, Cha- 13
Cmdr I. Heartly Noah
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:24 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Doktor Jones » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:55 pm

Cmdr I. Heartly Noah wrote:Over-angry response. Verbose statement of personal rights. Reference to one particular government's laws.


Bashing of specified government including accusations of rampant corruption or other faults. Generic sheep insult for following government blindly.

Cmdr I. Heartly Noah wrote:Statement of intent to leave and never return.


Ridicule, followed by proclamation of victory.
User avatar
Doktor Jones
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Kreistor » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:43 pm

Demand the thread has been hijacked and must return to original topic, despite no one ever posting about it. Includes claim of ownership of thread.
http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/TBFGK_1 Here you can find all comic pages written as text for convenient quoting.

http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/Erfworld_Mechanics The starting page for accessing all known Erfworld "rules".
User avatar
Kreistor
 
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Infidel » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:32 am

abbreviation that adds nothing to the topic but implies the thread will be terminated shortly.
User avatar
Infidel
I am a Tool!
I am a Tool!
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:22 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Cmdr I. Heartly Noah » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:59 am

Predictable return in direct contradiction of own statements.
I am a: Chaotic Neutral Human Bard/Sorcerer (2nd/1st Level)
Str- 12, Dex- 15, Con- 12, Int- 14, Wis- 11, Cha- 13
Cmdr I. Heartly Noah
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:24 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Doktor Jones » Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:53 am

Snide comments about previous poster being a troll, possibly accompanied by insults to previous poster's intelligence and/or social life.

More ranting about the controversial topic. Citations of sources that do not particularly prove any points mentioned, possibly including one or two that actually seem to refute the argument.
User avatar
Doktor Jones
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:34 am

Request for return to civility and politeness, in order to establish poster's moral superiority.

List of discussion points being used by both sides, phrased in such a way that poster's side appears more reasonable.
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Skyrar » Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:49 am

Non-informed drive-by posting concerned with size of own testicles, praising said organs and stating that there is no better future than tomorrow.
True Neutral Human Barbarian/Bard (2nd/1st Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength- 12
Dexterity- 11
Constitution- 10
Intelligence- 15
Wisdom- 14
Charisma- 13
Skyrar
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby jioan » Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:38 am

A short one or two sentence long post that shows little understanding of the subject and reveals that they didn't read the entire topic and only did this in order to raise their post count.
User avatar
jioan
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby SteveMB » Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:45 am

Exaggerated straw-man version of opposing argument. Rhetorical questioning of whether anyone could possibly take such notions seriously.
Is this a real holy war, or just a bunch of deluded boopholes croaking each other?
User avatar
SteveMB
Tool + YOTD + Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Tool + YOTD + Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:31 pm

SteveMB wrote:Exaggerated straw-man version of opposing argument. Rhetorical questioning of whether anyone could possibly take such notions seriously.

Vigorous agreement with above post, primarily to bump the topic and to appear relevant and clever.
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:32 pm

Immediate post to correct minor grammatical and spelling errors in previous post.
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Doktor Jones » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:43 pm

MarbitChow wrote:Immediate post to correct minor grammatical and spelling errors in previous post.


Lengthy diatribe about forum/internet etiquette.

Implication that poster's intellect is subpar for not being aware of and/or adhering to etiquette described above.
User avatar
Doktor Jones
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
Erfabet + Print 2 Draw 3 Supporter!
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby malekith » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:45 pm

MarbitChow wrote:...primarily to bump the topic...

Upon noticing the topic after the afore mentioned bump post:
A short to medium length post of about one, one and a half paragraphs trying to portray the authors own views both on the subject and politically.
tries to tie together the two sides of the argument to come to some appeasing and altogether new middle ground and failing quite spectacularly, including references to a few historical examples from real life or famous examples of the game rule in question but failing in analysing them at all well.

Ending remark obviously showing the author's attempt to read the whole topic and prove themselves clever about the topic but being apologetic if they've offended anyone - basically opening them up for an attack from following posters

Mal
malekith
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:45 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby MarbitChow » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:58 pm

malekith wrote:Ending remark obviously showing the author's attempt to read the whole topic and prove themselves clever about the topic but being apologetic if they've offended anyone - basically opening them up for an attack from following posters

Immediate and vehement attack on poster.
User avatar
MarbitChow
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Controversial Topic

Postby Kreistor » Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:31 pm

Obvious gloat that people seem to be enjoying the thread topic.
http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/TBFGK_1 Here you can find all comic pages written as text for convenient quoting.

http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/Erfworld_Mechanics The starting page for accessing all known Erfworld "rules".
User avatar
Kreistor
 
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada

Next

Return to Your Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bahamut, BrimStone, LTDave and 3 guests