Whispri wrote:There may well be meta reasons involved, but nevertheless, there must be in-Universe reasons for the silence. Wanda's reputation is particularly relevant to the matters staring the Jetstone in the face, i.e. Wanda and her army.
Whispri wrote:Two problems with that, firstly surrounding Faq means occupying at least part of the territory controlled by future era Gobwin Knob, including certain Volcanoe lair. This alone puts Haffaton very close to Jetstone.
0beron wrote:Well just because Retconjuration is out of the reach of erfworlders doesn't mean it couldn't be the source of a "backlash" for a caster improperly tampering with Signamancy.
drachefly wrote:On the other hand, Charlie isn't the name of a major tool company either.
0beron wrote:Not neccessarily. The 'Tool, as a work of the Titans, would obviously be immune to the Retconning of Haffaton, so it would survive and remain somewhere.
Because the only way Erflings would know WHAT it does is from experience of Haffaton, they lost that knowledge of it when Haffaton is Retconned. But because the 'Tools are so important to Erfworld as a whole, Erflings would have knowledge of it's existence from sources other than Haffaton.
This way, Erflings are left with knowledge of the fact that a 4th 'Tool exists...but no idea of what it is or does.
0beron wrote:No, it could be universally known simply that there are 4 'Tools. This may be in the "religious texts" that pop in city libraries, or ingrained knowledge in all units, and this knowledge would have nothing to do with anyone witnessing a 'Tool being used.
As for the lack of inquisitiveness about it, this could be unrelated to the Retconjuration. An artifact keyed to Signamancy could conceal it's purpose by changing it's appearance, or somehow "discourage" inquiry about it. Signamancy has been rather broadly defined as essentially governing the idea of "form = function". If you make your form something that should be ignored...you are ignored.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest