


Sixty wrote:Obviously the mystery caster has no particular feelings one way or the other about Parson, he simply heard "cue the Benny Hill music" and gave chase, compelled to do so by forces outside his control.



donm61873 wrote:No one else surprised by the non-booping door description by Parson in the last panel?
Sixty wrote:Obviously the mystery caster has no particular feelings one way or the other about Parson, he simply heard "cue the Benny Hill music" and gave chase, compelled to do so by forces outside his control.


TheMutant wrote:donm61873 wrote:No one else surprised by the non-booping door description by Parson in the last panel?
Not by this point. Parson's shown no booping since the start of Book 2, to my knowledge- certainly he's sworn several times. It's a generally accepted fact that he 'broke' his personal censor at the end of Book 1.

Its only holding the idiot ball if its out of character. This isn't out of character for Parson, its part of his character development. He needs to have a plan that revolves around him being in battle important. There is no good plan that does that. Hence he can't find a good one.Beeskee wrote:Is it still 'holding the idiot ball' if Parson KNOWS he's holding the idiot ball, and this whole thing was a bad move?
Not that he had a lot of time to think about it anyway. It's been months for us, but he's only been in the magic kingdom for what, 10, 15 minutes tops? All while the situation changed?
I guess Rob was tired of the complaining about Parson, too. Or he planned this all along.![]()
TheMutant wrote:Bunny actually gets spelled-out dialogue for the first time! With a strange text bubble effect! And a cutaway shot of Charlescomm!
Let the speculation commence. o_o *drums fingers*
Lamech wrote:Its only holding the idiot ball if its out of character. This isn't out of character for Parson, its part of his character development. He needs to have a plan that revolves around him being in battle important. There is no good plan that does that. Hence he can't find a good one.
Lamech wrote:She thinkagramming. Hence the cutaway to charlie. He can hear her.

Whispri wrote:Yup, Sylvia would have been the better choice, she and Wanda would have lovingly carried out any plan he gave them. If they'd made it Ossomer he might not have turned.
Bladestorm wrote:But, now that Wanda is in the MK and Ossomer is croaked (again), Sylvia is an obvious options. She would most vigourously carry out Parson's commands. But that brings up questions about how well a decrypted could serve as CWL, or if there is some mechanic preventing that (such as Loyalty to Wanda clashing with Duty towards Side). Archer is another option, being that ranged combatant leaders tend to be more tactically driven and lead from the back, where their range can be used more effectively and they can call shot. Hand-to-hand leaders tend to lead from the front, and lead by example.
Beeskee wrote:Lamech wrote:Its only holding the idiot ball if its out of character. This isn't out of character for Parson, its part of his character development. He needs to have a plan that revolves around him being in battle important. There is no good plan that does that. Hence he can't find a good one.
I think it is a good idea in the sense that Parson will be able to actually know what is going on, rather than second hand reports, where important details such as "we decided to try to knock the tower down" will be more readily available to him. Once he's there, I get the feeling that he's going to come up with an incredibly clever plan. Or get captured. Either way. But right now, he can't form a plan because he has no idea what is going on.


bladestorm wrote:1.) Hippiemancers and predictamancers-- to end war on Erfworld
2.) Thinkamancers -- to bring down Charlie
3.) Collect the Arkentools together
4.) A new mandate of a balance between Arkentools and Royalty, rather than one assuming they have mandate to rule over the other.
or 5.) Maggie for some hot Hamster-style loving.
bladestorm wrote:or 5.) Maggie for some hot Hamster-style loving.



Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests