Talk:Golem - Revision history

Jszellmer: /* Cloth Golems and Battle Bears */

2012-10-21T00:57:50Z

Cloth Golems and Battle Bears

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:57, 21 October 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:
	The battle bears, giraffe, and elephant are all stuffed animals, stitched together - likely "cloth golems," especially given the choices on page 9. Note "Battle Bears" weren't mentioned as a choice. From this, I submit that Battle Bears are a sub-class of Cloth Golem. And I only give that much because they can throw rocks, which other cloth golems can't do. [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] July 2, 2009		The battle bears, giraffe, and elephant are all stuffed animals, stitched together - likely "cloth golems," especially given the choices on page 9. Note "Battle Bears" weren't mentioned as a choice. From this, I submit that Battle Bears are a sub-class of Cloth Golem. And I only give that much because they can throw rocks, which other cloth golems can't do. [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] July 2, 2009
	:That is really weak, Noah. It's okay for Spec, but not Prop C. With so many incidents, someone would have directly called them by both names if they were the same. Oh, and Rob would have put them on the "Golem" Klog, instead of the never before seen Acid Rock Golem. After all, Parson says he wants the, "Battle Bears first", not "Cloth Golems". --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 03:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)		:That is really weak, Noah. It's okay for Spec, but not Prop C. With so many incidents, someone would have directly called them by both names if they were the same. Oh, and Rob would have put them on the "Golem" Klog, instead of the never before seen Acid Rock Golem. After all, Parson says he wants the, "Battle Bears first", not "Cloth Golems". --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 03:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
		+	::Speculation on my part, but could it be that Battle Bears are a type of Cloth Golem and that there would be other factors that would cause individuals to keep them distinct from other types? Battle Bears do seem to be more common than G-RAFs or LFNs and may have different capabilities and battlefield applications. When Parson says he wants the "Battle Bears first," could it be that, instead of operating from the standpoint that Battle Bears are not Cloth Golems, but rather prioritizing them because of a specific threat that they pose that the LFNs and G-RAFs don't? [[User:Jszellmer\|Jszellmer]] 20:57, 20 October 2012 (EDT)

	The reference to cloth golems with battle bears as a subtype is the second entry under 'Unit Types', just below the big, random blank section ... it may not be official canon, but it would seem to have 'notability'.		The reference to cloth golems with battle bears as a subtype is the second entry under 'Unit Types', just below the big, random blank section ... it may not be official canon, but it would seem to have 'notability'.

Yehonatan: Added signature, didn't leave it last time.

2009-08-01T08:33:38Z

Added signature, didn't leave it last time.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:33, 1 August 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:
	As the page currently exists, the subsection on Metal Golems states that the four golems that attacked a small stack of marbits {{Erf\|1\|087}} were metal golems. But at the same time, there is a statement in Speculation that names them as hard rock golems. Only one statement is correct, obviously. Since the number of golems shown in that panel is the exact number that Parson's Stupid Meal claimed GK had... four {{Erf\|1\|126}} (and the SM also claims that GK had only one metal golem), then I have to say that the statement in Speculation makes a whole lot more sense. Even though the four golems are gray/silver in color rather than the brown shown in the canonized image of a hard rock golem, the numbers add up perfectly for those four to be hard rock and not metal.		As the page currently exists, the subsection on Metal Golems states that the four golems that attacked a small stack of marbits {{Erf\|1\|087}} were metal golems. But at the same time, there is a statement in Speculation that names them as hard rock golems. Only one statement is correct, obviously. Since the number of golems shown in that panel is the exact number that Parson's Stupid Meal claimed GK had... four {{Erf\|1\|126}} (and the SM also claims that GK had only one metal golem), then I have to say that the statement in Speculation makes a whole lot more sense. Even though the four golems are gray/silver in color rather than the brown shown in the canonized image of a hard rock golem, the numbers add up perfectly for those four to be hard rock and not metal.

-	I am going to make a change to the page to reflect this train of thought, and if my logic is refuted we can revert.	+	I am going to make a change to the page to reflect this train of thought, and if my logic is refuted we can revert. --[[User:Yehonatan\|Yehonatan]] 08:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Yehonatan: Added discussion on the conflicting information about specific golems.

