User:Raphfrk

From ErfWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
PLease review [[Turn-Based Movement]] wrt [[Turn]]. It's very much redundant. Turn is already cross referenced everywhere. Just shorten it up to be a description of Turn-based Movement, ie. that it's a cyclic system, compared with a real time system. --[[User:Kreistor|Kreistor]] 05:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
PLease review [[Turn-Based Movement]] wrt [[Turn]]. It's very much redundant. Turn is already cross referenced everywhere. Just shorten it up to be a description of Turn-based Movement, ie. that it's a cyclic system, compared with a real time system. --[[User:Kreistor|Kreistor]] 05:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Responses==
 +
Regarding Regents, all we know (as far as I know) is that Big Al was a "Regent Warlord" and that putting a warlord in a city to do rounds increases its efficiency.  Whether these two are exactly the same thing, or that a Regent Warlord is something specific is speculation. [[User:Commander I. Heartly Noah]]

Latest revision as of 19:12, 4 November 2009

Erk has given you a fortune cookie. Inside it reads: "Your hard work on panel-by-panel project will bring for pleasure the workplace. 16-18-42-53-89-97"

PLease review Turn-Based Movement wrt Turn. It's very much redundant. Turn is already cross referenced everywhere. Just shorten it up to be a description of Turn-based Movement, ie. that it's a cyclic system, compared with a real time system. --Kreistor 05:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Responses

Regarding Regents, all we know (as far as I know) is that Big Al was a "Regent Warlord" and that putting a warlord in a city to do rounds increases its efficiency. Whether these two are exactly the same thing, or that a Regent Warlord is something specific is speculation. User:Commander I. Heartly Noah

Go To:
Personal tools