DivineDragoonKain wrote:Is there any reason you're all taking Janis's little lie about Parson at face value, or did Rob drop a hint that Parson was, in fact a Hippymancer?
If you're just relying on Janis's word here, I think it's pretty obvious she was fibbing to get the other casters off of Parson's back, and he was able to move through the portal because he's Parson (simply, not bound to Erfworld's rules 100% of the time).

balder wrote:New one is up, with AWSOM guest artist Onezumi, of Stupid and Insane Defenders Against Chaos.
SteveMB wrote:Graydon wrote:Ambug666 wrote:Didn't Parson leave the city when he went to the magic realm?
The mechanism was a magic portal; presumably, this does not involve Move.
It almost can't involve Move
No "almost" about it -- we saw a one-shot (i.e. from some other side) caster use a portal during Gobwin Knob's turn.
DivineDragoonKain wrote:Question, guys:
Is there any reason you're all taking Janis's little lie about Parson at face value, or did Rob drop a hint that Parson was, in fact a Hippymancer?
If you're just relying on Janis's word here, I think it's pretty obvious she was fibbing to get the other casters off of Parson's back, and he was able to move through the portal because he's Parson (simply, not bound to Erfworld's rules 100% of the time).
Gez wrote:balder wrote:New one is up, with AWSOM guest artist Onezumi, of Stupid and Insane Defenders Against Chaos.
If that's what Onezumi could draw, what about two zumis linked?


DivineDragoonKain wrote:Question, guys:
Is there any reason you're all taking Janis's little lie about Parson at face value, or did Rob drop a hint that Parson was, in fact a Hippymancer?
If you're just relying on Janis's word here, I think it's pretty obvious she was fibbing to get the other casters off of Parson's back, and he was able to move through the portal because he's Parson (simply, not bound to Erfworld's rules 100% of the time).
kunsttyv wrote:Is this certain? Can you show me an example of this? (bear in mind that it is stated that captives share turn with their captors, and allies all use the turn of the "last" member)
dholm wrote:kunsttyv wrote:Is this certain? Can you show me an example of this? (bear in mind that it is stated that captives share turn with their captors, and allies all use the turn of the "last" member)
It is certain, if for no other reason than that we haven't been forced to endure the turns of every other side in Erfworld. If they were after one another, a single day would take ages.

dholm wrote:If that's the case, why say he's a Hippiemancer? Why not just agree he's a Mathamancer? He at least has his calculator watch to back him up there.


Spot wrote:OneHugeTuck wrote:If I win the 325Million lotto tomorrow night (and I will) I'm going to be a Medici-style patron.
You're going to poison people?



Graydon wrote:SteveMB wrote:No "almost" about it -- we saw a one-shot (i.e. from some other side) caster use a portal during Gobwin Knob's turn.
Not, alas, definitive; turn order is not pan-Erf, it's for the parties to a conflict. (Turn position for a side is apparently innate, but we don't see "let's wait for the eighty-three sides between Jetstone and Gobwin Knob to move", either.) So a party to some other conflict, or a party not involved in any conflict, isn't stuck in the same turn sequence as the folks in conflict with Gobwin Knob were.


SteveMB wrote:Somebody pointed out a more ironclad argument -- Maggie, Sizemore, Wanda, and Parson used the portal when it was most definitely not GK's turn (it was the RCC's turn, and the two were directly engaged), and then made the return trip before GK's turn began the next day.Graydon wrote:Not, alas, definitive; turn order is not pan-Erf, it's for the parties to a conflict. (Turn position for a side is apparently innate, but we don't see "let's wait for the eighty-three sides between Jetstone and Gobwin Knob to move", either.) So a party to some other conflict, or a party not involved in any conflict, isn't stuck in the same turn sequence as the folks in conflict with Gobwin Knob were.



It's moot at the point, but there is a world of difference between Parson being shown to be winded after climbing some stairs because he is fat and out of shape and concluding that he doesn't follow the normal movement rules. Unless he actually couldn't get somewhere within the city because he was tired, there is no impact demonstrated for being shown to be tired, and thus no conclusion which can be drawn about Parson and movement rules.DevilDan wrote:Not to belabor the point, but we know that he does get tired and thus doesn't quite follow normal movement rules.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests