by Infidel » Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:16 am
I find the duty information more intriguing than the predictamancy. Lets assume predictamancy is always true.
Olive is duty bound to protect her ruler.
Olive knows Jillian will kill Judy.
Should be a done deal--kill Jillian and remove the threat, but the kicker seems to be.
Olive insists on turning Jillian.
Turning Jillian would help the side and protect Judy.
So this is sort of like the laws of robotics in motion. When there is a conflict with two contradictory means to meet duty, someone can act according to their own will, but only so far as the conflict exists, even if the conflict is created for this specific purpose. Olive cant encourage Jillian to hurry up and kill Judy, and she also has Jillian under hard and soft controls. So her duty is still being performed to the best of her ability. She is not allowing for the opportunity for Jillian to do her fated action. So her duty is technically being done for everything under her control.
Her push to force Jillian to turn is ostensibly to get Jillian to turn before she has the opportunity to hurt the ruler. Again technically correct. But in Olive's mind she has the prediction that at some point Jillian will evade Olive's controls despite her efforts to the contrary. So the real goal is to motivate Jillian to act. And the reason Olive "likes" Jillian, because she has shown herself able to think creatively to evade constraints. Which is good because Olive can't deliberately provide openings due to duty, she has to rely on Jillian's resourcefulness. Wanda, Jillian's guard, is there both as hard control, in case Jillian stops being incapacitated, and because Jillian has already shown herself able to escape from Wanda. Wanda is also known to be disaffected and I'm sure this played into the decision to have her guard Jillian as well.
So the same grey area that frustrates people about predictamancy is also the means by which duty bound individuals can use it for their own ends. Since predicamancy is unclear, the world does not force duty bound warlords to react based on predictamancy. So a warlord doesn't need to treat a predicted threat any differently than an unpredicted one; duty applies to the threat presented.
Also, there doesn't seem to be a learning curve to duty. Someone who failed at a task before can be assigned the same task again, perhaps in the hope they will fail again. Maybe a warlord could recruit or promote bodyguards that failed to save their previous warlords, and assign them to guard the ruler.
It also makes the Heroine bud a bit more pointed a message. "Hurry up and kill the evil overlady already, Ms. Heroine"
It is not clear yet which is more a factor here for a warlord to exert free will to the extent of conspiring against a ruler: The ability to ignore predicted threats, or the need for conflicting duty.
Who is that beautiful red-headed devil,
Stabs you in the heart so that she can level?
It's Scarlet! - BC