justamessenger wrote:teratorn wrote:Althernai wrote:Bogroll took out Ansom and we know the twoll was much lower level because he leveled twice just from that single act. I think they're pretty safe from low level units in ordinary situations, but we've seen plenty of things that can take croak, capture or incapacitate them -- special items, large mounts, casters, siege -- so they're hardly safe.
Yes, but Ansom probably lost most of his hitpoints from the fall and not from damage from Bogroll.
Mr. Owl, how many licks does it take for a twoll to kill a high level Warlord?
A one, a twohoooo, a three...thud...a three...
The world may never know. (Whether it was Bogroll's attacks, the fall, or [most likely] a combination of the two)
Oberon wrote:Three falls, and none fatal. HAX!GaryThunder wrote:Ansom falls a lot, doesn't he. Fell onto the wall, fell when Bogroll knocked him off his carpet, fell when Ossomer knocked him off his carpet.
True enough. But the fourth fall? He didn't live through that one.BLANDCorporatio wrote:Oberon wrote:Three falls, and none fatal. HAX!GaryThunder wrote:Ansom falls a lot, doesn't he. Fell onto the wall, fell when Bogroll knocked him off his carpet, fell when Ossomer knocked him off his carpet.
Ansom must have pre-rolled all 1s out of the cosmic dice.
Zeroberon wrote:So we know with 100% certainty that THIS IS HOW TRI-LINKS WORK, PERIOD END OF STORY.
gatherer818 wrote:Since no one responded to my mention of Royals possibly being homophobic in addition to all their other prejudices that non-Royals seem to have many fewer of, I would like to re-ignite the HomoTram war by pointing out that while Charlie was talking to Tram, Charlie's avatar ONLY assumed forms with Rainbow colors, and Tram had a psychedelic rainbow t-shirt as well. It seems less like hinting and more like broadcasting at that point.
I'm doing a whole-comic-every-book reread right now (sorely wishing I could get the physical copy, which will have gone up in price by the time I can afford it), which is how I noticed it. I'm now more convinced of my theory that Royals are simply prejudiced. Against nearly everything that doesn't perfect match them. Unless they're trend-buckers themselves - Tram and Jillian are the only two I can think of right now that are "Royal but don't act like it", and they're both homosexual or bisexual, whilst every other Royal (and I THINK every Noble) we've met is heterosexual. Don seems less affected by prejudices than Slately (but also acts somewhat less "royal" as well - maybe the degree that Royalty matters also determines the extent of the prejudice?), but neither seemed to really care for Jillian. Slately obviously thought his son was less of a person for being "different".
Ansan Gotti wrote:I cannot understand people who are arguing that Tramennis is not gay, however. Everything we've seen absolutely screams that he is. I doubt Rob is intending this point to be ambiguous, or in any way a close call.
Chit Rule Railroad wrote:Ansan Gotti wrote:I cannot understand people who are arguing that Tramennis is not gay, however. Everything we've seen absolutely screams that he is. I doubt Rob is intending this point to be ambiguous, or in any way a close call.
What has been depicted so far is a femme Trammenis developing a crush on the butch Jillian - a gender-bending but heterosexual situation.
And as to this, why all the hate for sofa king? I don't think he has ever even actually appeared in the comic so it is a bit hard to judge who he hates and doesn't hate.
drachefly wrote:I would guess it's just an 'I would not be surprised' because he's a royal we haven't met, and it would fit the theory.
reignofevil wrote:Well you see, other than some hippy rainbows and a generally upbeat personality, I have yet to see tram actually, you know, show interest in a guy. He seems more worried about his job right now to be honest, and so it is kind of hard to judge either way.
drachefly wrote:It seems to me that Don was not being ironic. Don was never the one that had a problem with Tram.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], TomFoolery and 4 guests