2009-08-01T08:27:34Z

Added discussion on the conflicting information about specific golems.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 1 August 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:

	OK, so while [[Battle Bear]]s seems to be in dispute as to their Cloth Golem-ness, the giraffe and elephant do not seem to be nearly as controversial. Going to add a pic and reference to that effect. (personally, I'm still out on whether Battle Bears are really a sub-type of Cloth Golems, or something else entirely... we probably need to wait until some definitive proof comes along). --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 23:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		OK, so while [[Battle Bear]]s seems to be in dispute as to their Cloth Golem-ness, the giraffe and elephant do not seem to be nearly as controversial. Going to add a pic and reference to that effect. (personally, I'm still out on whether Battle Bears are really a sub-type of Cloth Golems, or something else entirely... we probably need to wait until some definitive proof comes along). --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 23:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	=Four Golems Attacking Marbits=
		+
		+	As the page currently exists, the subsection on Metal Golems states that the four golems that attacked a small stack of marbits {{Erf\|1\|087}} were metal golems. But at the same time, there is a statement in Speculation that names them as hard rock golems. Only one statement is correct, obviously. Since the number of golems shown in that panel is the exact number that Parson's Stupid Meal claimed GK had... four {{Erf\|1\|126}} (and the SM also claims that GK had only one metal golem), then I have to say that the statement in Speculation makes a whole lot more sense. Even though the four golems are gray/silver in color rather than the brown shown in the canonized image of a hard rock golem, the numbers add up perfectly for those four to be hard rock and not metal.
		+
		+	I am going to make a change to the page to reflect this train of thought, and if my logic is refuted we can revert.

MisterB777: sectioning off Battle Bear discussion

2009-07-30T23:41:47Z

sectioning off Battle Bear discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 30 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Just wondering if I am right...Is the second golem from the right in the crap golem's picture sergeant schlock from schlock mercenary? (btw i suck at wikis so no fancy user name)		Just wondering if I am right...Is the second golem from the right in the crap golem's picture sergeant schlock from schlock mercenary? (btw i suck at wikis so no fancy user name)
		+
		+	=Cloth Golems and Battle Bears=

	Battle bears ''are'' a type of cloth golem chaps - reference added.		Battle bears ''are'' a type of cloth golem chaps - reference added.
Line 15:		Line 17:

	The reference to cloth golems with battle bears as a subtype is the second entry under 'Unit Types', just below the big, random blank section ... it may not be official canon, but it would seem to have 'notability'.		The reference to cloth golems with battle bears as a subtype is the second entry under 'Unit Types', just below the big, random blank section ... it may not be official canon, but it would seem to have 'notability'.
		+
		+	OK, so while [[Battle Bear]]s seems to be in dispute as to their Cloth Golem-ness, the giraffe and elephant do not seem to be nearly as controversial. Going to add a pic and reference to that effect. (personally, I'm still out on whether Battle Bears are really a sub-type of Cloth Golems, or something else entirely... we probably need to wait until some definitive proof comes along). --[[User:MisterB777\|MisterB777]] 23:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Kreistor at 03:24, 5 July 2009

2009-07-05T03:24:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:24, 5 July 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Page 10, Webinar has a sourmander, 2 crystal animals (tchotchkes?), two "battle bears," and a stuffed giraffe and elephant.		Page 10, Webinar has a sourmander, 2 crystal animals (tchotchkes?), two "battle bears," and a stuffed giraffe and elephant.
	The battle bears, giraffe, and elephant are all stuffed animals, stitched together - likely "cloth golems," especially given the choices on page 9. Note "Battle Bears" weren't mentioned as a choice. From this, I submit that Battle Bears are a sub-class of Cloth Golem. And I only give that much because they can throw rocks, which other cloth golems can't do. [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] July 2, 2009		The battle bears, giraffe, and elephant are all stuffed animals, stitched together - likely "cloth golems," especially given the choices on page 9. Note "Battle Bears" weren't mentioned as a choice. From this, I submit that Battle Bears are a sub-class of Cloth Golem. And I only give that much because they can throw rocks, which other cloth golems can't do. [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] July 2, 2009
		+	:That is really weak, Noah. It's okay for Spec, but not Prop C. With so many incidents, someone would have directly called them by both names if they were the same. Oh, and Rob would have put them on the "Golem" Klog, instead of the never before seen Acid Rock Golem. After all, Parson says he wants the, "Battle Bears first", not "Cloth Golems". --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 03:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

	The reference to cloth golems with battle bears as a subtype is the second entry under 'Unit Types', just below the big, random blank section ... it may not be official canon, but it would seem to have 'notability'.		The reference to cloth golems with battle bears as a subtype is the second entry under 'Unit Types', just below the big, random blank section ... it may not be official canon, but it would seem to have 'notability'.

