Whispri wrote:I have nothing but contempt for the Side of Faq. I mean, how many Haffaton Cities did they plunder? And they DARE scream blue murder when Haffaton fight back? Hypocrites.
two cities, first the level 2 diecast and then then goodminton which no effort was put into restoring the city; very minor losses considering they were retaken next turn. Not only did haffaton take back these cities the next turn without resistance, but they also croaked Faq's best fighters and captured their heir; and considering how much it costs to have an heir, the heir would be much more valuable than a pair of cities that we recaptured. Haffaton already fought back and hurt FAq far more than it hurt them.
Furtharmore, We can tell from Banhammer's words that, since Jillian's recaptured, Banhammer made every effort to end this fighting peacefully, and haffaton rejected all offers choosing to side with conquest instead. Haffaton would not even agree to a simple parley to negotiate. Really how can you possibly defend Haffaton after you have seen how VILE olive branch is. Haffaton is a vile expansionists side that is attempting to eat up everyside around it; they were a threat to Faq even before they knew faq existed. With their complete rejection of offers of peace, Haffaton has proven that they have always been a threat to faq; they would have been crushed the moment they were discovered just like every other side that borders haffaton.
And let's not forget that the Chief Warlord of Faq had sworn they weren't a threat to Haffaton before attacking them anyway, so why bother with parley?
An assessment that was dead wrong considering Faq was the side that had all of its cities conquered
I mean, Jack and Gill are violating the spirit of that parely even now
Since when is two allied units talking to eachother a violation of parlay?