mortissimus wrote:My guess is that popped Commanders in the Capital are Children (the known examples fit this) and thus Royal if the ruler is Royal, and that Commanders popped in other cities are not Children and thus Noble if the ruler is Royal or Noble.
0beron wrote:vintermann wrote:- Private Idaho, urban dictionary explains it's an expression related to a 1980 dance song of some sort.
The Dune series written by Frank Herbert features a supporting character named Duncan Idaho, who is killed during a war and later "regrown" using genetic technology and implanted with hypnotic triggers to turn him into an enemy against the noble house he formerly served. Seems like a fair analogy to uncroaking (and foreshadowing to Decryption).
splintermute wrote:I think it's a reference to the Keanu Reeves movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102494/
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.


0beron wrote:splintermute wrote:I think it's a reference to the Keanu Reeves movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102494/
And since when has Rob limited himself to referencing ONLY one thing at a time? It could be both lol.
bladestorm wrote:0beron wrote:splintermute wrote:I think it's a reference to the Keanu Reeves movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102494/
And since when has Rob limited himself to referencing ONLY one thing at a time? It could be both lol.
A lot of times, there is a three way reference. Layer the pop cult on thick.
Kreistor wrote:I know that it is a popular opinion that non-Royal sides can pop nobles, but there is no text that suggests this.
Yeah, but that's a 1991 movie. The B-52's song is the ur reference.derfy wrote:Private Idaho = http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102494/
Plot?oslecamo2_temp wrote:So, anyone mind explaining me how subordinate units starting to refuse orders and mess up their combat formations out of personal envy and lover's quarrels doesn't qualify for "auto-disband if you try to go against your side"?
We all float down here.0beron wrote:Same way Transylvito vampires fly, they just float.
Nah. Wanda is Wanda, and it is the entire Wanda that Jillian falls in love with. I've known some dom/sub pairs, and it's not all harshness and "kinky insane torturer" 24x7. I'm not sure many people could find love in such a situation.Beeskee wrote:I think we are seeing more of the side of Wanda that Jillian fell in love with, rather than the "kinky insane torturer" Wanda.
Hmmmm, close. Sun Tzu was challenged (don't recall if it was by the Emperor or by a jealous general or something. Perhaps it was in response to a boast Sun Tzu made) to teach the concubines in military formations. They lined up, and Sun Tzu gave them orders, and they fell into a fit of giggling. So he said something like "When the general gives an order, and it is not understood, it is the responsibility of the general." And he repeated the orders, upon which the concubines fell into another fit of giggling. Then Sun Tzu said "When the general gives an order, and it is not understood, it is the responsibility of the general. But if the general explains the order, and it is still not understood and followed, it is the responsibility of the troops." And then he ordered the execution.Tesslyn wrote:Though it ties with Sun Tzu supposedly telling a King/Emperor that he would -not- halt an execution (of his concubines no less) because it was up to a 'general' to decide 'military' strategy once the Ruler had given the initial orders.
Zeroberon wrote:So we know with 100% certainty that THIS IS HOW TRI-LINKS WORK, PERIOD END OF STORY.

bladestorm wrote:Have we any evidence for or against a non-Royal CWL having a noble as a warlord?
Oberon wrote:Sun Tzu was challenged (don't recall if it was by the Emperor or by a jealous general or something. Perhaps it was in response to a boast Sun Tzu made) to teach the concubines in military formations. They lined up, and Sun Tzu gave them orders, and they fell into a fit of giggling. So he said something like "When the general gives an order, and it is not understood, it is the responsibility of the general." And he repeated the orders, upon which the concubines fell into another fit of giggling. Then Sun Tzu said "When the general gives an order, and it is not understood, it is the responsibility of the general. But if the general explains the order, and it is still not understood and followed, it is the responsibility of the troops." And then he ordered the execution.

One of the more well-known stories about Sun Tzu, taken from Shiji, illustrates Sun Tzu's temperament as follows: Before hiring Sun Tzu, the King of Wu tested Sun Tzu's skills by commanding him to train a harem of 180 concubines into soldiers. Sun Tzu divided them into two companies, appointing the two concubines most favored by the king as the company commanders. When Sun Tzu first ordered the concubines to face right, they giggled. In response, Sun Tzu said that the general, in this case himself, was responsible for ensuring that soldiers understood the commands given to them. Then, he reiterated the command, and again the concubines giggled. Sun Tzu then ordered the execution of the king's two favored concubines, to the king's protests. He explained that if the general's soldiers understood their commands but did not obey, it was the fault of the officers. Sun Tzu also said that, once a general was appointed, it was his duty to carry out his mission, even if the king protested. After both concubines were killed, new officers were chosen to replace them. Afterwards, both companies performed their maneuvers flawlessly.[6]


I'll never claim that my memory is perfect. But the citation mortissimus provided shows that I wasn't terribly off the mark, and I was a bit closer than Tesslyn's recollection of the story.drachefly wrote:That is not quite how I remember that story going.
Zeroberon wrote:So we know with 100% certainty that THIS IS HOW TRI-LINKS WORK, PERIOD END OF STORY.
Users browsing this forum: ysath and 6 guests