195.93.21.104 at 20:19, 4 July 2009

2009-07-04T20:19:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 4 July 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Page 10, Webinar has a sourmander, 2 crystal animals (tchotchkes?), two "battle bears," and a stuffed giraffe and elephant.		Page 10, Webinar has a sourmander, 2 crystal animals (tchotchkes?), two "battle bears," and a stuffed giraffe and elephant.
	The battle bears, giraffe, and elephant are all stuffed animals, stitched together - likely "cloth golems," especially given the choices on page 9. Note "Battle Bears" weren't mentioned as a choice. From this, I submit that Battle Bears are a sub-class of Cloth Golem. And I only give that much because they can throw rocks, which other cloth golems can't do. [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] July 2, 2009		The battle bears, giraffe, and elephant are all stuffed animals, stitched together - likely "cloth golems," especially given the choices on page 9. Note "Battle Bears" weren't mentioned as a choice. From this, I submit that Battle Bears are a sub-class of Cloth Golem. And I only give that much because they can throw rocks, which other cloth golems can't do. [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] July 2, 2009
		+
		+	The reference to cloth golems with battle bears as a subtype is the second entry under 'Unit Types', just below the big, random blank section ... it may not be official canon, but it would seem to have 'notability'.

Commander I. Heartly Noah at 05:41, 2 July 2009

2009-07-02T05:41:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:41, 2 July 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I see no reference there. Nothing about Battle Bears at all. And I note it's written by SteveMB, not Rob Balder. I'm going to strip that out, unless someone can provide a reliable source for Battle Bears = Cloth Golems. (Note: Gwiffons are Marshmallow Peeps in the Real World: that doesn't make them Candy Golems.) --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)		I see no reference there. Nothing about Battle Bears at all. And I note it's written by SteveMB, not Rob Balder. I'm going to strip that out, unless someone can provide a reliable source for Battle Bears = Cloth Golems. (Note: Gwiffons are Marshmallow Peeps in the Real World: that doesn't make them Candy Golems.) --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Page 9, Ansom gives orders for Webinar to get some heavies together. "Heavy cav, sourmanders, tchotchkes, cloth golems..."
		+	Page 10, Webinar has a sourmander, 2 crystal animals (tchotchkes?), two "battle bears," and a stuffed giraffe and elephant.
		+	The battle bears, giraffe, and elephant are all stuffed animals, stitched together - likely "cloth golems," especially given the choices on page 9. Note "Battle Bears" weren't mentioned as a choice. From this, I submit that Battle Bears are a sub-class of Cloth Golem. And I only give that much because they can throw rocks, which other cloth golems can't do. [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] July 2, 2009

Kreistor at 04:43, 2 July 2009

2009-07-02T04:43:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 2 July 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Battle bears ''are'' a type of cloth golem chaps - reference added.		Battle bears ''are'' a type of cloth golem chaps - reference added.
		+
		+	I see no reference there. Nothing about Battle Bears at all. And I note it's written by SteveMB, not Rob Balder. I'm going to strip that out, unless someone can provide a reliable source for Battle Bears = Cloth Golems. (Note: Gwiffons are Marshmallow Peeps in the Real World: that doesn't make them Candy Golems.) --[[User:Kreistor\|Kreistor]] 04:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

195.93.21.104 at 18:33, 28 June 2009

2009-06-28T18:33:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 28 June 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Just wondering if I am right...Is the second golem from the right in the crap golem's picture sergeant schlock from schlock mercenary? (btw i suck at wikis so no fancy user name)		Just wondering if I am right...Is the second golem from the right in the crap golem's picture sergeant schlock from schlock mercenary? (btw i suck at wikis so no fancy user name)
		+
		+	Battle bears ''are'' a type of cloth golem chaps - reference added.

98.207.237.205 at 05:08, 24 June 2009

2009-06-24T05:08:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:08, 24 June 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I rearranged and re-captioned the pictures into what I'm 99% sure is the correct names & locations. This leaves us short a picture for cloth golems. Also made some changes to some descriptions. - [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] May 22, 12:39		I rearranged and re-captioned the pictures into what I'm 99% sure is the correct names & locations. This leaves us short a picture for cloth golems. Also made some changes to some descriptions. - [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah\|Commander I. Heartly Noah]] May 22, 12:39
		+
		+	Just wondering if I am right...Is the second golem from the right in the crap golem's picture sergeant schlock from schlock mercenary? (btw i suck at wikis so no fancy user name)