
Azukar wrote:So... Wanda and Olive on the same side.
How did this happen?

Azukar wrote:So... Wanda and Olive on the same side.
How did this happen?
querzis wrote:After her side was destroyed Wanda was captured easely by Haffaton, theres really no surprise there.
But now with this update that show us how big Haffaton is, its seems obvious that they cant still exist. A side that big would be a major concern in the main story. I cant wait to see how they fall and I'm quite sure Wanda had something to do with it.


Whispri wrote:If Clay cursed her as ordered, likely so, but... if he boosted her instead as some suspect, then with her bonus, Tommy's bonus, a powerful stack of Uncroaked and full juice? 'Easy' isn't the word I'd look for.



ftl wrote:No, it IS easy. I bet Olive would even find a way to make it happen with no units croaked on either side.


kevistrophic wrote:I think we'll find out pretty soon how that happened.
It's interesting that we've seen a glimpse of the upper limit for the economically sustainable size of a side. Of course, the fact that there is one speaks to the "design goals" that govern the creation of Erfworld. Apparently no side is meant to ever conquer the whole world without flat out breaking the game if 40 or 50 cities is an "absurd" size that begs to be split up. What that means to me is that either victory conditions are more complicated than total conquest and subjugation like in Risk, or Erfworld has no victory conditions; it's not really a game at all.
oslecamo2_temp wrote:More interestingly, sides can be subjugated, with the previous leader becoming simply another unit. Wanda got to be queen for a day.
onlyme wrote:oslecamo2_temp wrote:More interestingly, sides can be subjugated, with the previous leader becoming simply another unit. Wanda got to be queen for a day.
She was only ruler for a few seconds (and I think we are quite sure it was not queen as not being royal).
When everything but her stack vanished, she was no longer overlord, so there no longer was any side.
So no side was subjungated here.
"Come!" said Chris again, with a friendly beckon. "We have good chocolate, and tea. You look like a tea drinker. And we have...other things as well."
oslecamo2_temp wrote:onlyme wrote:oslecamo2_temp wrote:More interestingly, sides can be subjugated, with the previous leader becoming simply another unit. Wanda got to be queen for a day.
She was only ruler for a few seconds (and I think we are quite sure it was not queen as not being royal).
When everything but her stack vanished, she was no longer overlord, so there no longer was any side.
So no side was subjungated here.
Go read the rest of the webcomic. You may notice how Jillian was a side of her own for quite some time, she just didn't control any territorry. Wanda may've had just a stack, but she was still the ruler of that stack, just like Jillian was the queen of her flying mercenary warband.
gobe wrote:oslecamo2_temp wrote:onlyme wrote:She was only ruler for a few seconds (and I think we are quite sure it was not queen as not being royal).
When everything but her stack vanished, she was no longer overlord, so there no longer was any side.
So no side was subjungated here.
Go read the rest of the webcomic. You may notice how Jillian was a side of her own for quite some time, she just didn't control any territorry. Wanda may've had just a stack, but she was still the ruler of that stack, just like Jillian was the queen of her flying mercenary warband.
Go read the webcomic!? You should probably change your tone, especially when you're wrong.
Jillian was a barbarian commander and royal heir to a lost side -- a side that existed no more. She only became queen when she had a Side again. A side requires a capital city (or maybe just a city, I don't know), otherwise you are a barbarian commander, which is different from being ruler (you have no territory to rule). Wanda stopped being an overlord the moment the city fell, which is a few seconds later, as pointed out by the person you just senselessly insulted.
kevistrophic wrote:I think we'll find out pretty soon how that happened.
It's interesting that we've seen a glimpse of the upper limit for the economically sustainable size of a side. Of course, the fact that there is one speaks to the "design goals" that govern the creation of Erfworld. Apparently no side is meant to ever conquer the whole world without flat out breaking the game if 40 or 50 cities is an "absurd" size that begs to be split up. What that means to me is that either victory conditions are more complicated than total conquest and subjugation like in Risk, or Erfworld has no victory conditions; it's not really a game at all.
Knight13 wrote:Precisely. Barbarians are not the same thing as sides, they are units without a side. You need to be a heir in order to keep existing after your side falls, like Jillian was, but that doesn't mean your side continues existing without any territory. Until Jillian reclaimed the ruins of Faq, she was not a Faq unit, Faq didn't exist anymore, she was a barbarian unit with no side. In fact, the new Faq isn't even the same side as the old Faq, it's an entirely new side that just happens to have the same name and occupy the same territory. It may even be possible for other barbarian units to join or leave a barbarian group, just like real life mercenary bands. They just stick together because it's easier to gain the schmuckers they need to keep existing as a group.
oslecamo2_temp wrote:That's because, altough a barbarian, she was still a side with her own wallet, upkeeps and the ability to decide where to go and to command her remaining forces.
Hint: Jillian never stoped being a queen. She just choose to kept her royal status hidden.

Users browsing this forum: Lilwik, LordAcme, Swodaems and 15 guests