Talk:Shmucker
From ErfWiki
m (→Shmucker or Schmucker: new section) |
(→Razing of progrock: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I've noticed that in later uses, Rob has been putting an extra 'c' in Shmucker. Is that the proper spelling now? [[User:Miment|Miment]] 20:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | I've noticed that in later uses, Rob has been putting an extra 'c' in Shmucker. Is that the proper spelling now? [[User:Miment|Miment]] 20:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Razing of progrock == | ||
| + | |||
| + | "Jillian felt Faq's treasury increase by about 40,000 when she razed Progrock, noting at the same time that this sum would secure her side's upkeep for 8-10 turns, putting Faq's total upkeep between 4,000 and 5,000 per turn." | ||
| + | I think the 4-5k number is not Faq's total upkeep but it's ''losses'' aka upkeep - income. Faq has farms and cities to generate some revenue but I assume it's not enough to cover it's current forces. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:51, 23 April 2011
Other measures of value that I'm not sure how to include:
1) In Page 1 of Erfworld, a single Gem was apparently worth (at least as much as) 1 squad of marbit axemen. It is unknown if Gems come in multiple sizes/denominations, nor how many Shmuckers this would be equivalent to (assuming Gems and Shmuckers can be interchanged). [1]
[edit] Shmucker or Schmucker
I've noticed that in later uses, Rob has been putting an extra 'c' in Shmucker. Is that the proper spelling now? Miment 20:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Razing of progrock
"Jillian felt Faq's treasury increase by about 40,000 when she razed Progrock, noting at the same time that this sum would secure her side's upkeep for 8-10 turns, putting Faq's total upkeep between 4,000 and 5,000 per turn." I think the 4-5k number is not Faq's total upkeep but it's losses aka upkeep - income. Faq has farms and cities to generate some revenue but I assume it's not enough to cover it's current forces.
![[1]](http://www.erfworld.com/book-1-archive/?px=%2F001.jpg){kind=link}