Talk:Shmucker

From ErfWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Shmucker or Schmucker: new section)
(Razing of progrock: new section)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
I've noticed that in later uses, Rob has been putting an extra 'c' in Shmucker. Is that the proper spelling now? [[User:Miment|Miment]] 20:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I've noticed that in later uses, Rob has been putting an extra 'c' in Shmucker. Is that the proper spelling now? [[User:Miment|Miment]] 20:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Razing of progrock ==
 +
 +
"Jillian felt Faq's treasury increase by about 40,000 when she razed Progrock, noting at the same time that this sum would secure her side's upkeep for 8-10 turns, putting Faq's total upkeep between 4,000 and 5,000 per turn."
 +
I think the 4-5k number is not Faq's total upkeep but it's ''losses'' aka upkeep - income. Faq has farms and cities to generate some revenue but I assume it's not enough to cover it's current forces.

Latest revision as of 03:51, 23 April 2011

Other measures of value that I'm not sure how to include:

1) In Page 1 of Erfworld, a single Gem was apparently worth (at least as much as) 1 squad of marbit axemen. It is unknown if Gems come in multiple sizes/denominations, nor how many Shmuckers this would be equivalent to (assuming Gems and Shmuckers can be interchanged). [1]

[edit] Shmucker or Schmucker

I've noticed that in later uses, Rob has been putting an extra 'c' in Shmucker. Is that the proper spelling now? Miment 20:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Razing of progrock

"Jillian felt Faq's treasury increase by about 40,000 when she razed Progrock, noting at the same time that this sum would secure her side's upkeep for 8-10 turns, putting Faq's total upkeep between 4,000 and 5,000 per turn." I think the 4-5k number is not Faq's total upkeep but it's losses aka upkeep - income. Faq has farms and cities to generate some revenue but I assume it's not enough to cover it's current forces.

Go To:
Personal tools