cheeseaholic wrote:StClair wrote:Consider this paradox, then: if Parson ends the dominion of Fate over the world by breaking it, that is an action - the last action - that was Fated to happen. Fate brings about its own end.
Firstly that isn't a paradox, secondly even if Parson destroys fate that doesn't mean that he was fated to do so, and thirdly Erfworld's fate may not affect Parson.
StClair wrote:2. Don't all the portents already point that way?
StClair wrote:3. Ah, here's the paradox: he's the only one who can, because he's from outside and not subject to Fate. And yet, the actions of everyone else - bringing him here, putting him in the right place at the right time to actually do it - may well be Fated.Which would make that moment, and that choice, the one that cannot be foreseen or seen beyond (as in the Matrix trilogy).
I don't know if that's true or not. We'll find out.
Magothys wrote:My memory is foggy; did Faq have a turnamancer? If they didn't, I see a possible grammar mistake in the update.1. Immediately hire a Turnamancer from the Magic Kingdom. Use them to accelerate production for six turns.
Whispri wrote:Visible, well any Warlord or scout they fly over will have dozens of chances to pierce the veil, if not hundreds.
Whispri wrote:effataigus wrote:As a card carrying member of the "Charlie behind every bush" club, I approve of this speculation. Flying units appearing as if from nowhere in a capital strike sounds like his MO to me. I'm just curious, if he was there, whether he was getting paid to be.
What would he gain from such an attack? When has he ever done so? Did he even exist back then?
Now Faq? Their whole thing is secretive airstrikes and they have a motive, the same motive behind Gillian's unprovoked attacks on Haffaton. The Lady Wanda Firebaugh, the girl destined to end them, was of Goodminton. If you're planning to fight Fate, destroying Goodminton woulld be the obvious way to do so.
Sure beats "him/her."splexis wrote:They. [ singular ] used to refer to a person of unspecified sex: ask someone if they could help.
Them. [ singular ] referring to a person of unspecified sex: how well do you have to know someone before you call them a friend?


technojunkie wrote:On a more intelligent note... Assuming Jillian does contact wanda; Who want's to bet the note says "easy way or hard way?"


Arky wrote:It's strange, obviously. All we know is that FAQ did not end up with a city outside of its bubble, let alone moving capitals to the site of Haffaton, and yet it did acquire Wanda. That would suggest that the decapitation strike succeeds (quite possibly with the help of Wanda the Betrayer) but that they chose to sack Haffaton instead of seizing it - perhaps in the belief that with the Haffaton threat ended, FAQ was no long at risk? Or due to another prediction by Marie that if they didn't move the capital, Queen Jillian would rule FAQ in 500 turns' time or something like that which conveniently misleads the FAQians....
Thoke wrote:I suspect that the unforeseen force that destroyed Goodminton might have some importance later on... Maybe it's an another trick Haffaton has up on it's sleeves, it could even be the reason why Haffaton is so successfull, if that force really is good to hide and sack unsuspecting enemy cities. Or it may be Charlie, or an Arkentool at work... Or something else.
I wonder what Wanda will think when she hears about (Jillian) razing Goodminton the City. If that had any sentimental value to her.

MonteCristo wrote:Well the most likely option was that the flying forces came from Goodminton's former allies who had joined up with haffaton after... Wanda's garden is enough to let us suspect that at least frenemy, if not both sides were ended by haffaton. However the point about the tannenbaums sneaking up on the city is a bit more perplexing as that might have required foolamancy. Archon's could help there, though this could also mean that haffaton itself has a foolamancer.
MonteCristo wrote:Y'know, i kinda wish that Rob had not told us this was good mitten right from the get go, and instead avoided giving us the cities name until after this part where Jillian finds out that this was Wanda's city. Might have made the surprise that jillian had stumbled across goodminton a bit more potent.Arky wrote:It's strange, obviously. All we know is that FAQ did not end up with a city outside of its bubble, let alone moving capitals to the site of Haffaton, and yet it did acquire Wanda. That would suggest that the decapitation strike succeeds (quite possibly with the help of Wanda the Betrayer) but that they chose to sack Haffaton instead of seizing it - perhaps in the belief that with the Haffaton threat ended, FAQ was no long at risk? Or due to another prediction by Marie that if they didn't move the capital, Queen Jillian would rule FAQ in 500 turns' time or something like that which conveniently misleads the FAQians....
Its not really strange. When Jillian first came up with the idea of a decapitation strike it was one of the possible outcomes. Either they would take many of haffaton's cities and become a large powerful side, or they would raze haffaton's cities too provide a huge boost to the treasury and go back to their little bubble. When it comes down to it, before the expansionist haffaton came along, Faq was doing fairly well in its bubble.
0beron wrote:I have no idea why people are so pissed off at Delphi and calling her crap. She made a perfect prediction! It doesn't hinge on every other side being inept, it hinges on PREDICTAMANCY. Are you all ignoring the crucial nature of that element? She doesn't have to "bet" on certain things happening, she KNOWS they'll happen.

