


BLANDCorporatio wrote:Isaac ... Isaac ... action and reaction ... who could he possibly be a reference to I wonder ...![]()
Nice. So we have three MK-related updates about how Parson will be allowed passage by a conspiracy of GMWTA.
It's almost ... too easy. Never trust conspiracies I say- there'll be a surprise for our favourite CWL.
PS: I'm guessing the merry-go-round is the Caster Accelerator? Or are the bumper cars the Caster Collider?
BLANDCorporatio wrote:DoctorJest wrote:"Wolves are like dogs, but dogs are like dogs, so therefore: kittens".
DoctorJest, if I weren't referentially married to my sig I'd use that instead.

Trotsky wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote:Isaac ... Isaac ... action and reaction ... who could he possibly be a reference to I wonder ...![]()
Clearly Isaac Asimov.


niklinna wrote:Trotsky wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote:Isaac ... Isaac ... action and reaction ... who could he possibly be a reference to I wonder ...![]()
Clearly Isaac Asimov.
Uh...perhaps partially (since Rob likes to layer and compound his puns), but likely not primarily.
BLANDCorporatio wrote:DoctorJest wrote:"Wolves are like dogs, but dogs are like dogs, so therefore: kittens".
DoctorJest, if I weren't referentially married to my sig I'd use that instead.


Trotsky wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote:Isaac ... Isaac ... action and reaction ... who could he possibly be a reference to I wonder ...![]()
Nice. So we have three MK-related updates about how Parson will be allowed passage by a conspiracy of GMWTA.
It's almost ... too easy. Never trust conspiracies I say- there'll be a surprise for our favourite CWL.
PS: I'm guessing the merry-go-round is the Caster Accelerator? Or are the bumper cars the Caster Collider?
Clearly Isaac Asimov. Of course, after this page I think we need an Actions board to go with the Reactions one. On it you have to argue the side you don't believe in on whatever topic is currently being over-debated in circles.


Trotsky wrote:niklinna wrote:Trotsky wrote:Uh...perhaps partially (since Rob likes to layer and compound his puns), but likely not primarily.
I was joking. In retrospect I should have added an emoticon in order to emote my intentions through icons. In fact, I will go back and edit one and claim it was always there so you will look foolish. HA, how about that!


coyo wrote:Trotsky wrote:BLANDCorporatio wrote:Isaac ... Isaac ... action and reaction ... who could he possibly be a reference to I wonder ...![]()
Nice. So we have three MK-related updates about how Parson will be allowed passage by a conspiracy of GMWTA.
It's almost ... too easy. Never trust conspiracies I say- there'll be a surprise for our favourite CWL.
PS: I'm guessing the merry-go-round is the Caster Accelerator? Or are the bumper cars the Caster Collider?
Clearly Isaac Asimov. Of course, after this page I think we need an Actions board to go with the Reactions one. On it you have to argue the side you don't believe in on whatever topic is currently being over-debated in circles.
Not Newton? Ah figgs.


Joe Falco wrote:What's sad is the serious looks on the thinkamancers' faces when "operating" the devices.







Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Lilwik, ManaCaster, mroozee and 5 guests