




Housellama wrote:Aside. Am I the only one who thinks Maggie is a little bit hot? Be honest people.
Ilari wrote:So Stanley and Wanda summoned Parson to save their side, Janis and Marie summoned him to end war, and the Thinkamancers summoned him to defeat Charlie. Just how many causes is he expected to champion?
Beeskee wrote:I was reluctant to assume Charlie was the Wizard, since it seems like if a butterfly farts in an unmapped hex, we're all ready to assume it's somehow part of Charlie's grand schemes to control the wind or whatever.

Lamech wrote:The dish doesn't let Charlie fight the whole world. The whole world gathered together would almost certainly put an end to him.
Lamech wrote:[Charlie] can't watch everything.

bladestorm wrote:Seems I am buying in to the theory of Maggie either being Charlie or aligned with Charlie somehow.

bladestorm wrote: Also, IIRC, Maggie was tied up in the trimancer link, so she would have been unaware of Wanda getting the scroll and summoning Parson. The link gets broken, she shunts the damage (killing Misty and Mindwarping Jack in the process), and recovers to find this stupidworlder... who then goes on to nuking every single witness to the end of the first RCC, except Parson and his casters. Where did Charlie get that intel? Still mindreading his decrypted Archons?
Housellama wrote:Aside. Am I the only one who thinks Maggie is a little bit hot? Be honest people.

bladestorm wrote:
Also, IIRC, Maggie was tied up in the trimancer link, so she would have been unaware of Wanda getting the scroll and summoning Parson. The link gets broken, she shunts the damage (killing Misty and Mindwarping Jack in the process), and recovers to find this stupidworlder... who then goes on to nuking every single witness to the end of the first RCC, except Parson and his casters. Where did Charlie get that intel? Still mindreading his decrypted Archons?
teratorn wrote:bladestorm wrote:Seems I am buying in to the theory of Maggie either being Charlie or aligned with Charlie somehow.
It seems I also was transported into another world, one where common sense doesn't exist.
Eliezer Yudkowski wrote:There are possible minds in mind design space who have anti-Occamian and anti-Laplacian priors; they believe that simpler theories are less likely to be correct, and that the more often something happens, the less likely it is to happen again.
And when you ask these strange beings why they keep using priors that never seem to work in real life... they reply, "Because it's never worked for us before!"
Now, one lesson you might derive from this, is "Don't be born with a stupid prior." This is an amazingly helpful principle on many real-world problems, but I doubt it will satisfy philosophers.

teratorn wrote:It seems I also was transported into another world, one where common sense doesn't exist.

drachefly wrote:But in this case it's nothing to do with the prior, it's about the response to evidence.


Users browsing this forum: Aquillion, dwp222, Mizzle and 8 guests