kravechocolate wrote:First post ever!
Plants vs Zombies, I love it! Be careful of the booby-trapped lawn-mower!

Nimelennar wrote:kravechocolate wrote:First post ever!
Plants vs Zombies, I love it! Be careful of the booby-trapped lawn-mower!
Aren't the plants and the zombies on the same side here though?

Zeku wrote:A level 2 city can be razed for over 9000 shmuckers!

Zeku wrote:This episode is cute and appropriate but does not actually make any sense!
Unless it does, which means that what we are seeing here are actual shenanigans!

Whispri wrote:In the extremely unlikely event that Jillian's assessment of Haffaton is accurate, what reason is there to attack them? Non-evil reasons I mean.


Whispri wrote:In the extremely unlikely event that Jillian's assessment of Haffaton is accurate, what reason is there to attack them? Non-evil reasons I mean.
As for the battle, she's far too confident, this is just the first line of defence, the second row of plants alone,



Whispri wrote:In the extremely unlikely event that Jillian's assessment of Haffaton is accurate, what reason is there to attack them? Non-evil reasons I mean.
As for the battle, she's far too confident, this is just the first line of defence, the second row of plants alone, well with plants vs zombies as the inspiration...
In all honesty I wouldn't be surprised if Haffaton are taking bets on how far Jillian and her cronies get.Nimelennar wrote:kravechocolate wrote:First post ever!
Plants vs Zombies, I love it! Be careful of the booby-trapped lawn-mower!
Aren't the plants and the zombies on the same side here though?
Not if they've just interrupted a wargame of some sort.



Whispri wrote:That Haffaton banner... the similarities betwen it and the livery future era Wanda uses... Well it's short of her actively still fighting in Haffaton colours, but it's pretty boopin' close. In fact, if it wasn't for future era Wanda having to use Stanley's banner, I'm not sure there'd be a difference.
cheeseaholic wrote:1D6 is laughable? Bogroll had 12 hits, and he was a heavy, which looks to be a large increase.. I'm thinking that defence soaks.
And it looks like Combat isn't damage, and damage isn't shown by the 3D glasses.


Whispri wrote:In the extremely unlikely event that Jillian's assessment of Haffaton is accurate, what reason is there to attack them? Non-evil reasons I mean.
ftl wrote:This could be how Haffaton maintains all these cities. The plants are hippiemancy constructs, the zombies are croakamancy - none of that takes any upkeep, perhaps.
They're weak defenses, sure, but this means Haffaton HAS defenses in every city! For free! While they're no match for Jillian's WRECD force, she's sort of a special case, and the defenses are probably strong enough to hold out against random barbarians or minor incursion groups.

Whispri wrote:That Haffaton banner... the similarities betwen it and the livery future era Wanda uses... Well it's short of her actively still fighting in Haffaton colours, but it's pretty boopin' close. In fact, if it wasn't for future era Wanda having to use Stanley's banner, I'm not sure there'd be a difference.
cheeseaholic wrote:1D6 is laughable? Bogroll had 12 hits, and he was a heavy, which looks to be a large increase.. I'm thinking that defence soaks.
And it looks like Combat isn't damage, and damage isn't shown by the 3D glasses.


Nnelg wrote:Alea Iacta Est.
What's most interesting about that phrase, in my opinion, is that Cesar actually said it in Greek.
Users browsing this forum: Swodaems and 7 guests