ftl wrote:Now THAT is a turn did not anticipate.
What's Olive's game here? What's Banhammer's?
It's obviously a trap, but with a lookamancer and predictamancer, perhaps they know that already and have a longer plan?
Aquillion wrote:Banhammer is right to stay, though, even without a clear plan.
MonteCristo wrote:not sure, but we do know that Olive just offered to show banhammer haffaton's hospitality, and we know that one of her favorite games is Poison
ftl wrote:What's Olive's game here? What's Banhammer's?
Personally, I don't think that Banhammer's actions are THAT far off, we've seen over and over that combat method's are ultimately ineffective against Haffaton.
mcw0933 wrote:Agreed - fully expected Olive to come back with the axe, but I kept expecting the FAQ casters and Banhammer to outmaneuver. I think Jack siding with Jill in the vote does not bode well for some sort of surprise overturn.
MonteCristo wrote:Seems banhammer did not catch the contradiction in Olive's words. Namely she claims that Haffaton seeks peace above all else, but just last page Banhammer noted how haffaton had ignored all of Banhammer's attempts to settle matters between them peaceful and jumped right into conquest.
No one in particular wrote:... Haffaton is going to CHOKE on Faq.
Users browsing this forum: Xarx and 6 guests