effataigus wrote:Thoke wrote:I suspect that the unforeseen force that destroyed Goodminton might have some importance later on... Maybe it's an another trick Haffaton has up on it's sleeves, it could even be the reason why Haffaton is so successfull, if that force really is good to hide and sack unsuspecting enemy cities. Or it may be Charlie, or an Arkentool at work... Or something else.
I wonder what Wanda will think when she hears about (Jillian) razing Goodminton the City. If that had any sentimental value to her.
As a card carrying member of the "Charlie behind every bush" club, I approve of this speculation. Flying units appearing as if from nowhere in a capital strike sounds like his MO to me. I'm just curious, if he was there, whether he was getting paid to be.
MonteCristo wrote:Well the most likely option was that the flying forces came from Goodminton's former allies who had joined up with haffaton after... Wanda's garden is enough to let us suspect that at least frenemy, if not both sides were ended by haffaton. However the point about the tannenbaums sneaking up on the city is a bit more perplexing as that might have required foolamancy. Archon's could help there, though this could also mean that haffaton itself has a foolamancer.
It's possible. I for one have noticed that he often clarifies things for us as quickly as possible as long as it's just a small detail that doesn't affect the story. So this definitely points to proving that the Zamussles name was not just a lie she told to other sides, it was a name she held as her own. This could mean she popped with the surname Zamussles, or that as the Natural Signamancy of her defiance to Banhammer, her named changed to what she wanted it to be.Direcoyote wrote:I wonder if Rob put Jillian's full name in Jillian's post to answer the speculation from the last page. We know now that Jillian used her surname while she was a princess in Faq.
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.


cheeseaholic wrote:Considering they're fated to fall I'd call this a feature not a bug. Let someone take the deserted capital. Everyone max out your purse and turn all schmuckers into gems and hope it happens. Better than letting fate take its course and losing the capital some other time when it's full of people and you got nowhere to go. If you can't defeat fate, use it. Of course I doubt that Jillian thought that far ahead.
effataigus wrote:Recall that with a predictamancer and a lookamancer on staff, something will have gone seriously wrong if they ever fly over a single scout or warlord before the capital strike. Jack has been skilled enough to keep people who blundered into entire cities from noticing, but with a small mobile strike force like this one they don't have to leave that up to chance.
1. I agree that there is no solid evidence that this is Charlie... just that my mathamancy bracer gives him the plurality of the votes on this one.
2. Did you just imply that Faq was behind the fall of Goodminton?

Whispri wrote:[I think that FAQ is what killed the original Goodminton]
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.


Of course, it's also possible Delphie Predicted how Jillian would react and counted on it.ftl wrote:Man, predictamancers are arrogant.
Really, Delphie? Why would she think for even one second that whoever found the note would believe it and would follow the instructions?
I completely don't blame Jillian for ignoring it entirely. For all she knows it could be another Haffaton trap.
Aquillion wrote:Of course, it's also possible Delphie Predicted how Jillian would react and counted on it.
(But unlikely.)
GJC wrote:Two guys with basically the same name in a discussion about a character getting cloned.
There's gotta be a good joke in here somewhere.


Whispri wrote:Hundreds of guys in the open sky ain't small in terms of search profile. Even if the Megawhatevers only count as a single 'ping' regardless of the number of passengers, it's not like that Foolamancer was expected to hide Stanley and his Dwagons from the Translyvito ambush. It should be remembered that Scouts can hide themselves from sight and that patrols can sweeep a wide area. It's much more serious a problem than having to hide an isolated City from time to time.
Whispri wrote:1. Why? What would he gain from it? An empty treasury and a City he didn't manage to raze?
Whispri wrote:2. No, I stated it outright and not for the first time in this thread, let alone all the others. Here I'll do it again: Faq had means, motive and opportunity with regards to the murder of the Side of Goodminton.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests